Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Additive interference and

Many of the interference effects caused by concomitants are similar in plasma and flame atomic emission. Some techniques, however, may be prone to certain interferences and may exhibit freedom from others. The interference effects are conveniently divided into blank or additive interferences and analyte or multiplicative interferences. [Pg.856]

Note Additional procedural information plus interferences and general remarks will be found in J. A. Dean, ed.. Analytical... [Pg.1165]

Determination of copper as copper(I) thiocyanate Discussion. This is an excellent method, since most thiocyanates of other metals are soluble. Separation may thus be effected from bismuth, cadmium, arsenic, antimony, tin, iron, nickel, cobalt, manganese, and zinc. The addition of 2-3 g of tartaric acid is desirable for the prevention of hydrolysis when bismuth, antimony, or tin is present. Excessive amounts of ammonium salts or of the thiocyanate precipitant should be absent, as should also oxidising agents the solution should only be slightly acidic, since the solubility of the precipitate increases with decreasing pH. Lead, mercury, the precious metals, selenium, and tellurium interfere and contaminate the precipitate. [Pg.455]

Interactions Between Fracturing Fluid Additives and Enzyme Breakers. Despite their advantages over conventional oxidative breakers, enzyme breakers have limitations because of interferences and incompatibilities with other additives. Interactions between enzyme breakers and fracturing fluid additives including biocides, clay stabilizers, and certain types of resin-coated proppants have been reported [1455]. [Pg.262]

More efficient estimation methods exist than the simple method described here [17]. The generalized standard addition method (GSAM) shares the strong points (e.g correction for interferences) and weak points (e.g. error amplification because of the extrapolation involved) of the simple standard addition method [18]. [Pg.368]

Pre-exposure proeessing and preparation of the inner and outer whole-body dosimeters for use in the field should be eonsidered. The analytieal laboratory should determine if the fabric of the dosimeter of choice contains any analytical interference, which may be a problem in subsequent analysis of the fabric. If such analytical interferences are present in the fabric of the dosimeter, they may be reduced by pre-washing the dosimeter material prior to use in the field. The dosimeter is usually pre-washed (sometimes more than once) and rinsed several times prior to thorough drying. The washing detergent of choice should be as free as possible from additive brighteners and other chemicals, which may cause analytical interferences. [Pg.1003]

Some typical applications in SFE of polymer/additive analysis are illustrated below. Hunt et al. [333] found that supercritical extraction of DIOP and Topanol CA from ground PVC increased with temperature up to 90 °C at 45 MPa, then levelled off, presumably as solubility became the limiting factor. The extraction of DOP and DBP plasticisers from PVC by scC02 at 52 MPa increased from 50 to 80 °C, when extraction was almost complete in 25 min [336]. At 70 °C the amount extracted increased from 79 to 95 % for pressures from 22 to 60 MPa. SFE has the potential to shorten extraction times for traces (<20ppm) of additives (DBP and DOP) in flexible PVC formulations with similar or even better extraction efficiencies compared with traditional LSE techniques [384]. Marin et al. [336] have used off-line SFE-GC to determine the detection limits for DBP and DOP in flexible PVC. The method developed was compared with Soxhlet liquid extraction. At such low additive concentrations a maximum efficiency in the extractive process and an adequate separative system are needed to avoid interferences with other components that are present at high concentrations in the PVC formulations, such as DINP. Results obtained... [Pg.96]

The most important area for packed column use involves modified mobile phases (MPs). Consequently, pSFC needs detection systems in which the MP modifier and possible additive(s) do not interfere, and in which detection of low or non-UV-absorbing molecules is possible in combination with pressure/modifier gradients. The disadvantage of adding even small amounts of modifier is that FID can no longer be used as a detector. In the presence of polar modifiers in pSFC the detection systems are restricted basically to spectroscopic detection, namely UVD, LSD, MSD (using PB and TSP interfaces as in LC). ELSD can substitute FID and covers the quasi-universal detection mode, while NPD and ECD cover the specific detection mode in pSFC on a routine basis. As ELSD detects non-UV absorbing molecules dual detection with UV is an attractive option. [Pg.208]

Analyte dilution sacrifices sensitivity. Matrix matching can only be applied for simple matrices, but is clearly not applicable for complex matrices of varying composition. Accurate correction for matrix effect is possible only if the IS is chosen with a mass number as close as possible to that of the analyte elements). Standard addition of a known amount of the element(s) of interest is a safe method for samples of unknown composition and thus unknown matrix effect. Chemical separations avoid spectral interference and allow preconcentration of the analyte elements. Sampling and sample preparation have recently been reviewed [4]. [Pg.589]

If measurements are made in thin oxide films (of thickness less than 5 nm), at highly polished Al, within a small acceptance angle (a < 5°), well-defined additional maxima and minima in excitation (PL) and emission (PL and EL) spectra appear.322 This structure has been explained as a result of interference between monochromatic electromagnetic waves passing directly through the oxide film and EM waves reflected from the Al surface. In a series of papers,318-320 this effect has been explored as a means for precise determination of anodic oxide film thickness (or growth rate), refractive index, porosity, mean range of electron avalanches, transport numbers, etc. [Pg.487]

In some applications, additional components acting as reactors for specific chemical pretreatment are incorporated within the flow manifold. Typical examples are ion-exchange microcolumns for preconcentration of the analyte or removal of interferences and redox reactors, which are used either to convert the analyte into a more suitable oxidation state or to produce online an unstable reagent. Typical examples of online pretreatment are given in Table 2. Apart from these sophisticated reactors, a simple and frequently used reactor is a delay coil (see also Fig. 4), which may be formed by knitting a segment of the transfer line. This coil allows slow CL reactions to proceed extensively and enter into the flow cell at the time required for maximum radiation. The position of the reactors within the manifold is either before or after the injection port depending on the application. [Pg.334]


See other pages where Additive interference and is mentioned: [Pg.2313]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.2313]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.2313]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.2313]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.950]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.271]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.304 ]




SEARCH



Interference additive

Interference and

© 2024 chempedia.info