Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Deflection, beam

The deflection should be expected to vary with the strain at all points which in turn will be a function of llie bending moment (Wt), the distribution of area about the neutral axis measured by/, and the elastic stifi iess of llie material (Z). Since this is a statics problem only two fundamental dimen- [Pg.76]

Variables W and I are dimensionally independent and may be combined with each of the remaining three variables to form nondimensional groups. To satisfy dimensional homogeneity, Eq. (4.36) then becomes  [Pg.77]

For a linearly elastic beam, 5will vary inversely with the stiffness of the material and the moment of inertia of the section about the neutral axis. Hence, Eq. (4.37) may be written  [Pg.77]

It is important to note that E and appear only as the product EIj. This will be the case for all elastic deflection beam problems, and represents an important observation for dimensional analysis. Equation (4.36) could have been written [Pg.77]

The proportionality constant in Eq. (4.39) cannot be obtained by dimensional analysis, but must be obtained by performing a few simple experiments or a complete analysis involving caleulus. Either approach would reveal that the constant is one-third. In this case, the experiments could consist of a wooden yard stick and/or a circular dowel being clamped in a vice with different unsupported lengths as 5 is measured for a range of values of W. For each measurement, the constant in Eq. (4.39) would be calculated and the average for all measurements taken as the assumed value. [Pg.78]


Figure Bl.7.4. Schematic diagram of a reverse geometry (BE) magnetic sector mass spectrometer ion source (1) focusing lens (2) magnetic sector (3) field-free region (4) beam resolving slits (5) electrostatic sector (6) electron multiplier detector (7). Second field-free region components collision cells (8) and beam deflection electrodes (9). Figure Bl.7.4. Schematic diagram of a reverse geometry (BE) magnetic sector mass spectrometer ion source (1) focusing lens (2) magnetic sector (3) field-free region (4) beam resolving slits (5) electrostatic sector (6) electron multiplier detector (7). Second field-free region components collision cells (8) and beam deflection electrodes (9).
Meyer G and Amer N M 1990 Simultaneous measurement of lateral and normal forces with an optical-beam-deflection atomic force microscope Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 2089... [Pg.1725]

In the previous question the use of the 2% limiting strain will produce a conservative estimate for the beam length because the actual strain in the beam will be less than 2%. If the T-section is 25 mm wide and 25 mm deep with a general wall thickness of S mm, what is the % error incurred by using the 2% modulus . Calculate the likely beam deflection after 1 week. The central bending moment on the beam is given by WL/24. [Pg.158]

Fig. 8.11 Effect of beam deflection rate of cantilever beam specimens upon stress-corrosion crack velocity of carbon steel in carbonate-bicarbonate solution... Fig. 8.11 Effect of beam deflection rate of cantilever beam specimens upon stress-corrosion crack velocity of carbon steel in carbonate-bicarbonate solution...
The equipment required for slow strain-rate testing is simply a device that permits a selection of deflection rates whilst being powerful enough to cope with the loads generated. Plain or precracked specimens in tension may be used but if the cross-section of these needs to be large or the loads high for any reason, cantilever bend specimens with the beam deflected at appropriate rates may be used. It is important to appreciate that the same deflection rate does not produce the same response in all systems and that the rate has to be chosen in relation to the particular system studied (see Section 8.1). [Pg.1366]

A variety of other techniques have been used to investigate ion transport in conducting polymers. The concentrations of ions in the polymer or the solution phase have been monitored by a variety of in situ and ex situ techniques,8 such as radiotracer studies,188 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS),189 potentiometry,154 and Rutherford backscatter-ing.190 The probe-beam deflection method, in which changes in the density of the solution close to the polymer surface are monitored, provides valuable data on transient ion transport.191 Rotating-disk voltammetry, using an electroactive probe ion, provides very direct and reliable data, but its utility is very limited.156,19 193 Scanning electrochemical microscopy has also been used.194... [Pg.580]

Binnig et al. [48] invented the atomic force microscope in 1985. Their original model of the AFM consisted of a diamond shard attached to a strip of gold foil. The diamond tip contacted the surface directly, with the inter-atomic van der Waals forces providing the interaction mechanism. Detection of the cantilever s vertical movement was done with a second tip—an STM placed above the cantilever. Today, most AFMs use a laser beam deflection system, introduced by Meyer and Amer [49], where a laser is reflected from the back of the reflective AFM lever and onto a position-sensitive detector. [Pg.19]

Figure 2 shows the brief principle of a laser-detected FFM. A sample is put on a piezoelectrical tube (PZT), which scans X, Y plane and controls the feedback of Z axis. The laser beam from a diode is focused on the mirror of the free end of a cantilever with lens, and the reflected beam falls on the center of a position-sensitive detector (PSD), a four-quadrant photodiode. When the sample contacts with the tip and relatively moves under the control of a computer, the reflected beam deflects and changes the position on the PSD due to the twist and deflection of the cantilever caused by the changes of surface roughness, friction force, and adhesive force between the sample and the tip. The extension and re-... [Pg.188]

