Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Absorption, efficiency

It was found that that in the case of soft beta and X-ray radiation the IPs behave as an ideal gas counter with the 100% absorption efficiency if they are exposed in the middle of exposure range ( 10 to 10 photons/ pixel area) and that the relative uncertainty in measured intensity is determined primarily by the quantum fluctuations of the incident radiation (1). The thermal neutron absorption efficiency of the present available Gd doped IP-Neutron Detectors (IP-NDs) was found to be 53% and 69%, depending on the thicknes of the doped phosphor layer ( 85pm and 135 pm respectively). No substantial deviation in the IP response with the spatial variation over the surface of the IP was found, when irradiated by the homogeneous field of X-rays or neutrons and deviations were dominated by the incident radiation statistics (1). [Pg.507]

Thick Csl scintillator input screen 2 mm thick (4mm possible) which enables an absorption efficiency at least five times higher than a standard Image Intensifier. [Pg.594]

The absorption efficiency how much of the available energy is actually absorbed by the adhesive. [Pg.1028]

Grease absorption efficiency The ratir> by weight of the quantity of grease retained by a grease filter to a reference quantity. [Pg.1445]

Absorption Efficiency, or fraction absorbed Overall tray efficiency, fraction Stripping efficiency, or fraction stripped Fraction of v + li absorbed by the liquid Fraction of loi stripped out of the liquid Mols individual components stripped per hour Total heat of absorption of absorbed components, thousand Btu/day... [Pg.121]

Male mice that received trichloroethylene at 240 mg/kg/day by gavage in 10% Emulphor for 2 weeks, or that consumed drinking water containing as much as 5 mg/mL (equivalent to a dosage of approximately 793 mg/kg/day) for 6 months, showed no treatment-related effects other than increased liver weights without accompanying macroscopic lesions (Tucker et al. 1982). This may be indicative of differences in absorption efficiencies of the lipophilic trichloroethylene administered in water versus oil. [Pg.89]

Figure 7.3 Absorption efficiencies for a 50 nm diameter nanoshell with varying aspect ratios. Reproduced from Harris [72], Copyright (2006) American Chemical Society. Figure 7.3 Absorption efficiencies for a 50 nm diameter nanoshell with varying aspect ratios. Reproduced from Harris [72], Copyright (2006) American Chemical Society.
Fig. 10 Urinary excretion of riboflavin (A, B) and ascorbic acid (C, D) in humans as a function of oral dose. Graphs A and C illustrate the nonlinear dependence of absorption on dose, which is suggestive of a saturable specialized absorption process. Graphs B and D represent an alternative graph of the same data and illustrate the reduced absorption efficiency as the dose increases. (Graphs A and C based on data in Ref. 39 and graphs B and D based on data in Ref. 40.)... Fig. 10 Urinary excretion of riboflavin (A, B) and ascorbic acid (C, D) in humans as a function of oral dose. Graphs A and C illustrate the nonlinear dependence of absorption on dose, which is suggestive of a saturable specialized absorption process. Graphs B and D represent an alternative graph of the same data and illustrate the reduced absorption efficiency as the dose increases. (Graphs A and C based on data in Ref. 39 and graphs B and D based on data in Ref. 40.)...
The absorption efficiency term allows estimation of the effective dose or the amount of pollutant which crosses the membrane of the exposed tissue (e.g., the lung) and reaches a target organ (e.g., the liver). For many pollutants this type of metabolic data is not available and consequently 100% absorption is a common preliminary assumption in exposure assessments. For well-studied substances such as radionuclides, a methodology for calculation of target organ doses has been developed for bone marrow, lungs, endosteal cells, stomach wall, lower intestine wall, thyroid, liver, kidney, testes and ovaries as well as for the total body. [Pg.293]

