Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculation of Model Parameters

This label is related to the consequence fuzzy labels z,. The values of Zi are multiplied by the normalized firing strengths if, according to  [Pg.401]

This layer computes the overall output as a summation of the incoming signals  [Pg.401]

The last layer defuzzifies the computed values of y, using an average weighting procedure. A backpropagation training method can be employed to find the optimal values for the parameters of the membership functions and a least squares procedure for the linear parameters of the fuzzy mles, in such a way as to minimize the error between the calculated output and the measured output. [Pg.401]

It can easily be seen that the consequence parameters can be computed from a least-squares approach. The outputy in Fig. 29.1 andEqns. (27.6) and (27.5) can be written as  [Pg.401]

In this section the batch least squares method will be briefly discussed as the solution to the linear identification problem. Suppose the physical system should be identified and an experimental input-output data set for the process is available. In linear system identification a model with the following structure is often identified  [Pg.401]


PBPK simulation via proprietary modules for the calculation of model parameters from easily obtainable chemical properties... [Pg.1076]

The sum of the squared differences between calculated and measures pressures is minimized as a function of model parameters. This method, often called Barker s method (Barker, 1953), ignores information contained in vapor-phase mole fraction measurements such information is normally only used for consistency tests, as discussed by Van Ness et al. (1973). Nevertheless, when high-quality experimental data are available. Barker s method often gives excellent results (Abbott and Van Ness, 1975). [Pg.97]

The primary purpose for expressing experimental data through model equations is to obtain a representation that can be used confidently for systematic interpolations and extrapolations, especially to multicomponent systems. The confidence placed in the calculations depends on the confidence placed in the data and in the model. Therefore, the method of parameter estimation should also provide measures of reliability for the calculated results. This reliability depends on the uncertainties in the parameters, which, with the statistical method of data reduction used here, are estimated from the parameter variance-covariance matrix. This matrix is obtained as a last step in the iterative calculation of the parameters. [Pg.102]

In addition, most devices provide operator control of settings for temperature and/or response slope, isopotential point, zero or standardization, and function (pH, mV, or monovalent—bivalent cation—anion). Microprocessors are incorporated in advanced-design meters to faciHtate caHbration, calculation of measurement parameters, and automatic temperature compensation. Furthermore, pH meters are provided with output connectors for continuous readout via a strip-chart recorder and often with binary-coded decimal output for computer interconnections or connection to a printer. Although the accuracy of the measurement is not increased by the use of a recorder, the readabiHty of the displayed pH (on analogue models) can be expanded, and recording provides a permanent record and also information on response and equiHbrium times during measurement (5). [Pg.467]

The response produced by Eq. (8-26), c t), can be found by inverting the transfer function, and it is also shown in Fig. 8-21 for a set of model parameters, K, T, and 0, fitted to the data. These parameters are calculated using optimization to minimize the squarea difference between the model predictions and the data, i.e., a least squares approach. Let each measured data point be represented by Cj (measured response), tj (time of measured response),j = 1 to n. Then the least squares problem can be formulated as ... [Pg.724]

A real-time optimization (RTO) system determines set point changes and implements them via the computer control system without intervention from unit operators. The RTO system completes all data transfer, optimization c culations, and set point implementation before unit conditions change and invahdate the computed optimum. In addition, the RTO system should perform all tasks without upsetting plant operations. Several steps are necessaiy for implementation of RTO, including determination of the plant steady state, data gathering and vahdation, updating of model parameters (if necessaiy) to match current operations, calculation of the new (optimized) set points, and the implementation of these set points. [Pg.742]

Davidson, L. Turbulence modelling and calculation of ventilation parameters in ventilated rooms. Lie. thesis. Report 86/10, Dept, of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Chalmers Universirv of Technology, Gothenburg, 1986. [Pg.1058]

Chapter 9 consists of the following in Sect. 9.2 the physical model of two-phase flow with evaporating meniscus is described. The calculation of the parameters distribution along the micro-channel is presented in Sect. 9.3. The stationary flow regimes are considered in Sect. 9.4. The data from the experimental facility and results related to two-phase flow in a heated capillary are described in Sect. 9.5. [Pg.380]

The use of fundamental parameters is attractive for various reasons. They impose fewer restrictions on the number of standards required for analysis. This simplifies the standardisation protocol for maintaining a XRF system, and permits greater flexibility in dealing with different types of materials. Inten-sity/concentration algorithms of the fundamental type, i.e. without recourse to the use of standards, have gradually developed [238-240] and are now widely available [241]. Functionality and quality of XRF software have reached a very high level, with a large variety of evaluation procedures and correction models for quantitative analysis, and calculation of fundamental parameter coefficients for effective matrix corrections. Nevertheless, there is still a need for accuracy improvement of fundamental parameters, such as the attenuation functions. [Pg.633]

Thiadiazole 1 and its derivatives were used as model compounds for the calculation of molecular parameters related to physical properties for their use in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) studies <1999EJM41, 2003IJB2583, 2005JMT27>. [Pg.569]

In the error-in-variable method, measurement errors in all variables are treated in the calculation of the parameters. Thus, EVM provides both parameter estimates and reconciled data estimates that are consistent with respect to the model. [Pg.179]

