Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Accidents operators selection

For accident analysis or investigation applications, obviously the accident situation is to be compared to some comparable situation. There are three basic alternatives for this comparable situation. First, it can be the same operation or organization at an earlier point in time. For example, compare the personnel, procedures, plant and hardware, environment, tasks, and other factors at the time of the accident with these same factors as they were one hour (or day or week or year) before the accident. The selection of the comparable point in time depends upon the nature of the operation and the speed at which significant changes occurred. [Pg.213]

The input data to APRIL.MOD3 included the plant geometry and pre-accident operating conditions as well as some parameters concerning the acdd t sequmce. The latter included, in particular, flie decay heat power curve used before in BWRSAR calculations (see Fig. 1) and the prescribed timing of selected events, as shown in Table 1. [Pg.203]

As the previous ehapter discussed nuelear power reactor operation and how to perform a PSA on it, this chapter attempts to apply a similar framework to chemical processing. The problem is the diversity of chemical processing that blurs the focus. This chapter begins by showing that accidents in the chemical process industry cost lives and dollars. Descriptions of deadly chemical accidents arc presented to show the chain of sequences that were involved to suggest how their PSA may be structured. Background on selected hazardous chemical process is presented followed by descriptions of how their PSA have structured. The chapter concludes by applying FTAPSUIT to a pressure vessel rupture analysis. [Pg.245]

One of my tasks was to pass on to design and operating staff details of accidents that had occurred and the lessons that should be learned. This book contains a selection of the reports I collected from many different companies. Although most have been published before, they were scattered among many different publications, some with small circulations. [Pg.425]

Liston, Donald M. "Safety Aspects of Site Selection, Plant Layout, and Unit Plot Planning." In H. H. Fawcett and W. S. Wood (eds.), Safety and Accident Prevention in Chemical Operations, pp. 35-59. New York Wiley, 1982. [Pg.67]

In addition to these selection criteria, the limitations of the author s contacts and the willingness of companies to participate, narrowed the search for a suitable case down to a small Dutch company (< 30 people). This company produces in batches, falls under the Dutch Seveso-II directive (BRZO, 1999) and authorized access to the relevant data. The selected company had experienced some serious accidents recently, in spite of using many technical safety systems. Thus the management was aware of the necessity to enhance both safety and the reliability of the operational process. [Pg.80]

Stage 4, the identification of the initial ineffective control element, can only be identified on the operational control level. Due to limited information (in spite of selecting accidents on the basis of information-richness), hierarchical control levels cannot be identified. [Pg.111]

A preliminary determination of the plant layout enables consideration of pipe runs and pressure drops, access for maintenance and repair and in the event of accidents and spills, and location of the control room and administrative offices. The preliminary plant layout can also help to identify undesirable and unforeseen problems with the preferred site, and may necessitate a revision of the site selection (Section 5.1). The proposed plant layout must be considered early in the design work, and in sufficient detail, to ensure economical construction and efficient operation of the completed plant. The plant layout adopted also affects the safe operation of the plant, and acceptance of the plant (and possibly any subsequent modifications or extensions) by the community. [Pg.64]

This involves considerable art, which must be learned in the clinic. It falls into two divisions (1) surface application to the mucous membranes, especially of the eye, nose, throat, and urethra and (2) injections about nerves, in different parts of their course and distribution, from their spinal roots to their ultimate fibrils. The advantages and disadvantages in comparison with general anesthesia and the selection of the local anesthetic agent also depend on clinical discrimination. Nervous, fearful, and excitable patients often suffer severely from apprehension, which also disposes toward accidents. They may be at least somewhat quieted by sedatives, morphine (0.015 g hypodermically) half an hour before the operation, or by barbiturates. The latter also tend to prevent convulsions. [Pg.262]

Hazard Reviews. Formal and informal hazard reviews are essential to establishing an operational history that is free of accidents. Reviews should be made at key points during the selection, design, construction, start-up and operation of a system. Such reviews are cost-effective because they identify hazards and permit problems to be solved before incorrect and... [Pg.237]

In this step, recombination (crossover) and mutation operators are applied to the individuals selected for reproduction in the previous step. The number of chromosomes, which will be reproduced by crossover operation, as well as, crossover points, can be determined either deterministically by the user or randomly. For example, in case of one-point crossover (see for example in Fig. 11.4) the chromosomes of the parents are cut at some randomly chosen point and the resulting subchromosomes are swapped. As far as the mutation operator is concerned, the user gives the number of genes to be changed per generation. The points to be mutated are chosen either randomly or deterministically according to the accident scenario considered (see for example in Fig. 11.4). [Pg.353]

But the selection of a stopping point and the specific operator action to label as the root cause—and operator actions are almost always selected as root causes—is not the real problem here. The problem is the oversimplification implicit in using a chain of events to understand why this accident occurred. Given the design and operating conditions of the plant, an accident was waiting to happen ... [Pg.25]

One implication is that following an accident, it will be easy to find someone involved in the dynamic flow of events that has violated a formal rule by following established practice rather than specified practice Given the frequent deviation of established practice from normative work instructions and rules, it is not surprising that operator error is found to be the cause of 70 percent to 80 percent of accidents. As noted in the discussion of assumption 2, a root cause is often selected because that event involves a deviation from a standard. [Pg.41]

This activity follows from the identification of major accident hazards (MAHs) and selection of SCEs. The creation of performance standards (PSs) is the process by which an operator sets out what is expected of an SCE. The PSs are the criteria against which the initial and ongoing suitability of an SCE is assessed. SIL assessments may be used to develop PSs for instrument-based protective systems. PSs for SCEs are generally defined in terms of... [Pg.683]


See other pages where Accidents operators selection is mentioned: [Pg.379]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.1115]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.1076]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.1112]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.1109]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.176]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.211 ]




SEARCH



Accident Selection

Operatives selection

© 2024 chempedia.info