The O Flaherty Model simulates the age-dependence of lead kinetics on such factors as absorption efficiency, excretion efficiency, uptake into bone and loss from bone, and partitioning between plasma and red blood cells. The model does not incorporate age, dose rate, or time dependence of lead accumulation in every organ (e g., kidney) because the complex patterns of lead accumulation in certain tissues are not known (O Flaherty 1991a) (see Section 2.4.1). However, the basic model structure allows for additional modules to be incorporated, depending on its intended use in risk assessment. For example, additional modules that are currently being developed are a pregnancy model and a model of net bone loss in older women and men. [Pg.243]

The absorption efficiency of the different carotenoids is variable. For example, (3-cryptoxanthin has been reported to have higher absorption efficiency than a-cryptoxanthin in rats (Breithaupt and others 2007). Carotenoids must be liberated from the food before they can be absorbed by intestinal cells (Faulks and Southon 2005). Mechanical disruption of the food by mastication, ingestion, and mixing leads to carotenoid liberation (Guyton and Hall 2001). The enzymatic and acid-mediated hydrolysis of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins (chemical breaking of the food) also contributes to carotenoids liberation from the food matrix (Faulks and Southon 2005). Once released, carotenoids must be dissolved in oil droplets, which are emulsified with the aqueous components of the chyme. When these oil droplets are mixed with bile in the small intestine, their size is reduced, facilitating the hydrolytic processing of lipids by the pancreatic enzymes (Pasquier and others 1996 Furr and Clark 1997 ... [Pg.200]

Breithaupt DE, Yahia EM and Valdez F. 2007. Comparison of the absorption efficiency of a- and 3-cryptoxanthin in female Wistar rats. Br J Nutr 97 329—336. [Pg.212]

The resulting AEGL-3 values are shown in Table 3-11. Conversion of animal exposure data to human equivalent concentrations based upon minute volume and body weight relationships was not appropriate. Such a conversion predicted that monkeys and dogs would be more sensitive than rodents, a contention that is not supported by the animal data. Furthermore, the conversion to human equivalent concentrations assumes 100% absorption of inhaled monomethylhydrazine such absorption efficiency has not been verified. [Pg.155]

The bioavailability of selenium to a benthic deposit-feeding bivalve, Macoma balthica from particulate and dissolved phases was determined from AE data. The selenium concentration in the animals collected from San Francisco Bay was very close to that predicted by a model based on the laboratory AE studies of radiolabelled selenium from both particulate and solute sources. Uptake was found to be largely derived from particulate material [93]. The selenium occurs as selenite in the dissolved phase, and is taken up linearly with concentration. However, the particle-associated selenium as organoselenium and even elemental selenium is accumulated at much higher levels. The efficiency of uptake from the sediment of particulate radiolabelled selenium was 22%. This contrasts with an absorption efficiency of ca. 86% of organoselenium when this was fed as diatoms - the major food source of the clam. The experiments demonstrated the importance of particles in the uptake of pollutants and their transfer through the food web to molluscs, but the mode of assimilation was not discussed. [Pg.384]


See other pages where Absorption, efficiency is mentioned: [Pg.596]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.1035]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.769]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.773]    [Pg.789]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.1370]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.526]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.118 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.326 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.231 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.118 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 , Pg.168 , Pg.169 , Pg.170 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.121 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.309 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.469 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.198 , Pg.205 , Pg.209 , Pg.245 ]




SEARCH



Absorption and stripping efficiency

Absorption co-efficient

Absorption columns plate efficiency

Absorption efficiency Adhesion

Absorption efficiency defined

Absorption efficiency dependence

Absorption efficiency factor

Absorption efficiency greater than

Absorption efficiency packing HETP

Absorption efficiency prediction, trays

Absorption efficiency, exposed

Absorption stage efficiency

Absorption tray efficiency

Detector characteristics absorption efficiency

Distillation and Absorption Tray Efficiencies

Efficiencies for absorption

Efficiency factors for absorption

Energy efficiency, physical absorption

Gold nanoparticles absorption efficiency

Heating Efficiency by Energy Absorption

High Efficiency Absorption

Nitric Acid High Efficiency Absorption

Nutrient absorption efficiency improvement

Sulfur absorption efficiency

Water droplets absorption efficiency

© 2024 chempedia.info