Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Basic analytes peptides

The pH value also affects the ionization of acidic and basic analytes and their electromigration. Since this migration can be opposite to that of the electroos-motic flow, it may both improve and impair the separation. This effect is particularly important in the separation of peptides and proteins that bear a number of ionizable functionalities. Hjerten and Ericson used monolithic columns with two different levels of sulfonic acid functionalities to control the proportion of EOF and electromigration. Under each specific set of conditions, the injection and detection points had to be adjusted to achieve and monitor the separation [117]. Another option consists of total suppression of the ionization. For example, an excellent separation of acidic drugs has been achieved in the ion-suppressed mode at a pH value of 1.5 [150]. [Pg.42]

Capillary coating can also stabilize the migration times and resolutions. This is in particular necessary in the case of peptide and protein analysis, because proteins tend to stick to capillary walls. Often low-concentration polyethylene oxide solutions are recommended as well as dynamic bilayer coating formed by a non-covalent adsorption of polybrene and polyvinylsulfonate (PVS). Due to the stability of the EOF, the variation of intra- and intercapillary migration time was less than 1% relative standard deviation (RSD) with basic analytes and peptides. [Pg.248]

The interaction of analytes with the residual silanols can be a nuisance to the user of reversed-phase packings. They make the retention behavior of basic analytes more difficult to interpret and less predictable. In some extreme cases, especially for basic peptides, plots of the retention factor versus the percent organic modifier exhibit a minimum while for pure hydrophobic interaction, a monotonous decline with increasing organic content of the mobile phase is expected. The increased tailing caused by the interaction of silanols with polar, but especially basic, compounds makes peak integration more difficult and reduces column performance. [Pg.307]

One of the strengths of the lucky-survivor model is that it can be equally well appUed to account for the formation of negative ions (if deprotonable groups are present) and positive ions from basic analytes such as peptides and proteins (in solution precharged by protonation Eqs 1.9 and 1.10), as well as for positive (if protonable groups are present) and negative ions from acidic analytes (in solution precharged by deprotonation Eqs 1.11 and 1.12) such as nucleic acids ... [Pg.16]

The ion formation may occur in the bulk solution before the electrospray process takes place or in the gas phase by protonation or salt adduct formation, or by an electrochemical redox reaction. Polar compounds already exist in solution as ions therefore, the task of the electrospray is to separate them from their counterions. This is the case of many inorganic and organic species and all those compounds that show acidic or basic properties. Proteins, peptides, nucleotides, and many other bio- and pharmaceutical analytes are typical examples of substances that can be detected as proto-nated or deprotonated species. [Pg.236]

For the analytical characterization of sulfated tyrosine peptides, spectroscopic methods as well as amino acid analysis and, more recently, mass spectrometry are employed. In Table 2 the spectroscopic data of tyrosine 0-sulfate are compared to those of the related sulfonic acid derivatives as possible byproducts in the chemical sulfation of the tyrosine or tyrosine peptides.[361 In the course of the synthesis of tyrosine 0-sulfate peptides and, particularly in the final deprotection step, desulfation may occur which limits the characterization of the final compounds in terms of quantitative identification of the tyrosine 0-sulfate. This is achieved by amino acid analyses of basic hydrolysates of the sulfated tyrosine peptides or preferably by analyses of the enzymatic hydrolysates with aminopeptidase M or leucine-aminopeptidase. [Pg.429]

Several different analytical and ultra-micropreparative CEC approaches have been described for such peptide separations. For example, open tubular (OT-CEC) methods have been used 290-294 with etched fused silicas to increase the surface area with diols or octadecyl chains then bonded to the surface.1 With such OT-CEC systems, the peptide-ligand interactions of, for example, angiotensin I-III increased with increasing hydrophobicity of the bonded phase on the capillary wall. Porous layer open tubular (PLOT) capillaries coated with anionic polymers 295 or poly(aspartic acid) 296 have also been employed 297 to separate basic peptides on the inner wall of fused silica capillaries of 20 pm i.d. When the same eluent conditions were employed, superior performance was observed for these PLOT capillaries compared to the corresponding capillary zone electrophoresis (HP-CZE) separation. Peptide mixtures can be analyzed 298-300 with OT-CEC systems based on octyl-bonded fused silica capillaries that have been coated with (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APS), as well as with pressurized CEC (pCEC) packed with particles of similar surface chemistry, to decrease the electrostatic interactions between the solute and the surface, coupled to a mass spectrometer (MS). In the pressurized flow version of electrochromatography, a pLC pump is also employed (Figure 26) to facilitate liquid flow, reduce bubble formation, and to fine-tune the selectivity of the separation of the peptide mixture. [Pg.619]

Most ILMs are less acidic than the commonly used acidic matrices alone. This leads to the possibility to synthesize matrices with only weakly acidic or even neutral or basic pH values [48]. These matrices may be beneficial for the analysis of acid-labile compounds [40]. For example, these matrices were successfully used for the measurement of acid-labile compounds like sulphated oligosaccharides, which are a class of compounds with high biological relevance [49]. Using classical preparations, the detection of these challenging analytes was only possible after derivatization or in the form of noncovalent complexes formed with basic peptides. Upon use of the ILM,... [Pg.389]

The scope of the use of mass spectrometry in the protein analysis has grown enormously in the past few decades. MS has become an important analytical tool in biological and biochemical research. Its speed, accuracy and sensitivity are unmatched by conventional analytical techniques. The variety of ionization methods permits the analysis of peptide or protein molecules from below 500 Da to as big as 300 Da (Biemann 1990 Lahm and Langen 2000). Basically, a mass spectrometer is an instrument that produces ions and separates them in the gas phase according to their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The basic principle of operation is to introduce sample to volatilization and ionization source, and then the molecular fragments from the ionization of the sample are detected by various kinds of detector and the data are analyzed with computer software. [Pg.151]

The second method is sandwich method which was developed from the two-layer method and used first for the analysis of the single mammalian cell lysates [67], The first thin layer is formed by the matrix-only solution. It is followed by deposition of the analyte solution and then deposition of second layer of matrix on the top of analyte layer. The sample is basically sandwiched between the two matrix layers and preparation results in a matrix-sample-matrix sandwich. This method is specifically used for detecting protein and peptides [67-69], The three-layer matrix-sample preparation method was also used as matrix-matrix-sample mode [70],... [Pg.403]

The wall of a fused silica capillary, containing silanol groups, has been identified as a potential site of interaction for solutes in electrophoretic measurements. In particular, adsorption of proteins, peptides and other basic compounds has been more specifically addressed [1-3]. In the ideal situation, the interaction is strictly chromatographic so that the process is reversible with the net result being a loss in the observed efficiency for CE [2,4]. A more serious problem can result when there is irreversible adsorption of the analyte on the capillary wall leading to a lack of repro-... [Pg.255]


See other pages where Basic analytes peptides is mentioned: [Pg.58]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.1099]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.1125]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.795]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.382]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.394 ]




SEARCH



Basic analyte*

Basic analytes

Peptide Analytes

Peptide basicity

© 2024 chempedia.info