Carbon monoxide pressure

The composition of the products of reactions involving intermediates formed by metaHation depends on whether the measured composition results from kinetic control or from thermodynamic control. Thus the addition of diborane to 2-butene initially yields tri-j iAbutylboraneTri-j -butylborane. If heated and allowed to react further, this product isomerizes about 93% to the tributylborane, the product initially obtained from 1-butene (15). Similar effects are observed during hydroformylation reactions however, interpretation is more compHcated because the relative rates of isomerization and of carbonylation of the reaction intermediate depend on temperature and on hydrogen and carbon monoxide pressures (16). 

The reaction is carried out in the Hquid phase at 373—463 K and 3 MPa (30 atm) of carbon monoxide pressure using nickel salt catalyst, or at 313 K and 0.1 MPa (1 atm) using nickel carbonyl as both the catalyst and the source of carbon monoxide. Either acryHc acid or methyl acrylate may be produced directly, depending on whether water or methanol is used as solvent (41). New technology for acryHc acid production uses direct propjdene oxidation rather than acetylene carbonylation because of the high cost of acetjdene. This new process has completely replaced the old in the United States (see... 

Commercial production of these acids essentially follows the mechanistic steps given. This is most clearly seen in the Exxon process of Figure 1 (32). In the reactor, catalyst, olefin, and CO react to give the complex. After degassing, hydrolysis of this complex takes place. The acid and catalyst are then separated, and the trialkylacetic acid is purified in the distillation section. The process postulated to be used by Shell (Fig. 2) is similar, with additional steps prior to distillation being used. In 1980, the conditions used were described as ca 40—70°C and 7—10 MPa (70—100 bar) carbon monoxide pressure with H PO —BF —H2O in the ratio 1 1 1 (Shell) or with BF (Enjay) as catalyst (33). 

A Belgian patent (178) claims improved ethanol selectivity of over 62%, starting with methanol and synthesis gas and using a cobalt catalyst with a hahde promoter and a tertiary phosphine. At 195°C, and initial carbon monoxide pressure of 7.1 MPa (70 atm) and hydrogen pressure of 7.1 MPa, methanol conversions of 30% were indicated, but the selectivity for acetic acid and methyl acetate, usehil by-products from this reaction, was only 7%. Ruthenium and osmium catalysts (179,180) have also been employed for this reaction. The addition of a bicycHc trialkyl phosphine is claimed to increase methanol conversion from 24% to 89% (181). 

FIG. 2-8 Temperatnre-entropy diagram for carbon monoxide. Pressure P, in atmospheres density p, in grams per cubic enthalpy H, in joules per gram. (From Must and Stewart, NBS Tech. Note 202, 1963.)... 

If the reaction temperature is raised to 430 K and the carbon monoxide pressure to 3 atm, coordination of the metal atom in the rearranged product occurs via the phosphorus site, as in 159 (M = Cr, Mo, W) [84JOM(263)55]. Along with this product (M = W) at 420 K, formation of the dimer of 5-phenyl-3,4-dimethyl-2//-phosphole, 160 (the a complex), is possible as a consequence of [4 - - 2] cycloaddition reactions. Chromium hexacarbonyl in turn forms phospholido-bridged TiyP)-coordinatedcomplex 161. At 420 K in excess 2,3-dimethylbutadiene, a transformation 162 163 takes place (82JA4484). 

The medil carbonyls FefCOij, RiufC0 i2, andRhjfCo, j arecadilysts for the deoxygenadon of o-nitrostyrenes tinder carbon monoxide pressure to give indole derivadves fEq. 10.59. ... 

Hydro carbonylation of olefins, hydroformylation, hydroesterification and hy-droxycarbonylation are reactions which appear to be of particular interest. Indeed, they allow the simultaneous creation of a new C - C bond as well as the introduction of a functional group (aldehyde, ester and acids). One or two new stereogenic centres can thus be formed at the same time (Scheme 26). Despite the difficulty of using high carbon monoxide pressure, the aheady existing industrial processes prove that such reactions can be performed on a very large scale [107]. 

The last-mentioned line intersects the metal oxide line at a lower temperature than the line corresponding to the formation of carbon monoxide at 1 atm. It is, therefore, clear that the minimum temperature required for the carbothermic reduction of the metal oxide under vacuum is less than the minimum temperature for the same reaction at atmospheric pressure. Thus, by increasing the temperature and decreasing the pressure of carbon monoxide, it may be possible to reduce carbothermically virtually all the oxides. This possibility has been summarized by Kruger in the statement that at about 1750 °C and at a carbon monoxide pressure below 1CT3 atm, carbon is the most efficient reducing agent for oxides. 

The minimum temperature necessary for the formation of the metal under a particular reduction pressure is that temperature at which the corresponding carbon monoxide pressure line intersects the Nb2C-NbO-Nb equilibrium line in the Pourbaix-Ellingham diagram. 

