Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption filler surface

The model in Figure 3.20a applies to ACM-silica, while Figure 3.20b suits the ENR-silica system. Kraus constant, C, determined from the slope of the plots in Figure 3.19, quantifies the mbber-silica interaction in these systems. CACM/siUca is 1-85 and CENR/siika is 2.30 and these values are significantly higher than the reinforcing black-filled mbber composites [65]. Hydrogen-bonded interaction between the SiOH and the vicinal diols in ENR is responsible for this, whereas dipolar interaction between ester and SiOH in ACM-silica only results in weaker adsorption of the mbber over the filler surfaces. [Pg.76]

Prior to the chemical reaction of the silane with the silanol-groups on the sUica surface, the silane molecule has to make contact with the sUica surface by adsorption. Then the chemical reaction of silica with an alkoxy-silyl moiety of the coupling agent takes place in a two-step, endothermic reaction. The primary step is the reaction of alkoxy-groups with silanol-groups on the silica filler surface [4]. Two possible mechanisms are reported ... [Pg.802]

It has been well established that wear resistance of filled rubber is essentially determined by filler loading, filler morphology, and polymer-filler interaction. For fillers having similar morphologies, an increase in polymer-filler interaction, either through enhancement of physical adsorption of polymer chains on the filler surface, or via creation of chemical linkages between filler and polymer, is crucial to the enhancement of wear resistance. In addition, filler dispersion is also essential as it is directly related to the contact area of polymer with filler, hence polymer-filler interaction. [Pg.945]

The performance of stabilisers in respect of their physical persistency can also be improved by physical adsorption on surfaces of reinforcing fillers, e.g. of CB or amorphous microground silica [589]. Mineral fillers are well known to adsorb polymer additives, especially stabilisers necessary for processing and... [Pg.143]

Most elastomers require reinforcing fillers to function effectively, and NMR has been used to characterize the structures of such composites as well. Examples are the adsorption of chains onto filler surfaces [275], the immobilization of these chains into "bound rubber" [276], and the imaging of the filler itself [277]. [Pg.375]

Silica used as a filler for rubbers is silicon dioxide, with particle sizes in the range of 10-40 nm. The silica has a chemically bound water content of 25% with an additional level of 4-6% of adsorbed water. The surface of silica is strongly polar in nature, centring around the hydroxyl groups bound to the surface of the silica particles. In a similar fashion, other chemical groups can be adsorbed onto the filler surface. This adsorption strongly influences silica s behaviour within rubber compounds. The groups found on the surface of silicas are principally siloxanes, silanol and reaction products of the latter with various hydrous oxides. It is possible to modify the surface of the silica to improve its compatibility with a variety of rubbers. [Pg.145]

As Table 2 shows, non-treated fillers and reinforcements have high energy surfaces. During the almost exclusively used melt mixing procedure, the forces discussed in the previous section lead to the adsorption of polymer chains onto the active sites of the filler surface. The adsorption of polymer molecules results in the development of a layer which has properties different from those of the matrix polymer [43-47]. Although the character, thickness and properties of this interlayer or interphase are much discussed topics, its existence is now an accepted fact. [Pg.127]

The thickness of the interphase is a similarly intriguing and contradictory question. It depends on the type and strength of the interaction and values from 10 Ato several microns have been reported in the hterature for the most diverse systems [47,49,52,58-60]. Since interphase thickness is calculated or deduced indirectly from some measured quantities, it depends also on the method of determination. Table 3 presents some data for different particulate filled systems. The data indicate that interphase thicknesses determined from some mechanical properties are usually larger than those deduced from theoretical calculations or from extraction of filled polymers [49,52,59-63]. The data supply further proof for the adsorption of polymer molecules onto the filler surface and for the decreased mobility of the chains. Thermodynamic considerations and extraction experiments yield data which are not influenced by the extent of deformation. In mechanical measurements, however, deformation of the material takes place in all cases. The specimen is deformed even during the determination of modulus. With increasing deformations the role and effect of the immobilized chain ends increase and the determined interphase thickness also increases (see Table 3) [61]. [Pg.128]

H NMR transverse magnetisation relaxation experiments have been used to characterise the interactions between NR, isoprene rubber, BR, EPDM and polyethylacrylate rubbers with hydrophilic silica and silicas modified with coupling agents [124-129]. These studies showed that the physical interactions and the structures of the physical networks in rubbers filled with carbon black and rubbers filled with silicas are very similar. In both cases the principal mechanism behind the formation of the bound rubber is physical adsorption of rubber molecules onto the filler surface. [Pg.378]

