Cantilever system

A MEMS based thermal collection/separator system (in conjunction with the ORNL micro cantilever systems). 

FIGURE 10.15 Schematic of the tip/sample interaction in AFM using a cantilever system. 

In principle, the piezo/cantilever system can reach a force sensitivity of about 10 N. In practice, thermal dilations induce drift of surfaces with respect to each other, reducing the accuracy of the piezo displacement and the sensitivity. For this reason, the micas and the cantilever are closed in a sealed clean chamber, that is temperature-controlled in the range 15- 45°C with an accuracy of 0.05°C. In this way, thermal drifts are reduced to a few tenths of nm per minute and the contamination of mica and the sample is avoided. The resulting experimental force sensitivity is about 10 N. The force measurement is performed by progressively approaching or retracting the surfaces. When the equilibrium separation is reached, the piezo displacement and the transmitted wavelengths are recorded. A complete approach/retraction cycle takes typically 30 minutes. A review on the SFA technique can be found in [41]. 

A tie back system can be combined with any of the above cantilever systems to create a more efficient retraining wall. Soil nails and rock anchors are the most commonly used tie back elements. Any other... 

A novel hybrid molecular simulation technique was developed to simulate AFM over experimental timescales. This method combines a dynamic element model for the tip-cantilever system in AFM and an MD relaxation approach for the sample. The hybrid simulation technique was applied to investigate the atomic scale friction and adhesion properties of SAMs as a function of chain length [81], The Ryckaert-Bellmans potential, harmonic potential, and Lennard-Jones potential were used. The Ryckaert-Bellmans potential, which is for torsion, has the form... 

Gorelkin PV, Kiselev GA, Mukhin DS, KimTS, Kim SK, Lee SM, Yaminskii IV. Use of biospecific reactions for the design of high-sensitivity biosensors based on nanomechani-cal cantilever systems. Polym Sci SerA 2010 52 1023-1033. 

Figure 2b Idealized approach-retract curve plot of the oscillation amplitude variation with the tip-sample distance during the approach and retraction of a sample toward an oscillating tip-cantilever system. First, when the tip is far from the sample, it oscillates with its free amplitude Af as depicted in part a. In part b, the tip-CL system interacts with the surface through an attractive field. If the drive frequency is slightly below the resonance one, the oscillation amplitude increases. Part c corresponds to the so-called AFM tapping mode where the tip comes in intermittent contact with the sample. In this part, the oscillatory amplitude A decreases linearly with the CL-surface distance d with a slope equal to 1 if the sample is hard, that is if dcAf, A(d) = d. In part d, the tip is stuck on the sample with an oscillation amplitude down to zero. The tip might be damaged this part is usually avoided.

All those experimental results can be satisfactorily described by the study (with analytical expressions or simulations) of the oscillating behavior of the tip-cantilever system in interaction with the sample through an attractive force field (20, 28). When the tip is close to the sample, the non linear dynamical behaviour of the oscillator gives a bifurcation from a monostable to a bistable state. Theoretical work shows that it is very informative to follow not only the variations of the amplitude during the approach and retraction but also the phase variations (20,29,63). 

The sample-tip-cantilever system can be modeled as a mechanical system with springs and dash-pots 11,12). Solving the motion equations of this model at low frequency (i.e. below the cantilever resonance frequency) and neglecting the damping constants (i.e. neglecting viscoelastic effects in polymers) leads to the following relation for the ratio between the sample modulation amplitude, z, and the tip response amplitude, also called the dynamic elastic response ... 

To properly investigate this phenomenon, different materials with various configurations have been developed. The first configuration presented here is the bimorph cantilever system shown in Rgure 16.1, and the second configuration is a piezoelectric plate mounted on the surface of a large structure to provide strain fluctuations, as... 

Yoo Y, Chae M, Kang J, Kim T, Hwang K, Lee J (2012) Multifunctionalized cantilever systems for electronic nose applications. Anal Chem 84 8240-8245... 

A major advance in force measurement was the development by Tabor, Win-terton and Israelachvili of a surface force apparatus (SFA) involving crossed cylinders coated with molecularly smooth cleaved mica sheets [11, 28]. A current version of an apparatus is shown in Fig. VI-4 from Ref. 29. The separation between surfaces is measured interferometrically to a precision of 0.1 nm the surfaces are driven together with piezoelectric transducers. The combination of a stiff double-cantilever spring with one of a number of measuring leaf springs provides force resolution down to 10 dyn (10 N). Since its development, several groups have used the SFA to measure the retarded and unretarded dispersion forces, electrostatic repulsions in a variety of electrolytes, structural and solvation forces (see below), and numerous studies of polymeric and biological systems. 

