Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Advection: definition

Summary. In summary, when modeling with the fugacity concept, all equilibria can be treated by Z values (one for each compartment) and all reaction, advection and transport processes can be treated by D values. The only other quantities requiring definition are compartment volumes and emission rates or initial concentrations. A major advantage is that since all D quantities are in equivalent units they can be compared directly and the dominant processes identified. By converting diverse processes such as volatilization, sediment deposition, fish uptake and stream flow into identical units, their relative importance can be established directly and easily. Further, algebraic manipulation... [Pg.180]

We might properly refer to this value as the apparent Peclet number, because by many formal definitions the Peclet number accounts for the relative importance of advection and molecular diffusion, without mention of hydrodynamic dispersion. [Pg.294]

Molecular diffusion deals with the relative motion of one kind of atom or molecule against a set of reference molecules. As explained in the introduction to this chapter (remember the trip in the dining car through the Swiss Alps), the reference system itself may move relative to some chosen coordinates. We called such directed motion advection. If one really looks very closely and wants to use crystal-clear definitions, it turns out that there is more than one way to choose the reference system. Each choice leads to a different separation between diffusion and advection, resulting in different diffusion coefficients. [Pg.798]

Remembering the definition and meaning of the Peclet number (Eq. 22-11 a), this result is not really a big surprise. In fact, the left-hand side of Eq. 23-37 is the Peclet number for an advective (v /diffusive (Ez) flux over distance h. [Pg.1084]

To normalize the governing equations, we introduce a dimensionless position, z = x/a, and two dimensionless dependent variables,/ =/// and u = ua/DD. Note that the normalized velocity m is equivalent to a local Peclet number, indicating the relative magnitudes of the advective and diffusive fluxes of the reactive species. Applying these definitions to the transport equations yields the dimensionless governing equations... [Pg.187]

In these equations fi is the coluirm mass of dry air, V is the velocity (u, v, w), and (jf) is a scalar mixing ratio. These equations are discretized in a finite volume formulation, and as a result the model exactly (to machine roundoff) conserves mass and scalar mass. The discrete model transport is also consistent (the discrete scalar conservation equation collapses to the mass conservation equation when = 1) and preserves tracer correlations (c.f. Lin and Rood (1996)). The ARW model uses a spatially 5th order evaluation of the horizontal flux divergence (advection) in the scalar conservation equation and a 3rd order evaluation of the vertical flux divergence coupled with the 3rd order Runge-Kutta time integration scheme. The time integration scheme and the advection scheme is described in Wicker and Skamarock (2002). Skamarock et al. (2005) also modified the advection to allow for positive definite transport. [Pg.42]

Baklanov A, Sprensen JH (2001) Parameterisation of radionuclide deposition in atmospheric long-range transport modelling. Phys Chem Earth (B) 26(10) 787-799 Bott A (1989a) A positive definite advection scheme obtained by non-linear renormalization of the advective fluxes. Mon Weather Rev 117 1006—1015 Bott A (1989b) Reply. Mon Weather Rev 117 2633-2636... [Pg.73]

Bott A (1989) A Positive Definite Advection Scheme Obtained by Nonlinear Renormalization of the Advective Eluxes. AMS 117 1006-1015... [Pg.177]

An important characteristic of a property distribution is encapsulated in the Peclet number, Pe = ULIk, which is the ratio of diffusive time-scale to advective timescale of the system. In this definition, U and L are the characteristic velocity and length scales of the flow. The Peclet number is a measure of the relative importance of advection versus diffusion, where a large number indicates an advectively dominated distribution, and a small number indicates a diffuse flow. Numerical modeling indicates that certain tracer distributions, in particular tracer-tracer relationships, are significantly affected by the Peclet number, and consequently can be used to determine the nature of the fluid flow (Jenkins, 1988 Musgrave, 1985, 1990). [Pg.3077]

FIGURE 3-19 Solutions to the advection-dispersion equation (Eq. [1-5]) for a conservative solute. Cases for continuous input of mass beginning at time t = 0 are adapted from references cited, assuming x and/or r are much larger than D/v r equals (x2 + y2Dx/Dy)m in two dimensions or (x2 + y2Dx/Dy + z2Dx/Dz)m in three dimensions. Note that the definitions of M and M vary with the number of dimensions. [Pg.237]

There are many choices for numerical schemes for the advection of tracers. Generally, a compromise between numerical accuracy and computational effort is chosen. Especially, for ecosystem models it is important, that the advection scheme is positive definite. Positive... [Pg.587]

Smith GD (1985) Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations Finite Difference Methods. Third edition. Clarendon Press, Oxford Smolarkiewicz PK (1983) A simple positive definite advection scheme with small implicit diffusion. Mon Wea Rev 11 479-486... [Pg.1118]

The rate of change of particle size is also indicated as Gp and can be positive, in the case of growing particles, or negative, in the case of shrinking particles. This is probably the most popular way to indicate the rate of phase-space advection due to mass exchange, perhaps because it is quite easy to measure the change in particle size at different instants, for example by simple imaging techniques. If the internal coordinate is instead particle volume (i.e. = Vp), the definition becomes... [Pg.150]

The definitions of the terms on the right-hand sides depend on the orders of the schemes used for diffusion and advection. For diffusion we have... [Pg.358]

Bott, A., A positive definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear normalization of the advective fluxes. Mon Weath Rev 117, 1006, 1989... [Pg.137]

By this definition, reactive transport models that use an isotherm to describe the partitioning of a contaminant between groundwater and the solid matrix are not coupled models. In these models, only one type of equation, the advective-dispersive-reactive equation, is solved. [Pg.28]

The value of E in relation to like the value of gj, indicates the evaporative nature of the surface so E < E q or E/Ee, < 1 reflects surface dryness or stomatal closure as well as the balance of energy exchange between the atmosphere and the underlying surface. By definition, E > Ef, can be caused only by advection. As implied above with respect to the partitioning of temperature, this may also result from the entrainment of dry air from above the convective boundary layer that develops daily over the earth surface. To further illustrate the relation between E and Ef, in terms of surface characteristics, it is helpful to write the Penman-Monteith equation (Monteith and Unsworth, 1990),... [Pg.157]

In this equation, known as the Darcy Equation, and which is applied in hydrogeology for calculating advective fluxes in groundwater, vjm s ] denotes the velocity with which a particle/solute crosses a definite distance in aqueous sediments. Ap refers to the pressure altitude measured in meters of water column (10 Pa = 1 bar 750 mm Hg 10.2 m water column) and Ax [m] is the distance across which the pressure difference is measured. In the example shown above ((]) = 0.77, k = 7-10 m s ), this distance amounts to 4 m. Insertion into Equation 3.30 yields ... [Pg.114]

An advection of the sediment s solid phase does not, at first sight, seem to make any sense, because it implies - in contrast to bioturbation - a movement of sediment particles which favor a specific direction. There is no known process that describes an advection of a solid phase, instead, the definition of such a process actually only... [Pg.114]


See other pages where Advection: definition is mentioned: [Pg.263]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.1013]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.1352]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.526]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.101 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.82 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.271 ]




SEARCH



Advection

Advective

© 2024 chempedia.info