Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Axiom, definition

In modern axiomatic theory, postulates and axioms are defined simply as given statements. By the definition of an axiomatic theory the concept of truth is not considered relevant to its construction. If we can derive a theory which seems to mirror reality as reported by our current experimental knowledge, then we consider the postulates to be successful in some sense of the word. If the theory derived from the postulates clash drastically with our observations, the postulates can be thrown away as non-relevant . If the differences are slight, or if the theory predicts new experiments which should show differences from what the intuitive theory would predict, we can even call the axiomatic theory interesting . [Pg.195]

Why More Systems Haven t Been Axiom it i zed. Geometry is unique in that it can be expressed in a simple logic, the results are either true or false, and that the actual experiments were capable of being done with thought alone. In chemistry there was not sufficient knowledge to enumerate the basic definitions and postulates. The recent explosion of knowledge in chemistry has made it feasible to begin the process of axiomatization of chemical theories. [Pg.195]

The trend was definitely toward the principle of fixed composition, but the empirical evidence in its support was still unreliable and allowed room for the doubts of the honest sceptic. Credit is usually given to Joseph-Louis Proust for bringing the law of definite proportions into the continuing consciousness of the chemical community. Proust thought his data justified the assumption of fixed composition and took it as a firm operating principle, very much as Lavoisier had assumed the conservation principle as an axiom. For example, Proust claimed that the quantity of copper oxide prepared from copper carbonate was always the same whatever process used, and that every chemical entity was characterized by a fixed composition. [Pg.231]

Exercise 1.21 Show that multiplication of equivalence classes of functions (as defined in Section 1.7) is well defined. Show that addition and multiplication of equivalence classes of functions satisfy some but not all the standard field axioms (such as the distributive law, existence ofO, etc.). The list of field axioms is available in many texts, including [Ru76, Definition 1.12]. Which axioms hold, and which fail ... [Pg.40]

In this chapter we introduce complex linear algebra, that is, linear algebra where complex numbers are the scalars for scalar multiplication. This may feel like review, even to readers whose experience is limited to real linear algebra. Indeed, most of the theorems of linear algebra remain true if we replace R by C because the axioms for a real vector space involve only addition and multiplication of real numbers, the definition and basic theorems can be easily adapted to any set of scalars where addition and multiplication are defined and reasonably well behaved, and the complex numbers certainly fit the bill. However, the examples are different. Furthermore, there are theorems (such as Proposition 2.11) in complex linear algebra whose analogues over the reals are false. We will recount but not belabor old theorems, concentrating on new ideas and examples. The reader may find proofs in any number of... [Pg.41]

We illustrate how to compute the P-polynomial by evaluating a couple of examples. First let Lq consist of the oriented unlink of two components which is illustrated in Figure 4. Then L+ and L are as shown in the figure. Now we use the second axiom of the definition of the P-polynomial, together with the observation that both L+ and L are topologically equivalent to the unknot, in order to obtain the equation / + Z1 + mP(Lo) = 0. Hence, we conclude that P(Lo) = -m l + I"1). [Pg.10]

We have not attempted to lay out a formal axiom scheme, but it will be well to observe that the definitions given here are consistent with the axioms given in Wei s treatment [9]. Indeed, though his first axiom (the conservation... [Pg.166]

Important meaningful facts, like the Pythagorean theorem, Eire then transformed into easily overlooked definitions. Of course, the substitution of definitions for theorems decreases the number of pages in textbooks, but then it does not leave the student any hope of understanding why it is necessary to consider these particular definitions. Moreover, it creates the impression that mathematics is the study of corollaries of arbitrary axioms. [Pg.51]

There is of course a more familiar equivalent definition where mult is the only map mentioned as such. To simplify what follows, we have built the existence assertions into the structure, so that the only axioms needed are equations (commutative diagrams). [Pg.18]

Homberg used this axiom in chemistry to classify salts by the ana-lytic/synthetic procedures. Acids combined with fixed alkali salts or lix-ivial salts, earthly or metallic alkalis, and metals to produce mixed salts [sels mixtes], also called middle salts [sels moyens], which were in part fixed, in part volatile.Homberg characterized the production of middle salts as fixation of volatility rather than as neutralization of acidity, diverging somewhat from Lemery s definition of the term. The attention to the physical rather than the chemical characteristics of substances and their reactions set him apart from most chemists. Applying the physical criteria of volatility and fixedness, he placed sal ammoniacs (another commonly accepted salted salt ) in a separate category because they had two volatile components, which rendered them volatile ... [Pg.87]

Despite the general acceptance of Euclidean geometry, there appeared to be a problem with the parallel postulate as to whether or not it really was a postulate or that it could be deduced from other definitions, propositions, or axioms. The history of these attempts to prove the parallel postulate lasted for nearly 20 centuries, and after numerous failures, gave rise to the establishment of Non-Euclidean geometry and the independence of the parallel postulate. [Pg.570]