Table 9.7 shows the results of the calculations of average parameters of PBU/P for isotropic DRP, fulfilled by Serra [134] and Meijering [152], Serra used VD-method while Meijering used the Johnson-Mehl s (JM) statistical model [150] of simultaneous growth of crystals until the total filling of the whole free space was accomplished. The parameter Nv in the table is the number of PBUs in a unit of system volume, thus Nv 1 is the mean volume of a single PBU, which is related to the relative density of the packing (1—e) with an interrelation... [Pg.313]

As a general rule, simulations based on classical or quantal equations of motion may serve a useful purpose as benchmarks for model calculations. The days where such simulations may be used for routine calculations of stopping parameters are likely to lie quite a few years ahead, even with the present pace of hardware development in mind. Stopping data are potentially needed for 92X92 elemental ion-target combinations over almost ten decades of beam energy and for a considerable number of charge states, and to this adds an unlimited number of compounds and alloys. It seems wise to keep this in mind in a cost-benefit analysis of one s effort. [Pg.108]

In Fig. 1, various elements involved with the development of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms are illustrated. Generally, the objective of this effort is to predict macroscopic phenomena, e.g., species concentration profiles and heat release in a chemical reactor, from the knowledge of fundamental chemical and physical parameters, together with a mathematical model of the process. Some of the fundamental chemical parameters of interest are the thermochemistry of species, i.e., standard state heats of formation (A//f(To)), and absolute entropies (S(Tq)), and temperature-dependent specific heats (Cp(7)), and the rate parameter constants A, n, and E, for the associated elementary reactions (see Eq. (1)). As noted above, evaluated compilations exist for the determination of these parameters. Fundamental physical parameters of interest may be the Lennard-Jones parameters (e/ic, c), dipole moments (fi), polarizabilities (a), and rotational relaxation numbers (z ,) that are necessary for the calculation of transport parameters such as the viscosity (fx) and the thermal conductivity (k) of the mixture and species diffusion coefficients (Dij). These data, together with their associated uncertainties, are then used in modeling the macroscopic behavior of the chemically reacting system. The model is then subjected to sensitivity analysis to identify its elements that are most important in influencing predictions. [Pg.99]

Compared to the MGM, the easier to calculate PFM is less flexible, but provides often practically the same information compared to the PFM, because of the fit of model parameters and due to the fact that concentration and temperature gradients within the microparticles are often neglectible. [Pg.348]

Ftotal can be expressed in terms of three independent variables p, and r/ and requires the specification of model parameters iVA, /Vn, NH, x. n and r. Calculations by Leibler et at. (1983) showed that for small incompatibility, p scales as N° 6, and RB N0. Under conditions of strong segregation, for the case of symmetric diblocks considered by them, Leibler et at. (1983) found that the cmc depends exponentially on y NA = %NB, for a fixed homopolymer degree of polymerization. [Pg.169]

Ertl, P., World Wide Web-based system for the calculation of substituent parameters and substituent similarity searches, /. Molec. Graph. Model., 16(1), 11-13, 1998. [Pg.293]

Estimates of modeled parameters of particular oceanic processes of the carbon cycle range widely. For instance, from the data of various authors the estimates of assimilation of carbon from the hydrosphere in the process of photosynthesis range from 10 GtC/yr to 155 GtC/yr. The value 127.8 GtC/yr is most widely used. However, because of large variations in these estimates, calculation of the C31 coefficient is fraught with great uncertainty therefore, specifying it requires numerical experiments using other, more accurate data. [Pg.180]

MIF Management of information fluxes between SSCRO units. The dimensions of model parameters are coordinated the dimensions of input data are coordinated with the scales assumed in SSCRO. For instance, the formula 1 ppmv — 10 1 Mj(Ml(>) pg m 1, where M, is the molecular weight of the ith chemical element. Formulas of the type 1 pgO-s/m2 -> 0.467 x 10-7 atm-cm are also re-calculated. [Pg.255]

The three adjustable parameters are determined, A/kB = 90 K, Jo/kB = -36 K, and J /kB = 125 K, so as to reproduce the spin-crossover transition temperature Tc = 48 K, the virtual Jahn-Teller transition temperature rJT = 6 = 26 K, and the effective LS-HS gap in the LS phase Acff/kB = 340 K. (Note Aeff is approximated by A + 2Jx in this mean-field model.) This choice of model parameters gives a phase sequence from the LS to HS with increasing temperature, corresponding to the arrow path in Fig. 7. Temperature dependence of thermodynamic quantities (Fig. 8) is calculated along the path indicated by the arrow in Fig. 7, where the discontinuities arising from the first-order spin-crossover transition are recognized Ap0 = 0.99, AH = 0.64 kJ mol-1, and AS = 13.3 J K-1 mol-1 These theoretical... [Pg.627]

Statistical method to calculate a set of model parameters for which a model best fits the experimental data. Volume 2(2). [Pg.403]


See other pages where Calculation of Model Parameters is mentioned: [Pg.130]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.579]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.340]   


SEARCH



Calculation of model

Calculation of parameters

Model calculations

Model parameter

Parameter calculation

© 2024 chempedia.info