Assays sample preparation

A matrix of assays is presented to display the study design over the appropriate factors. For this example (Table 1), the factors are Operator, Day, and Assay. For this example. Assay is defined as the interaction between Operator and Day. Note that this matrix shows a hierarchical, or nested, model as Assay (sample preparation) is uniquely defined by Operator and Day.]... 

In conventional population cell-based assays, sample preparation involves several steps, including lysis, filtration of non-solubUized cellular material, labeling of the analytes of interest, and sample purification. However, to prevent dilution of the extremely small samples in single-cell analysis, filtration and purification are not typically integrated in chemical cytometiy methods. This section briefly describes the various cell lysis techniques which have been implemented in microfluidics for more detail, please see On-Chip Cell Lysis. 

Sample preparation for the modified Fischer assay technique, a standard method to determine the Hquid yields from pyrolysis of oil shale, is necessary to achieve reproducible results. A 100-g sample of >230 fim (65 mesh) of oil shale is heated in a Fischer assay retort through a prescribed temperature range, eg, ca 25.5—500°C, for 50 min and then soaked for 20 min. The organic Hquid which is collected is the Fischer assay yield (7). The Fischer assay is not an absolute method, but a quaHtative assessment of the oil that may be produced from a given sample of oil shale (8). Retorting yields of greater than 100% of Fischer assay are possible. 

The need to understand the fate of pesticides in the environment has necessitated the development of analytical methods for the determination of residues in environmental media. Adoption of methods utilizing instrumentation such as gas chro-matography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has allowed the detection of minute amounts of pesticides and their degradation products in environmental samples. Sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have also been important in the development of more reliable and sensitive analytical methods. 

Consistent with other analytical methods, immunoassays must be validated to ensure that assay results are accurate. Initial validation involves an evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the immunoassay, while later validation includes comparison with a reference method. Because a goal of immunoassays is to minimize sample preparation, validation also includes testing the effects of sample matrices and(or) sample cleanup methods on results. The final steps in validation involve testing a limited number of samples containing incurred residues to determine if the method provides reliable data. 

An immunoassay was developed to determine the penicillinase stable isoxazolyl penicillins cloxacillin and dicloxacillin in milk by Usleber et alJ The assay detected lOpgkg" of cloxacillin and 30pgkg of dicloxacillin with recoveries of 102% and 84%, respectively. The calibration curve was prepared by fortifying skimmed milk powder (lOOgL ) with standards. Fortified samples were prepared in pasteurized milk and analyzed directly after decreaming by centrifugation. This immunoassay was performed with minimal sample preparation, probably because the extensive water solubility of the penicillins prevents problems associated with more lipid-soluble analytes. 

Kennedy et al. developed a lasalocid immunoassay for application to residues in chicken meat and liver samples. The antibody was specific and did not cross-react with salinomycin, maduramicin, or monensin. Sample preparation consisted of homogenization in aqueous acetonitrile, removal of fat from an aliquot of the aqueous acetonitrile by hexane extraction, and evaporation of acetonitrile. The sample was then reconstituted with assay buffer. Liver required an additional solid phase extraction step. The LOQ was 0.02 xgkg for muscle and 0.15 agkg for liver. These workers were able to use the system to determine the half-life of lasalocid in the tissues. 

During the last few years, miniaturization has become a dominant trend in the analysis of low-level contaminants in food and environmental samples. This has resulted in a significant reduction in the volume of hazardous and expensive solvents. Typical examples of miniaturization in sample preparation techniques are micro liquid/liquid extractions (in-vial) and solvent-free techniques such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Combined with state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation, this trend has resulted in faster analyses, higher sample throughputs and lower solvent consumption, whilst maintaining or even increasing assay sensitivity. 

The conventional analytical process is comprised of sampling — sample preparation —> analysis —> calculation —> approval of results — report — decision.93 The introduction of productivity measurements to focus attention on continuous improvement and improving the reliability of assays to eliminate re-analysis can aid in re-engineering the process for greater efficiency.93 Automation is another important aspect of improving efficiency.94 The rate-limiting steps in many industrial laboratories, however, may precede or... 

Assessing the resources available for method development should also be done before beginning a project. The resources available include not only HPLCs, detectors, and columns, but also tools for sample preparation, data capture and analysis software, trained analysts, and especially samples representative of the ultimate analyte matrix. Also, it should be considered whether a fast, secondary method of analysis can be used to optimize sample preparation steps. Often, a simple colorimetric or fluorimetric assay, without separation, can be used for this purpose. A preliminary estimate of the required assay throughput will help to guide selection of methods. 

The design of an assay is, in large measure, prospective quality assurance. The factors that are likely to affect the results of the assay must be defined and controlled to the greatest extent possible. Once the general outlines of an assay have been established, key features should be examined, including optimization of sample preparation, sample stability, choice of standards, assay range, assay repeatability, optimization of separation, and optimization of detection. 

A general feature of optimum sample preparation is that maximum recovery of the analyte is observed. Consider a graph of recovery vs. variation in one experimental condition. Figure 5 shows such a graph, with temperature as the experimental variable. The curve exhibits a maximum and a decline on either side of the maximum. The assay will be most reproducible at the point of zero slope, i.e., at the maximum recovery, because small variations in conditions will not affect the result. In hydrolysis of a protein to its constituent amino acids, for example, it will be found that at very high temperatures or long hydrolysis times, degradation of the product amino acids occurs, while at low temperatures or short hydrolysis times, the protein... 

For the detection of slow-acting biological agents (which may not produce symptoms for several days), the system response time would depend on the frequency of sampling and analysis. The frequency of sampling and analysis would be determined by factors such as the cost of the assay, the frequency with which critical reagents need to be replaced, the robustness of the detector, and so on. The minimum response time would be determined by the time required to collect a sample, prepare it for analysis, conduct the assay, and report the results. In the event of an alarm from a detector with a significant false-alarm rate, additional time would be required to determine its validity and to decide on an appropriate response. 

Standardized procedures were adopted with regard to sample preparation, recovery of toxicant, and chemical assay. In order to determine the nature and magnitude of penetrated residues, it was necessary to disassociate all extra-surface residues. The techniques originally developed to effect this separation and which were used in most of the DDT penetration studies have been described by Gunther 11). Certain modifications which have been developed subsequently in connection with the parathion studies are described in detail below since this phase of penetration studies assumes singular importance (see also 14). 

Indeed, a bDNA assay for diagnosis of African trypanosomiasis was developed and compared with buffy coat microscopy for detection of T brucei in human blood samples (Harris etal., 1996). Two repetitive DNA sequences found only in the T. brucei complex, a 177-bp satellite repeat and the ribosomal mobile element, were selected as targets in the bDNA assay. The assay used the standard bDNA components capture probes, target probes, amplifier molecules, and alkaline phosphatase-labeled probes. Various blood fractions and sample preparation methods were examined. Ultimately, buffy coat samples resulted in the highest sensitivity. Although typanosomes do not infect leukocytes, they cosediment with them. 

Kobylinska et al. [62] described a high performance liquid chromatographic analytical method for the determination of miconazole in human plasma using solid-phase extraction. The method uses a solid-phase extraction as the sample preparation step. The assay procedure is sensitive enough to measure concentrations of miconazole for 8 h in a pharmacokinetic study of Mikonazol tablets and Daktarin tablets in human volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of the two formulations was equivalent. 

---