Entropy owes its existence to the second law, from wliicli it arises in much the same way as internal energy does from the first law. Equation (5.11) is the ultimate source of all equations that relate the entropy to measurable quantities. It does not represent a definition of entropy there is none in the context of classical themiodynamics. What it provides is tlie means for calculating changes in tills property. Its essential nature is summarized by the following axiom ... [Pg.158]

From the last formula we see that if (if, if) > 0, then (f, f) < 0, and vice versa, which contradicts axiom (A.36). Therefore, we have to introduce a different definition for the inner product of two vectors in the complex space. It is defined as a complexvalued functional, (f,g), with the properties... [Pg.547]

My purpose here is to join these two lines of thought in a single comprehensive theory. The theory is not a formal one of the type most frequently encountered in textbooks, with attendant definitions, axioms, postulates, and laws. Rather it is an informal theory of the sort that most often guides psychological research. At its heart is the premise that a schema consists of several different kinds of knowledge, as described later. A second and equally essential premise is that schema functioning involves both parallel and sequential processing. Both of these ideas have been noticeably absent from previous theories. [Pg.38]

It follows that, if the superoperator M is self-adjoint with respect to any general binary product, it has always real eigenvalues, and its eigen-operators are orthogonal with respect to this binary product. In the definition (3.2), we have defined the general binary product in terms of the HS binary product, but it is evident that we could have used any binary product satisfying the first four axioms as a starting point or reference binary product. ... [Pg.320]

Alors. J definit une topologic sur C. Tcl ensemble des ideaux existe. Par exemple, soit S un sous-ensemble de A ferme sous multiplication qui ne contient aucun diviseur de ze ro. L ensemble J = I un ideal tel que I, st ,S satisfait les axiomes ci-... [Pg.15]

Since the first step, i. e. definition of the discipline and its goals, has already been dealt with in the introductory paragraphs, it is possible to proceed with the articulation of the implicit assumptions and axioms of synthesis. [Pg.4]

Proof. — The axioms MCI-MGS are obvious from the definitions. The (trivial cofibration)/(fibration) part of MG4 is the definition of Fa. The (cofibration)/(trivial fibration) part of MG5 follows immediately from the corresponding fact in the simplicial case since an trivial fibration is a trivial A-fibration. The (trivial cofibration)/(fibration) part of the axiom MC5 follows by the transfinite analog of the small object argument from Corollary 2.20 in exactly the same way as in [18, Lemma 2.5]. The (cofibration)/(trivial fibration) part of MC4 follows from MGS and Lemma 2.10 by Joyal trick (see [18, p. 64]). [Pg.33]

The description was mostly in terms of ad hoc axioms (i.e., not definitional axioms involving function declarations). The axiomatic style was more or less forced upon us by the high degree of non-determinism inside the client-and host units. It is well known that such collections of large numbers of ad hoc axioms are prone to be inconsistent [COR "95]. [Pg.52]

Thermodynamics is an empirical science. The quintessence of all practical knowledge is condensed in three fundamental laws (axioms), which are valid because so far they have not been foimd to be false. (Some textbooks quote an additional zero law concerning the definition of thermodynamic temperature.)... [Pg.22]

The second modeling mistake illustrated is the definition of the starting raw material as intermediate material, thus eliminated according to axiom (S2) because of the absence of any operating unit producing it. Subsequently, all the initial structure is excluded from the consideration indicated as ERROR There is no maximal structure. by algorithm MSG in software PNS Studio in Fig. 9.7. [Pg.214]

All science is based on a number of axioms (postulates). Quantum mechanics is based on a system of axioms that have been formulated to be as simple as possible and yet reproduce experimental results. Axioms are not supposed to be proved, their justification is efficiency. Quantum mechanics, the foundations of which date from 1925-26, still represents the basic theory of phenomena within atoms and molecules. This is the domain of chemistry, biochemistry, and atomic and nuclear physics. Further progress (quantum electrodynamics, quantum field theory, elementary particle theory) permitted deeper insights into the structure of the atomic nucleus, but did not produce any fundamental revision of our understanding of atoms and molecules. Matter as described at a non-relativistic quantum mechanics represents a system of electrons and nuclei, treated as point-like particles with a definite mass and electric charge, moving in three-dimensional space and interacting by electrostatic forces. This model of matter is at the core of quantum chemistry. Fig. 1.2. [Pg.15]

Since impedance spectra are continuous functions, determining the distance between two impedance spectra means determining the distance between functions. A reasonable definition of a distance is a metric. Any metric on the function space of impedance spectra must fulfill the following three axioms (A1)-(A3) for the distanee d for arbitrary continuous... [Pg.2]

The above axiom may also be viewed as the most liberal definition imaginable for oxidation numbers, and one might call a set of oxidation numbers, chosen for a particular puipose and restricted only by the condition of the grand sum rule, a set of ad hoc oxidation numbers. Ad hoc oxidation numbers may well be fractional, but this is of no interest in this paper s context. [Pg.216]


See other pages where Axiom, definition is mentioned: [Pg.211]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.1314]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.10]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.194 ]




SEARCH



Axioms

© 2024 chempedia.info