Butadiene, anionic copolymerization

The reactivities of substituted monomers are different from those of the unsubstituted ones. For example, in crosspropagation an electron donating methyl group introduced to the C = C bond of a vinyl monomer makes it less reactive in anionic copolymerization, while it increases its reactivity in a cationic process. Thus, in THF at 25 °C the reactivity of isoprene towards polystyrene anion is lower by about a factor of 2 than that of butadiene (only one end of this bivalent monomer is affected),... 

The general characteristics of anionic copolymerization are very similar to those of cationic copolymerization. There is a tendency toward ideal behavior in most anionic copolymerizations. Steric effects give rise to an alternating tendency for certain comonomer pairs. Thus the styrene-p-methylstyrene pair shows ideal behavior with t = 5.3, fy = 0.18, r fy = 0.95, while the styrene-a-methylstyrene pair shows a tendency toward alternation with t — 35, r% = 0.003, i ii 2 — 0.11 [Bhattacharyya et al., 1963 Shima et al., 1962]. The steric effect of the additional substituent in the a-position hinders the addition of a-methylstyrene to a-methylstyrene anion. The tendency toward alternation is essentially complete in the copolymerizations of the sterically hindered monomers 1,1-diphenylethylene and trans-, 2-diphe-nylethylene with 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and 2,3-dimethyl-l,3-butadiene [Yuki et al., 1964]. 

Anionic Copolymerization of Butadiene and Isoprene with Organolithium Initiators in Hexane... 

An alternative rationale for the unusual RLi (hydrocarbon) copolymerization of butadiene and styrene has been presented by O Driscoll and Kuntz (71). Rather than invoking selective solvation, these workers stated that classical copolymerization kinetics is sufficient to explain this copolymerization. They adapted the copolymer-composition equation, originally derived from steady-state assumptions for free-radical copolymerizations, to the anionic copolymerization of butadiene and styrene. Equation (20) describes the relationship between the instantaneous copolymer composition c/[M,]/rf[M2] with the concentrations of the two monomers in the feed, M, and M2, and the reactivity ratios, rt, r2, of the monomers. The rx and r2 values are measures of the preference of the growing chain ends for like or unlike monomers. 

The radical model cannot be applied for ionic and coordination polymerizations. With a few exceptions, termination by mutual combination of active centres does not occur. The only possibility is to measure the rate of each copolymerization independently. The situation can be greatly simplified for copolymerizations in living systems. The constants ku and k22 can usually be measured easily in homopolymerizations. Also, the coaddition constants fc12 or k2] are often directly accessible when the M] and M2 active centres can be differentiated spectroscopically or when the rate of monomer M2 (M[) consumption at M] M 2 centres can be measured. Ionic equibria, association, polarity of medium and solvation must be respected, even when their quantitative effect is not known exactly. The unusual situations confronting macromolecular chemistry will be demonstrated by the example of the anionic copolymerization of styrene with butadiene initiated by lithium alkyls in hydrocarbon medium. 

Halasa [2] reduced hysteresis in tires by anionically copolymerizing functionalized butadiene, (I), and styrene, (II), to enhance elastomer compatibility with carbon black and silica fillers. 

An examination of reported reactivity ratios (Table 6) shows that the behaviour rj > 1, r2 1 or vice versa is a common feature of anionic copolymerization. Only in copolymerizations involving the monomers 1,1-diphenylethylene and stilbene, which cannot homopolymerize, do we find <1, r2 <1 [212—215], and hence the alternating tendency so characteristic of many free radical initiated copolymerizations. Normally one monomer is much more reactive to either type of active centre in the order acrylonitrile > methylmethacrylate > styrene > butadiene > isoprene. This is the order of electron affinities of the monomers as measured polarographically in polar solvents [216, 217]. In other words, the reactivity correlates well with the overall thermodynamic stability of the product. Variations of reactivity ratio occur with different solvents and counter-ions but the gross order is predictable. 

Problem 8.15 What types of polymers will be obtained from anionic copolymerization of the following monomer pairs (a) styrene/butadiene, and (b) styrene/methyl methacrylate ... 

Selective solvation has been proved in many cases [233-235]. On the other hand, the behaviour r, 1, Y2 1 is a common feature of anionic copolymerization. One monomer is usually much more reactive to either type of active centre in the order acrylonitrile > methyl methacrylate > styrene > butadiene > isoprene, in agreement with its electron affinity [235]. 