For a reduction pressure of 10 4 atm, NbO and Nb2C react to form niobium and carbon monoxide at 1687 °C. When the carbon monoxide pressure is kept at 10-6 atm, the reaction resulting in the formation of the metal would occur, according to the diagram, at 1382 °C. 

The temperature required for reduction depends on the carbon monoxide pressure maintained in the system. It is 2130 °C when the pressure is 1 torr, and 1705 °C when the pressure is 10 torr. Because of the high melting point of tantalum (3020 °C), it may be possible to obtain the metal in the solid state even at 1 atm carbon monoxide pressure since the temperature required in this case is 2860 °C. 

At the present, it is difficult to predict a distinct rhodium catalyst showing the appropriate properties. Furthermore, the reaction conditions applied will influence the outcome of the reaction also. Low carbon monoxide pressure favours p-hydride elimination by enhanced CO dissociation which allows for the formation of vacant sites at the metal... 

The metal carbonyls Fe(CO)5, Ru3(CO)i2, and Rh6(Co) 16 are catalysts for the deoxygenation of o-nitrostyrenes under carbon monoxide pressure to give indole derivatives (Eq. 10.59).82... 

As a result of the kinetics and the equilibria mentioned above, all iodide in the system occurs as methyl iodide. The reaction in Equation (2) makes the rate of the catalytic process independent of the methanol concentration. Within the operation window of the process, the reaction rate is independent of the carbon monoxide pressure. The selectivity in methanol is in the high 90s but the selectivity in carbon monoxide may be as low as 90%. This is due to the water-gas shift reaction ... 

The essential factor which differentiates the monomeric and dimeric carbonylations seems to be the presence or absence of halide ion coordinated to the palladium. The dimerization-carbonylation proceeds satisfactorily with halide-free palladium phosphine complexes. Most conveniently, Pd(OAc)2 is used with PPh3. PdCl2(PPh3)2 can be used as a catalyst with addition of an excess of bases. The reaction is carried out at 1I0°C under 50 atm of carbon monoxide pressure in alcohol. Higher... 

Rate dependence on carbon monoxide pressure. zero order inverse first order inverse first order inverse first order... 

Allyl methylcarbonate reacts with norbornene following a ruthenium-catalyzed carbonylative cyclization under carbon monoxide pressure to give cyclopentenone derivatives 12 (Scheme 4).32 Catalyst loading, amine and CO pressure have been optimized to give the cyclopentenone compound in 80% yield and a total control of the stereoselectivity (exo 100%). Aromatic or bidentate amines inhibit the reaction certainly by a too strong interaction with ruthenium. A plausible mechanism is proposed. Stereoselective CM-carboruthenation of norbornene with allyl-ruthenium complex 13 followed by carbon monoxide insertion generates an acylruthenium intermediate 15. Intramolecular carboruthenation and /3-hydride elimination of 16 afford the -olefin 17. Isomerization of the double bond under experimental conditions allows formation of the cyclopentenone derivative 12. 

F. Oldani, G. Bor. Fundamental Metal Carbonyl Equilibria. II. A Quantitative Study of the Equilibrium between Dirhodium Octacarbonyl and Tetrarhodium Dodecacar-bonyl under Carbon Monoxide Pressure. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983,246, 309-324 ibid. 1985,279, 459-460. 

Lowering the carbon monoxide pressure should result in higher concentrations of the active species A1 and hence higher reaction rate according to Eq. 5. But by destabilization of the intermediate species A2, the equilibria are also shifted to the carbon monoxide-deficient clusters. Higher clusters like A4 and M6(CO)i6 cannot be neglected in Eq. 1, and even become the predominant species. This lowers the concentration of A2/A1 and hence the reaction... 

Exposure of the reaction mixture to reduced carbon monoxide pressure in the flash-tank has implications for catalyst stability. Since the metal catalyst exists principally as iodocarbonyl complexes (e.g. [Rh(CO)2l2] and [Rh(CO)2l4]" for the Rh system), loss of CO ligands and precipitation of insoluble metal species (e.g. Rhl3) can be problematic. It is found that catalyst solubility is enhanced at high water concentrations but this results in a more costly separation process to dry the product. The presence of water also results in occurrence of the water gas shift (WGS) reaction (Eq. 6), which can be catalysed by Rh and Ir iodocarbonyls, in competition with the desired carbonylation process, resulting in a lower utilisation of CO ... 

A high carbon monoxide pressure ( 5 atmos.) favours the formation of the butane. Possible mechanisms for its formation include homolytic cleavage of the benzyl-cobalt tetracarbonyl complex and recombination of the radicals to generate 2,3-diphenylbutane and dicobalt octacarbonyl, or a base-catalysed decomposition of the benzylcobalt tetracarbonyl complex (Scheme 8.4). The ethylbenzene and styrene could arise from the phenylethyl radical, or from the n-styrene hydridocobalt tricarbonyl complex. 

