Baghouse efficiency

The effect of bag failure on baghouse efficiency can be described by the following equations ... 

Dry-Throwaway Processes. Dry-throwaway systems were the precursor of processes that removed SO2 iu the ductwork, eg, the BCZ and IDS processes. Here, however, the device is a spray chamber similar to the wet scmbbers such as the three modules of the Colstrip iastallation (Fig. 12). Into the upper portion of the chamber a slurry or clear solution containing sorbent is sprayed. Water evaporates from the droplets, the sorbent reacts with SO2 both before and after drying, and the dry product is removed ia a downstream baghouse or ESP (72). Unfortunately, dry scmbbiag is much less efficient than wet scmbbiag and lime, iastead of the much less expensive limestone, is required to remove SO2 effectively. Consequentiy, a search has been conducted for more reactive sorbents (72—75). 

Baking Particulates (dust), CO, SO2, hydrocarbons, and fluorides High-efficiency cyclone, electrostatic precipitators, scrubbers, catalytic combustion or incinerators, flares, baghouse... 

Pot charging Particulates (dust), CO, HF, SO, CF4, and hydrocarbons High-efficiency cyclone, baghouse, spray towers, floating-bed scrubber, electrostatic precipitators, chemisorption, wet electrostatic precipitators... 

Particulate Emissions To meet environmental regulations, AFBC boilers, and some PFBC boilers, use a back-end particulate collector, such as a baghouse or an electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Compared to PC units, the ash from FBCs has higher resistivity and is finer Decause the flue-gas path contains cyclones. Both factors result in reduced ESP collection efficiency with AFBC units, but good performance has been achieved with PFBC units, where the SO3 present in the flue gas lowers the ash resistivity. In general, however, bag-houses are the preferred collection devices for both AFBC and PFBC apphcations. 

Beryllium oxides Baghouses or high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters... 

Control of particulate matter emissions from the kilns, dryers, grinders, etc. is by means of standard devices and systems (1) multiple cyclones (80% efficiency), (2) ESPs (95% -I- efficiency), (3) multiple cyclones followed by ESPs (97.5% efficiency), and (4) baghouses (99.8% efficiency). 

Baghouses are preferred over venturi scrubbers for controlling particulate matter emissions from loading and pushing operations because of the higher removal efficiencies. ESPs are effective for final tar removal from coke oven gas. Stack air emissions should be monitored continuously for particulate matter. Alternatively, opacity measurements of stack gases can suffice. Fugitive emissions should be monitored annually for VOCs. 

Gas Filtration Vendors are the primary source for sizing baghouses, however the process engineer should at the very least make an estimate of the pressure drop requirements for an intended system. The pressure drop will, of course, provide information needed on the approximate size of the fan needed, and the energy requirements needed to operate a system. In fact, pressure drop is the primary parameter in establishing particle removal efficiency for a fabric filtration unit, and hence, is usually the starting place for discussions with the equipment supplier. 

Fabric filters (baghouscs) represent a second accepted method for separating particles from a flue gas stream. In a baghouse, the dusty gas flows into and through a number of filter bags, and the particles are retained on the fabric. Different types are available to collect various kinds of dust with high efficiency. 

The primary measure of baghouse-system performance is its ability to consistently remove dust and other particulate matter from the dirty-air stream. Pressure drop and collection efficiency determine the effectiveness of these systems. 

One of the more common problems associated with baghouses is improper installation of filter media. Therefore, it is important to follow the instmctions provided by the vendor. If the filter bags are not properly installed and sealed, overall efficiency and effectiveness are significantly reduced. 

Special baghouse filters are designed for high-efficiency filtration with a unique three-layer construction. The dust filtration is effective for a wide range of particle sizes. The layered design... 

Exhaust gases leaving the kiln pass through highly efficient air pollution control devices such as baghouse filters or electrostatic precipitators. The high temperatures required to make cement destroy 99.99% or more of the organic hazardous wastes. The content of hydrocarbons... 

Baghouse systems efficiently control particulate emissions from grinding and blending processes. Vents from feed hoppers, crushers, pulverizers, blenders, mills, and cyclones are typically routed to baghouses for product recovery. This method is preferable to using wet scrubbers. However, even scrubber effluent can be largely eliminated by recirculation. 

Emissions of sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulates from coal combustion are problems of increasing concern and regulation. Coal combustion contributes about 25 percent of the particulate matter, 25 percent of the sulfur oxides, and 5 percent of the nitrogen oxides emitted to the atmosphere. Much of the particulates are derived from the mineral content of the coal, but some particulates also result from sulfur and nitrogen oxides that react to form various sulfate and nitrate salts. A major concern about particulate matter is that the smallest particles are respirable and may pose a health hazard. Particulate matter is recovered in most power plants by the use of electrostatic precipitators, which have been developed to very high efficiencies (>99%). Other methods of particulate removal include baghouses and cyclone collectors. 

---