The kinetics of copolymerization provides a partial explanation for the copolymerization behavior of styrenes with dienes. One useful aspect of living anionic copolymerizations is that stable carbanionic chain ends can be generated and the rates of their crossover reactions with other monomers measured independently of the copolymerization reaction. Two of the four rate constants involved in copolymerization correspond at least superficially to the two homopolymerization reactions of butadiene and styrene, for example, and k, respectively. The other... 

The possibilities inherent in the anionic copolymerization of butadiene and styrene by means of organolithium initiators, as might have been expected, have led to many new developments. The first of these would naturally be the synthesis of a butadiene-styrene copolymer to match (or improve upon) emulsion-prepared SBR, in view of the superior molecular weight control possible in anionic polymerization. The copolymerization behavior of butadiene (or isoprene) and styrene is shown in Table 2.15 (Ohlinger and Bandermann, 1980 Morton and Huang, 1979 Ells, 1963 Hill et al., 1983 Spirin et al., 1962). As indicated earlier, unlike the free radical type of polymerization, these anionic systems show a marked sensitivity of the reactivity ratios to solvent type (a similar effect is noted for different alkali metal counterions). Thus, in nonpolar solvents, butadiene (or isoprene) is preferentially polymerized initially, to the virtual exclusion of the styrene, while the reverse is true in polar solvents. This has been ascribed (Morton, 1983) to the profound effect of solvation on the structure of the carbon-lithium bond, which becomes much more ionic in such media, as discussed previously. The resulting polymer formed by copolymerization in hydrocarbon media is described as a tapered block copolymer it consists of a block of polybutadiene with little incorporated styrene comonomer followed by a segment with both butadiene and styrene and then a block of polystyrene. The structure is schematically represented below ... 

Electron-withdrawing substituents in anionic polymerizations enhance electron density at the double bonds or stabilize the carbanions by resonance. Anionic copolymerizations in many respects behave similarly to the cationic ones. For some comonomer pairs steric effects give rise to a tendency to altemate. The reactivities of the monomers in copolymerizations and the compositions of the resultant copolymers are subject to solvent polarity and to the effects of the counterions. The two, just as in cationic polymerizations, cannot be considered independently from each other. This, again, is due to the tightness of the ion pairs and to the amount of solvation. Furthermore, only monomers that possess similar polarity can be copolymerized by an anionic mechanism. Thus, for instance, styrene derivatives copolymerize with each other. Styrene, however, is unable to add to a methyl methacrylate anion, though it copolymerizes with butadiene and isoprene. In copolymerizations initiated by w-butyllithium in toluene and in tetrahydrofuran at-78 °C, the following order of reactivity with methyl methacrylate anions was observed. In toluene the order is diphenylmethyl methacrylate > benzyl methacrylate > methyl methacrylate > ethyl methacrylate > a-methylbenzyl methacrylate > isopropyl methacrylate > t-butyl methacrylate > trityl methacrylate > a,a -dimethyl-benzyl methacrylate. In tetrahydrofuran the order changes to trityl methacrylate > benzyl methacrylate > methyl methacrylate > diphenylmethyl methacrylate > ethyl methacrylate > a-methylbenzyl methacrylate > isopropyl methacrylate > a,a -dimethylbenzyl methacrylate > t-butyl methacrylate. 

Anionic copolymers, trans-stilbenebutadiene copolymer, trans-stilbene-isoprene copolymer, and trans-stilbene-2,3-dimethylbutadiene copolymer, copolymerized using BuLi initiator, were studied in THE at 0°C and in benzene at 40°C [89]. It was shown that the rate of monomer consumption (excluding stilbene) decreased as follows butadiene > isoprene > 2,3-dimethylbutadiene. Anionic copolymerization... 

In ionic polymerizations, the polarity of the monomers or the ions is far more important than resonance stabilization, while in free radical copolymerizations the reverse is true. For example, if > r2 in cationic copolymerization, then, by contrast, in anionic copolymerization r2 (Table 22-13). If the polarities are very different, then it is no longer possible to have either cationic or anionic copolymerization. The styryl anion, for example, still adds butadiene, but the butadienyl anion does not add styrene. Only monomers with almost identical polarity can undergo true copolymerizations (with r r2 < 1) unless complexes are formed between the active growing end and the monomer. 