In composite systems, 2H NMR is particularly suited to investigate interfacial properties. Indeed, isolated nuclei are observed, which potentially allows spatially selective information to be obtained. It has been used to investigate polymer chain mobility at the polymer-filler interface, mainly in filled silicon (in particular PDMS) networks. The chain mobility differs considerably at the polymer-filler interface, and this may be interpreted in terms of an adsorbed polymer layer at the filler surface. T1 relaxation measurements allowed to determine the fraction of chain units involved in the adsorption layer, or equivalently, the thickness of the layer [75, 76, 77]. The molecular mobility and the thickness of the adsorption layer are very sensitive to the type of filler surface [78]. [Pg.584]

The discussion in the Introduction led to the convincing assumption that the strain-dependent behavior of filled rubbers is due to the break-down of filler networks within the rubber matrix. This conviction will be enhanced in the following sections. However, in contrast to this mechanism, sometimes alternative models have been proposed. Gui et al. theorized that the strain amplitude effect was due to deformation, flow and alignment of the rubber molecules attached to the filler particle [41 ]. Another concept has been developed by Smith [42]. He has indicated that a shell of hard rubber (bound rubber) of definite thickness surrounds the filler and the non-linearity in dynamic mechanical behavior is related to the desorption and reabsorption of the hard absorbed shell around the carbon black. In a similar way, recently Maier and Goritz suggested a Langmuir-type polymer chain adsorption on the filler surface to explain the Payne-effect [43]. [Pg.9]

Summary Solid state NMR studies of molecular motions and network structure in poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) filled with hydrophilic and hydrophobic Aerosil are reviewed and compared with the results provided by other methods. It is shown that two microphases with significantly different local chain mobility are observed in filled PDMS above the glass transition, namely immobilized chain units adsorbed at the filler surface and mobile chain units outside this adsorption layer. The thickness of the adsorption layer is in the range of one to two diameters of the monomer unit ( 1 nm). Chain units in the adsorption layer are not rigidly linked to the surface of Aerosil. The chain motion in the adsorption layer depends significantly on temperature and on type of the filler surface. With increasing temperature, both the fiaction of less mobile adsorbed chain units and the lifetime of the chain units in the adsorbed state decrease. The lifetime of chain units in the adsorbed state approaches zero at approximately 200 K and 500 K for PDMS chains at the surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic Aerosil, respectively. [Pg.779]

The mean average molecular mass of the network chains is determined for the elastomer matrix outside the adsorption layer. Contributions to the network structure fi om different types of junctions (chemical junctions, adsorption junctions, and topological hindrances due to confining of chains in the restricted geometry (entropy constraints or elastomer-filler entanglements) are estimated. The major contributions to the total network density are provided by the topological hindrances near the filler surface and by the adsorption junctions. The apparent number of the elementary chain units between the topological hindrances is estimated to be approximately 40-80 elementary chain units. [Pg.779]

Partial immobilization of elastomer chains as a result of chain adsorption at the adsorption sites on the filler surface... [Pg.781]

This paper is devoted to the study of a part of the complex phenomena of reinforcement, namely the behavior of the host elastomer in the presence of filler particles. The results of solid state NMR experiments and some other methods for filled PDMS are reviewed. The short-range dynamic phenomena that occur near the filler surface are discussed for PDMS samples filled with hydrophilic and hydrophobic Aerosils. This information is used for the characterization of adsorption interactions between siloxane chains and the Aerosil surface. Possible relations between mechanical properties of filled silicon rubbers on the one hand and the network structure and molecular motions at flie PDMS-Aerosil interface on the other hand are discussed as well. [Pg.782]

Thus, the H relaxation experiments and the analysis of the solid-echo spectra show that the adsorption of PDMS chain units on the surface of hydrophilic Aerosil significantly restricts the motion of chain tmits adjacent to the filler surface. However, chain units in the adsorption layer are not rigidly linked to the surface of Aerosil at temperatures well above the Tg. Motions of chain units in the adsorption layer become less restricted as the temperature increases. [Pg.786]

Finally, the NMR and the dynamic mechanical study show that two regions are present in filled silicone rubbers above the Tg, which differ significantly in local chain mobility immobilized chain units adsorbed at the filler surface and mobile chain units outside the adsorption layer. The local chain motions outside the adsorption layer are similar to those for unfilled rubbers. Chain motions in the adsorption layer however are strongly restricted. The frequency of chain motions in the adsorption layer at 300 K is comparable to the fi-equency of chain motions in a crosslinked PDMS containing 3-4 elementary chain units between network junctions [26]. [Pg.792]