Mayer, G. and Amer, N. M., Simultaneous Measurement of Lateral and Normal Forces with an Optical-Beam-Deflection Atomic Force Microscope, AppZ. Phys. Lett., Vol. 57, 1990, pp. 2089-2091. [Pg.208]

FIG. 8 Schematic of an atomic force microscope with optical beam deflection detection showing a typical angle of 10° between lever and sample. [Pg.29]

An important consideration for the direct physical measurement of adhesion via pull-off measurements is the influence of the precise direction of the applied force. In AFM the cantilever does not usually lie parallel to the surface, due to the risk that another part of the cantilever chip or chip holder will make contact with the surface before the tip. Another problem relates to the fact that the spot size in the optical beam deflection method is usually larger than the width of the lever. This can result in an interference effect between the reflection from the sample and the reflection from the cantilever. This is reduced if the cantilever and sample are not parallel. Most commercial AFM systems use an angle in the range of 10°-15° between the sample and the cantilever. Depending on this angle and the extent to which the cantilever is bent away from its equilibrium position, there can be a significant fraction of unintentional lateral forces applied to the contact. [Pg.30]

Other, similar methods for measuring surface-surface interactions, which come under the generic heading of surface force apparatus, include the crossed-filament method. This utilizes a beam deflection technique similar to that now being used in some AFMs for the measurement of surface displacement [94]. Another technique for displacement measurement used in a similar SFA is that of a capacitance transducer. Both techniques suffer the criticism that separation is not measured at the point of interest, i.e., the gap between the two surfaces as measured in the FECO technique. [Pg.53]

The development of hydrodynamic techniques which allow the direct measurement of interfacial fluxes and interfacial concentrations is likely to be a key trend of future work in this area. Suitable detectors for local interfacial or near-interfacial measurements include spectroscopic probes, such as total internal reflection fluorometry [88-90], surface second-harmonic generation [91], probe beam deflection [92], and spatially resolved UV-visible absorption spectroscopy [93]. Additionally, building on the ideas in MEMED, submicrometer or nanometer scale electrodes may prove to be relatively noninvasive probes of interfacial concentrations in other hydrodynamic systems. The construction and application of electrodes of this size is now becoming more widespread and general [94-96]. [Pg.358]

We use a variant of flexural testing to measure a sample s heat distortion temperature. In this test, we place the sample in a three point bending fixture, as shown in Fig. 8.6 b), and apply a load sufficient to generate a standard stress within it. We then ramp the temperature of the sample at a fixed rate and note the temperature at which the beam deflects by a specified amount. This test is very useful when selecting polymers for engineering applications that are used under severe conditions, such as under the hoods of automobiles or as gears in many small appliances or inside power tools where heat tends to accumulate. [Pg.164]

This temperature rise can be detected directly (laser calorimetry and optical calorimetry), or indirectly by measuring the change in either the refractive index (thermal lensing, beam deflection or refraction and thermal grating) or the volume (photo- or optoacoustic methods). This review will focus primarily on photoacoustic methods because they have been the most widely used to obtain thermodynamic and kinetic information about reactive intermediates. Other calorimetric methods are discussed in more detail in a recent review.7... [Pg.254]

IR photothermal beam deflection spectroscopy (PBDS) and measurements of IR spectra of solids over the range 3950-450 cm l made with an interferometer coupled with a detector which senses the photothermal effect by the deflection of a laser beam are described. PBDS is a general technique and requires no sample preparation all that is needed is to hold the sample at the IR focus. The sample must have a flat spot about 2 mm in diameter accessible to the IR and laser beams. As no sample cells per se are... [Pg.403]

The technique employed is IR-FT photothermal beam deflection spectroscopy (PBDS). It is an off-shoot of photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS) [1] and is based on the "mirage detection of the photothermal effect invented by Boccara et al. [2] and shown to result in a spectroscopic technique of remarkable versatility and utility. Some applications of "mirage spectroscopy," mainly in the visible, and theoretical treatments, have been described [3 6]. The method has now been developed for use in the IR. The spectrometer and techniques are described in detail elsewhere [7], but it will be useful to give a brief outline of the principles. [Pg.404]


See other pages where Deflection, beam is mentioned: [Pg.1334]    [Pg.1699]    [Pg.2396]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.1170]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.59]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.77 ]




SEARCH



Beam deflection electric

Beam deflection magnetic

Beam deflection refractive index detector

Beam deflection, early instruments

Beam-deflection unit

Deflection

Laser beam deflection

Laser beam deflection method

Laser-beam deflection signal

Laser-beam deflection technique

Molecular beam deflection

Optical beam deflection

Photothermal beam deflection

Photothermal beam deflection spectroscopy

Photothermal beam deflection spectroscopy PBDS)

Photothermal beam deflection spectroscopy technique

Probe Beam Deflection Technique (PBD)

Probe beam deflection

Probe beam deflection (PBD)

Probe beam deflection technique

Rabi frequency beam deflection

Shear Stresses and Deflections in Beams

Small deflection of beams

© 2024 chempedia.info