Accuracy evaluation sections

One of the major objectives of the evaluation section is to provide estimation techniques of the highest accuracy. These estimation techniques may not be appropriate for use in the design procedures. They would thus serve as an additional check to verify the efficacy of any molecules designed. 

Through repetition of the same experiment and subsequent evaluation of the equilibrium data, the accuracy may be increased by averaging the values, if no systematic errors occur. Too high a deviation between equivalent measurements indicates problems in either the data evaluation or the experiment itself. In the latter case, it should be checked if the pumps deliver a constant flow rate and that the temperature is constant in the range of a few tenths of 1 °C. If the eluent consists of a fluid mixture, possible influences of slight changes in eluent composition must be critically evaluated (Section 6.5.7.1). 

The proposed system has three functions (1) accuracy evaluation, (2) accuracy data accumulation, and (3) search and reuse of accuracy data. The objective of the study shown in this section is to build a method for identifying knowledge, knowhow and techniques in the field based on the data managed by the developed system and evaluated by the three dimensional measured data in the ship construction process. The overview of the whole system is shown in Fig. 23.10. All types of data are stored in the database and, as well, the metadata is assigned to the data. Any data stored in the system can be reachable efficiently thanks to the metadata. 

Doppler reactivity is the other important parameter in FBR cores because it assures the intrinsic safety characteristics of the core. The present cross-section adjustment method cannot treat the Doppler reactivity which is dominated by resonance-peak broadening of cross-sections. We have launched a new study to extend the applicability of the cross-section adjustment and design accuracy evaluation system to the Doppler effect. The basic method to evaluate sensitivity of self-shielding factors has been successfully derived from a generalized perturbation theory, and a prototype system to calculate the Doppler sensitivity is now under verification. 

This section first presents literature review on pressure vessel bursts and BLEVEs. Evaluation of energy from BLEVE explosions and pressure vessel bursts is emphasized because this value is the most important parameter in determining blast strength. Next, practical methods for estimating blast strength and duration are presented, followed by a discussion of the accuracy of each method. Example calculations are given in Chapter 9. 

Calculation of thertnochetnical quantities like those we have just considered are a widely-used method for evaluating the accuracy of theoretical methods and models. In this section, we will look at the Gaussian-2 molecule set and then consider how well a variety of model chemistries perform on it. Note that our consideration of the G2 method itself will come later in this chapter. 

A survey of the mathematical models for typical chemical reactors and reactions shows that several hydrodynamic and transfer coefficients (model parameters) must be known to simulate reactor behaviour. These model parameters are listed in Table 5.4-6 (see also Table 5.4-1 in Section 5.4.1). Regions of interfacial surface area for various gas-liquid reactors are shown in Fig. 5.4-15. Many correlations for transfer coefficients have been published in the literature (see the list of books and review papers at the beginning of this section). The coefficients can be evaluated from those correlations within an average accuracy of about 25%. This is usually sufficient for modelling of chemical reactors. Mathematical models of reactors arc often more sensitive to kinetic parameters. Experimental methods and procedures for parameters estimation are discussed in the subsequent section. 

This section describes currently available models and presents important features of each that are pertinent to ET landfill cover design. These models have diverse origins however, each was intended for use in evaluating the hydrologic cycle and included features that are pertinent to landfill covers. The model developer and/or other reviewers have tested each of these models. The purpose of this evaluation is to determine the level of accuracy and usefulness of a model as it might be applied to ET landfill cover design and evaluation. 

The model equations in Section II,A have been formulated to describe the energy and mass transfer processes occurring in two-phase tubular systems. The accuracy of these model equations in representing the physical processes depends on the parameters of the equations being correctly evaluated. Constitutive equations that relate each of the parameters to the physical properties, system properties, and dependent variables of the system are discussed in the following sections. 

The evaluation of the generalized mobility matrix jj.(Q) follows the lines outlined in Section 5.1.1. The elements n1p(Q) can be approximated to high accuracy [100] by sums of a preaveraged term... 

The statistical evaluations of the preceding section indicate that the semiempirical MO methods can predict heats of formation with useful accuracy and at very low computational costs. When comparing with... 

Corrections for instrumentally-produced mass fractionation that preserve natural mass dependent fractionation can be approached in one of two ways a double-spike method, which allows for rigorous calculation of instrumental mass fractionation (e.g., Dodson 1963 Compston and Oversby 1969 Eugster et al. 1969 Gale 1970 Hamelin et al. 1985 Galer 1999 see section Double-spike analysis ), or an empirical adjustment, based on comparison with isotopic analysis of standards (Dixon et al. 1993 Taylor et al. 1992 1993). The empirical approach assumes that standards and samples fractionate to the same degree during isotopic analysis, requiring carefully controlled analysis conditions. Such approaches are commonly used for Pb isotope work. However, it is important to stress that the precision and accuracy of isotope ratios determined on unknown samples may be very difficult to evaluate because each filament load in a TIMS analysis is different. 

Once perspective is gained on the problem, the view is narrowed by framing it in mathematical meastires of performance. The second section of Table 2.3 lists some questions that can be asked. It is important to define the required accuracy and precision of the analysis and insure that everyone appreciates the distinction between these two concepts. Also, if accuracj is going to be evaluated, there must be agreement on a standard of comparison (a rel-erence method). 

---