The thickness of the adsorption layer was estimated from the fraction of adsorbed chain units measured by means of h Ty, Tj and H relaxation studies [7, 8, 10, 12]. From the known value of the specific surface of Aerosil, its volume fraction in mixtures and the fraction of low mobile chain units at the Aerosil surface, the thickness of the adsorption layer is estimated assuming imiform coverage of the filler particles by a PDMS layer of constant thickness. This calculation leads to a value of about 0.8 run [7]. This value is increased by a factor 1.5-2, if a part of the filler surface will not be accessible for PDMS chains due to direct contacts between the primarily filler particles in aggregates [27]. Thus, the chain adsorption causes a significant restriction of local motions only in one or two monolayers adjacent to the filler surface. A similar estimation of the adsorption layer thickness has been obtained by other methods such as, e.g. dielectric experiment [27], adsorption study [3], the viscosity of the boundary layer for silicon liquids at the surface of a glass [5], molecular dynamics simulations [6], and C NMR relaxation experiments [22]. [Pg.792]

Summarizing this section it can be stated that the adsorption bonds in filled PDMS have a dynamic origin. With increasing temperature, the frequency of adsorption-desorption processes in the adsorption layer increases and the adsorption-desorption equilibrium shifts to the chain desorption. At room temperature, the lifetime for the dimethylsiloxane chain units in the adsorption state is very short chain units adhere to the filler surface only for tens of microseconds. [Pg.794]

Fig. 11. The apparent number of elementary chain units ( ) between network junctions (line) and contribution in it from chemical (a) and adsorption (b) Junctions, and topological hindrances near the filler surface (c) as a function of the volume fraction of Aerosil (300 m g" ) in bound PDMS rubber [14] the apparent number of elementary chain units between transient entanglements is shown by an arrow the absolute error for the determination of the n value is shown by the dashed area... Fig. 11. The apparent number of elementary chain units ( ) between network junctions (line) and contribution in it from chemical (a) and adsorption (b) Junctions, and topological hindrances near the filler surface (c) as a function of the volume fraction of Aerosil (300 m g" ) in bound PDMS rubber [14] the apparent number of elementary chain units between transient entanglements is shown by an arrow the absolute error for the determination of the n value is shown by the dashed area...
It follows from this Fig. that the amount of chemical junctions in silicon rubber increases with increasing fractions of Aerosil. The chemical junctions are apparently formed by scission of PDMS chains under the mechanical forces during milling. However, the fraction of these junctions is the lowest. The fraction of adsorption junctions increases proportionally to the filler content as shown in Fig. 11. The major contribution to the network structure is provided by topological hindrances near the filler surface as shown in Fig. 11. [Pg.798]

It is generally believed that the nature of elastomer-filler interactions is of major importance for marked improvement in mechanical properties of the filled elastomers [39-44]. Adsorption of elastomer chains at the filler surface has a double effect on the enhancement of mechanical properties of filled elastomers. Firstly, the ability of filler particles to share deformation increases due to adsorption interactions between the filler particles and the host matrix. Secondly, these interactions provide significant amount of adsorption and topological junctions in the elastomer matrix outside the adsorption layer. It appears that less mobile chain units in the adsorption layer do not contribute directly to the rubber modulus, since the fiaction of PDMS chain units in this layer is only a few percent of the Aerosil content used in conunercial rubbers [7,8,12,21]. [Pg.802]

Adsorption junctions at the surface of active fillers are of importance due to the large total elastomer-filler interfacial area. The adsorption of chain units at the Aerosil surface causes a significant restriction of local chain motions in the first layer adjacent to the filler surface. The low mobile adsorbed chain units represents another type of network junction in filled elastomers. However, the adsorbed chain units are not rigidly linked to the surface of Aerosil above T. The lifetime of chain imits in the adsorbed state is already very short at room temperature chain units adhere to the filler surface for only tens of microseconds [9], It was shown in Part I that the fraction of adsorbed chain units decreases on heating due to chain desorption. Therefore, the amount of adsorption junctions decreases with the increase of temperature as shown in Fig. 13. [Pg.803]

Progressive detachment of chain Augments adsorbed on the filler surface or their slippage along the filler surface these explanations of stress-softening assume that adsorption junctions are low mobile at the time scale of deformation... [Pg.808]

The service performance of rubber products can be improved by the addition of fine particle size carbon blacks or silicas. The most important effects are improvements in wear resistance of tire treads and in sidewall resistance to tearing and fatigue cracking. This reinforcement varies with the particle size, surface nature, state of agglomeration and amount of the reinforcing agent and the nature of the elastomer. Carbon blacks normally are effective only with hydrocarbon rubbers. It seems likely that the reinforcement phenomenon relies on the physical adsorption of polymer chains on the solid surface and the ability of the elastomer molecules to slip over the filler surface without actual desorption or creation of voids. [Pg.477]

The effect of filler surface preparation on adsorption and bond stability... [Pg.319]


See other pages where Adsorption filler surface is mentioned: [Pg.406]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.950]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.793]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.808]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.354 , Pg.371 , Pg.375 , Pg.376 , Pg.378 ]




SEARCH



Filler surface

© 2024 chempedia.info