The rate-determining step in this process is the oxidative addition of methyl iodide to 1. Within the operating window of the process the reaction rate is independent of the carbon monoxide pressure and independent of the concentration of methanol. The methyl species 2 formed in reaction (2) cannot be observed under the reaction conditions. The methyl iodide intermediate enables the formation of a methyl rhodium complex methanol is not sufficiently electrophilic to carry out this reaction. As for other nucleophiles, the reaction is much slower with methyl bromide or methyl chloride as the catalyst component. 

Figure 6.1S Difference IR spectrum obtained after addition of H2 to a solution of DRh(38)(CO)2 and DRh(38)2(CO) (indicated by ) under carbon monoxide pressure at 80°C. Reproduced from Ref [55] with permission.

Chromium hexacarbonyl is prepared by the reaction of anhydrous chromi-um(lll) chloride with carbon monoxide in the presence of a Grignard reagent. A 60% product yield may be obtained at the carbon monoxide pressures of 35 to 70 atm. Other chromium salts may be used with carbon monoxide and Grignard reagent in the preparation. The compound may also be obtained by the reaction of a chromium salt with carbon monoxide in the presence of magnesium in ether or sodium in diglyme. 

Manganese decacarbonyl is prepared by the reduction of methylcyclopen-tadienyhnanganese tricarbonyl (MMT) with sodium in diglyme under carbon monoxide pressure. 

Tungsten hexacarbonyl is produced by heating tungsten metal with carbon monoxide at high pressure. Also, carbonyl can be prepared by reducing the tungsten hexachloride by heating with iron powder under carbon monoxide pressure. 

The concept that acetic acid can be prepared by carbonylation originated in use of routine acids. Carbonylation of methanol was first practiced in a high temperature and pressure process using boron trifluoride or phosphoric acid. A carbon monoxide pressure of 10,000 psi at 300 C was needed for the reaction (10). Metal salts came to replace acids as carbonylation catalysts. Carbonylation of methanol using a metal carbonyl catalyst was first discovered by Reppe and practised later by BASF. However, the process again required high pressure, 7500-10,000 psi, and the selectivity was low (11-14). 

To understand how to control process conditions to give methyl, 4-pentadienoate, the reaction mechanism must be examined. (See Equation 2.). -palladium hydride elimination from 4 gives rise to trans and cis-methyl penta-, 4-dienoate which is the desired monocarbonylation intermediate for sebacic acid. The desired mono-carbonylation reaction is promoted by low carbon monoxide pressure ( 1000 psig) while high pressure (1800 psig) gives excellent 1,4-dicarbonylation product yield. The mono-carbonylation reaction is also facilitated by using a Lewis Acid as a co-catalyst and iodide as the preferred palladium counter-ion (Table III.). Chloride is the preferred palladium counter-ion for 1,4-dicarbonylation. 

The picture is different for the bimetallic ruthenium-rhodium systems both metals in the presence of iodide promoters and CO give anionic iodocarbonyl species, namely [Ru(C0) I ] and [Rh(CO)2l2] j but the range of I, CO concentration and temperature in which the anions exist and are catalytically active in carbonylation reactions is different. [Ru(CO)3l2] species in fact are extensively transformed at high temperature and low carbon monoxide pressure by an excess of I (i.e. I/Ru 50) into catalytically inactive [Ru(CO)2l4] (v q 2047, 1990 cm"l in THF (JJ.)) (eq. 1), whereas [Rh(CO)2l2] can work in the carbonylation process only in the presence of a large excess of I"" (I/Rh 100-1000) which prevents reduction to metal (12) (for instance at 150 C rhodium(I) carbonyl halides, [Rh(CO) X2]"", without CH3I under a CO/H2 pressure of 10 MPa are completely reduced to metal). 

The analogous reaction of the 2-chloropyrimidine derivative in 7.62. was also run at elevated temperature under 15 bar CO pressure. Depending on the alcohol, which was either added in excess or used as solvent, the desired esters were isolated in good to excellent yield. If the reaction was run at decreased carbon monoxide pressure, then the dehalogenation of the pyrimidine also became significant.81 The effect of the used ligand was also tested and l,l -bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) gave the best results. 

The carbonylative cross-coupling reactions of haloazines are usually run under an ambient to moderate carbon monoxide pressure. Arylboronic acids or tetraarylborates are usually the reagent of choice due to their robustness and availability. The coupling of 2-iodopyridine and phenylboronic acid under ambient CO pressure, for example, led to the formation of 2-benzoylpyridine in good yield (7.66.),87... 

---