The alkyllithium-initiated anionic copolymerization of diene and styrene monomers continues to be of interest because one can tailor-make copolymers with a wide range of compositional heterogeneity. Recently, kinetic studies have provided rate constant data to further clarify the factors responsible for the predominant incorporation of the less reactive diene monomer in styrene/diene copol3naerizations carried out in hydrocarbon media.They confirm that the magnitude of the rate constants for butadiene-styrene copolymerizations fall in the order results of several... 

Tapered Block Copolymers. The alkyllithium-initiated copolymerizations of styrene with dienes, especially isoprene and butadiene, have been extensively investigated and illustrate the important aspects of anionic copolymerization. As shown in Table 15, monomer reactivity ratios for dienes copolymerizing with styrene in hydrocarbon solution range from approximately 8 to 17, while the corresponding monomer reactivity ratios for styrene vary from 0.04 to 0.25. Thus, butadiene and isoprene are preferentially incorporated into the copolymer initially. This type of copolymer composition is described as either a tapered block copolymer or a graded block copolymer. The monomer sequence distribution can be described by the structures below ... 

Because of the complicating effects of counterion and solvent associated with anionic polymerization, relatively few reactivity ratios have been determined for anionic systems. Typical reactivity ratios for the anionic copolymerization of styrene and a few other monomers are shown in Table 8.3. Most of the values were determined from the copolymer composition equation [Eq. (7.11) or (7.18)]. A dramatic effect of solvent is seen with styrene-butadiene copolymerization, where a change from the nonpolar hexane to the highly solvating THF reverses the order of reactivity. Again in the case of hydrocarbon solvent, the reaction temperature shows a minimal in uence on reactivity ratios, while in the case of polar solvents, such as THF, the reactivity ratios vary considerably, which has been rationalized by considering the solvation of carbon-lithium bond. Thus as the temperature is increased (from -78°C to 25°C), the extent of solvation by THF is expected to decrease, resulting in more covalent carbon-lithium bond. 

The anionic copolymerization (AROCP) of different MSCBs with the monomer of another type capable of anionic polymerization in polar or nonpolar medium initiated by AlkLi mostly yielded random copolymers. The sequential polymerization (addition of the second monomer after polymerization of the first monomer was completed) enabled one to synthesize various block copolymers. As MSCBs, various symmetrically and unsymmetrically substituted derivatives were used. As monomers of other types, styrene, butadiene, isoprene, and 2,4-dimethylstyrene were tested [49]. 

Thermal stability of polyurethane elastomers based on a produet of the anionic copolymerization of butadiene and isoprene in the ratio of 80 20 and isoprene was first studied by DSC. The preferred eonditions (temperature of the isothermal segment and oxygen eonsumption) were revealed to determine the oxidation induction time of this type of materials. The effeet of Irganox 1010, Evemox 10, Songnox 1010 and 1010 Chinox stabilizers on the oxidation induction time has been studied. 

Studies of the copolymerizations of 1,1-diphenylethylene and dienes showed rather different behavior compared with the copolymerizations of styrene and 1,1-diphenylethylene [125, 133-136]. The monomer reactivity ratios for copolymerizations of dienes with DPE are shown in Table 7. When butadiene was copolymerized with 1,1-diphenylethylene in benzene at 40 °C with -butyl-lithium as initiator, the monomer reactivity ratio for butadiene, ri, was 54 this means that the addition of butadiene to the butadienyl anion is 54 times faster than addition of 1,1-diphenylethylene to the butadienyl anion [133]. This unreactivity of poly(butadienyl)lithium towards addition to DPE was also observed in studies of end-capping of poly(butadienyl)lithium with DPE in hydrocarbon solution (see Sect.3.3) [109, 111]. Because of this unfavorable monomer reactivity ratio, few DPE units would be incorporated into the co-... 

It was anticipated that the copolymerization of substituted 1,1-dipheny-lethylenes with dienes such as butadiene and isoprene would be complicated by the very unfavorable monomer reactivity ratio for the addition of poly(-dienyl)lithium compounds to 1,1-diphenylethylene [133, 134]. Yuki and Oka-moto [133, 134] calculated values of ri=54 and ri=29 in hydrocarbon solutions for the copolymerization of 1,1-diphenylethylene (M2) with butadiene (Mi) and isoprene (Mi), respectively. Although the corresponding values in THE are ri(butadiene)=0.13 and ri(isoprene)=0.12, this would not be an acceptable solution since THE is known to form polymers with high 1,2-microstructures [3]. Anionic copolymerizations of butadiene (Mi) with excess l-(4-dimethyla-mino-phenyl)-l-phenylethylene (M2) were conducted in benzene at room temperature for 24-48 h using scc-butyllithium as initiator [189]. Anisole, triethy-lamine and ferf-butyl methyl ether were added in ratios of [B]/[RLi]=60, 20, 30, respectively, to promote copolymerization and minimize 1,2-enchainment in the polybutadiene units. Narrow molecular weight distribution copolymers with Mn=14xl0 to 32x10 (Mw/Mn=1.02-1.03) and 8, 12, and 30 amine... 