To enable an atomic interpretation of the AFM experiments, we have developed a molecular dynamics technique to simulate these experiments [49], Prom such force simulations rupture models at atomic resolution were derived and checked by comparisons of the computed rupture forces with the experimental ones. In order to facilitate such checks, the simulations have been set up to resemble the AFM experiment in as many details as possible (Fig. 4, bottom) the protein-ligand complex was simulated in atomic detail starting from the crystal structure, water solvent was included within the simulation system to account for solvation effects, the protein was held in place by keeping its center of mass fixed (so that internal motions were not hindered), the cantilever was simulated by use of a harmonic spring potential and, finally, the simulated cantilever was connected to the particular atom of the ligand, to which in the AFM experiment the linker molecule was connected. 

Fig. 5. Block diagram of contact atomic force microscope system in which cantilever deflection monitored optically with position-sensitive photodiode...

The force and moment ia a constrained system can be estimated by the cantilever formula. Leg MB is a cantilever subject to a displacement of and leg CB subject to a displacement Av. Taking leg CB, for example, the task has become the problem of a cantilever beam with length E and displacement of Av. This problem caimot be readily solved, because the end condition at is an unknown quantity. However, it can be conservatively solved by assuming there is no rotation at poiat B. This is equivalent to putting a guide at poiat B, and results ia higher estimate ia force, moment, and stress. The approach is called guided-cantilever method. 

For SFM, maintaining a constant separation between the tip and the sample means that the deflection of the cantilever must be measured accurately. The first SFM used an STM tip to tunnel to the back of the cantilever to measure its vertical deflection. However, this technique was sensitive to contaminants on the cantilever." Optical methods proved more reliable. The most common method for monitoring the defection is with an optical-lever or beam-bounce detection system. In this scheme, light from a laser diode is reflected from the back of the cantilever into a position-sensitive photodiode. A given cantilever deflection will then correspond to a specific position of the laser beam on the position-sensitive photodiode. Because the position-sensitive photodiode is very sensitive (about 0.1 A), the vertical resolution of SFM is sub-A. 

Fig. 5.5. Schematic view of the deflection sensing system as used in the NanoScope III AFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The deflection ofthe cantilever is amplified by a laser beam focused on the rear ofthe cantilever and reflected towards a split photodiode detector.

Optical or laser alignment systems are based on the same principles as the reverse-dial method, but replace the mechanical components such as runout gages and cantilevered mounting arms with an optical device such as a laser. As with the reverse-dial method, offset is measured and angularity is calculated. 

The equipment required for slow strain-rate testing is simply a device that permits a selection of deflection rates whilst being powerful enough to cope with the loads generated. Plain or precracked specimens in tension may be used but if the cross-section of these needs to be large or the loads high for any reason, cantilever bend specimens with the beam deflected at appropriate rates may be used. It is important to appreciate that the same deflection rate does not produce the same response in all systems and that the rate has to be chosen in relation to the particular system studied (see Section 8.1). 

Attention must be paid to field end effects, particularly on cantilever anodes, e.g. on long anodes that extend away from the cathode surface. Under these circumstances the anode surface close to the cathode may be operating at a considerably higher current density than the mean value, with the exact values dependent upon the system geometry. The life of the platinising in this region would then be reduced in inverse proportion to the current density. 

Platinised-titanium installations have now been in use for 30 years for jetties, ships and submarines and for internal protection, particularly of cooling-water systems . For the protection of heat exchangers an extruded anode of approximately 6 mm in diameter (copper-cored titanium-platinum) has shown a reduction in current requirement (together with improved longitudinal current spread) over cantilever anodes of some 30% . This continuous or coaxial anode is usually fitted around the water box periphery a few centimetres away from the tubeplate. 

Thus, if 5 = 1mm, / = 15.8 Hz. This very simple result is quite useful for approximately evaluating the gravity driven deflections of a stmeture given its natural frequency, or visa versa. Of course this was derived for a specific and very simple system, so it does not perfectly apply to more complex systems. Still it is a very useful rule of thumb. For a mass on the end of a cantilever beam, the above formula is correct. The lowest natural frequency of a massive cantilever beam is about 1.2 x the prediction of the above formula. 

Binnig et al. [48] invented the atomic force microscope in 1985. Their original model of the AFM consisted of a diamond shard attached to a strip of gold foil. The diamond tip contacted the surface directly, with the inter-atomic van der Waals forces providing the interaction mechanism. Detection of the cantilever s vertical movement was done with a second tip—an STM placed above the cantilever. Today, most AFMs use a laser beam deflection system, introduced by Meyer and Amer [49], where a laser is reflected from the back of the reflective AFM lever and onto a position-sensitive detector. 

---