Diblock copolymers made of hydrogenated PBu and PA6 units (HPBU-PA6) have been s)mthesized in a similar manner (but hydrogenating the hydroxyl-terminated PBu) and used as compatibilizers in low-density poly(ethylene)/PA6 blends (PE/PAfi). " The diblock copolymer exhibited a very relevant interfacial activity, with a reduction of particle size and an improvement of the interfacial adhesion between the incompatible phases. Also hydroxyl-terminated styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) or poly(E-caprolactone), after reaction with diisocyanates, were anionically copolymerized with CL in order to get block copolymers with improved mechanical properties. ... 

A further distinguishing feature of ionic copolymerizations is the strong dependence of reactivity ratios upon the nature of the solvent and the counter-ion (and hence the initiator). These effects can be dramatic and can lead to a reversing of the order of relative monomer reactivities (cf. reactivity ratios for anionic copolymerization of styrene with butadiene and isoprene in different solvents). 

The reactivity of a combination of monomers depends a great deal on the nature of the polymerizing center. For example, the reactivity ratios of butadiene (1) and styrene (2) are quite different in an anionic copolymerization (r, =5, Tj = 0.04) and in a radical copolymerization [r- = 1.39, Tj = 0.78). If a copolymerization is performed with a 50/50 mixture of the two, what are the initial compositions of the polymers formed in the two cases ... 

AlkyUithium compounds are primarily used as initiators for polymerizations of styrenes and dienes (52). These initiators are too reactive for alkyl methacrylates and vinylpyridines. / -ButyUithium [109-72-8] is used commercially to initiate anionic homopolymerization and copolymerization of butadiene, isoprene, and styrene with linear and branched stmctures. Because of the high degree of association (hexameric), -butyIUthium-initiated polymerizations are often effected at elevated temperatures (>50° C) to increase the rate of initiation relative to propagation and thus to obtain polymers with narrower molecular weight distributions (53). Hydrocarbon solutions of this initiator are quite stable at room temperature for extended periods of time the rate of decomposition per month is 0.06% at 20°C (39). 

Currently, more SBR is produced by copolymerizing the two monomers with anionic or coordination catalysts. The formed copolymer has better mechanical properties and a narrower molecular weight distribution. A random copolymer with ordered sequence can also be made in solution using butyllithium, provided that the two monomers are charged slowly. Block copolymers of butadiene and styrene may be produced in solution using coordination or anionic catalysts. Butadiene polymerizes first until it is consumed, then styrene starts to polymerize. SBR produced by coordinaton catalysts has better tensile strength than that produced by free radical initiators. 

The distinction between the rates of homo- and copolymerization apparently is misapprehended by some workers. For example, a recent review 141) discusses the results of McGrath 142) who reported butadiene to be more reactive in polymerization in hexane than isoprene, whether with respect to lithium polybutadiene or polyisoprene, although the homopropagation of lithium polyisoprene in hexane was found to be faster than of polybutadiene. The miscomprehension led to the erroneous statement14l) McGrath 142) results regarding the rate constants for butadiene and isoprene place in clear perspective the bizarre assertion 140) that butadiene will be twice as reactive as isoprene (in anionic co-polymerization). 

The observation of Tsuji et al. 148) concerned with copolymerization of 1- or 2-phenyl butadiene with styrene or butadiene illustrates again the importance of the distinction between the classic, direct monomer addition to the carbanion, and the addition involving coordination with Li4. The living polymer of 1- or 2-phenyl butadiene initiated by sec-butyl lithium forms a block polymer on subsequent addition of styrene or butadiene provided that the reaction proceeds in toluene. However, these block polymers are not formed when the reaction takes place in THF. The relatively unreactive anions derived from phenyl butadienes do not add styrene or butadiene, while the addition eventually takes place in hydrocarbons on coordination of the monomers with Li4. The addition through the coordination route is more facile than the classic one. 

---