Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Why Study Classification

Sampling studies can be classified Into two types - enumeratlve, or descriptive, and analytic (j ). The classification Is Important because the applicable statistical methods and approaches are different for these two types. The objective of either type of study Is to provide a basis for action. In an enumeratlve study the action Is directed to the population from which the samples were taken. How or why the population was formed Is not of primary Interest. In an analytic study, the primary Interest Is the causal system or process which created the conditions observed In the study. Action taken Is directed toward this process rather than the population sampled. [Pg.79]

For example, for the iron oxide dust considered in the previous case study, Table 2 suggested Vfmm = 18 to 20 m s1 (i.e., assuming an average industrial dust ) On analysis of the sample, it was found dp50 80 pm, which appeared to support this classification. However, upon further examination of the actual distribution of size, a significant proportion of the material was found > 1000 pm (e.g., large flakes). A minimum conveying velocity of at least Vjmm 25 m s 1 was estimated for this dust. This explains why the iron oxide material built up and eventually blocked branch II-IV, which was sized/balanced mainly for air distribution purposes and produced transport velocities < Vfi r... [Pg.758]

This Section presents basic definitions and concepts necessary to undertake a detailed discussion of waste classification (more detailed technical background is provided in Section 3). It also describes the scope of this Report to indicate why further discussion of a number of issues that are important to waste classification is not required because they are outside the scope of this study. [Pg.57]

Why is it important to recognise the problems posed by molecular diversity within functionally related sites The answer is simple. Diversity in sites offers the key to specific drug design. Decades of experience from studies of drug-receptor interaction have shown that modifications to the structure of small ligands can reveal a wealth of receptor subtypes empirical classification systems for receptors evolved before sequence data became... [Pg.10]

Fourcroy was keenly aware, then, of the limitations of the princi-palist approach to composition embedded in the phlogiston theory. Not only did he point out the mismatch between the supposed presence of phlogiston and the manifested properties of the bodies containing it he also explicitly criticized the Stahlian hierarchy of composition as a mere imagination. Instead, he wished to introduce a classification of chemical experience based on affinities. In other words, he sought to work out the affinity approach to composition in chemical systematics. This is why he later fought to preserve the doctrine of elective affinities in opposition to Berthollet. Although historians have interpreted Fourcroy s work as a contribution to the study of composition, his works should be placed within the framework of affinity chemistry which called for a new order of chemical composition and systematics. [Pg.356]

Use WWW-NIMBUS and solve the nutrition problem (saved in the system for guest users). Use both the symbolic and graphical classification in WWW-NIMBUS. Which one do you prefer Why For some classification, use both local and global (underlying) optimizer. Study the similarity of the results obtained and analyze the reasons for the similarity. [Pg.188]

Much of this handbook is concerned with the how and why of crystallization and crystallizer design. This chapter will focus on the crystallization of one particular class of chemical compounds, namely the proteins. In the timeline of crystallization, protein crystallization is a newcomer. The first mention of protein crystal formation, roughly 150 years ago, involved crystallizing hemoglobin from the blood of various species (Lehman 1853 Reichert and Brown 1909 Debru 1983 McPherson 1991). This work was followed by the crystallization of a variety of proteins from plants to egg white (Sumner 1926). These early studies were pivotal in establishing that enzymes are proteins (Dounce and Allen 1988). The use of protein crystallization in purification and classification of biological chemicals resulted in the Nobel Prize for Chemistry being awarded to Sumner, Nothrop, and Stanley in 1946. [Pg.267]

The complexity of oncogenic process, involving somatic multiple mutations coupled with variability in the host s genetic constitution, produces a disease of enormous complexity. That is why Nevins et al. believe that 100 breast cancer patients may represent 100 distinct diseases [47]. The concept of each tumor as an individual was documented during the classification of breast carcinomas, because repeated samplings of the same tumor, either before and after chemotherapy or as a tumor-metastasis pair, were found to have much more similarity to each other than to any other tumor studied [49]. Furthermore, different foci in an individual may have distinct profiles and clonally related tumors in the same individual can show different expression patterns owing to divergent histories [50]. [Pg.657]

There is another problem connected to the classification of data. Such classification will result in a loss of information about the detailed circumstances of the accident. These details are often essential to our understanding of why the actual accident happened, especially when we study complex human behaviour. Fortunately, the problems with biases and with loss of information run in parallel. The losses and the incident at the right side of the ILCI model of Figure 15.4, for example, are usually adequately represented by coded data. The level of details in the precursory events and conditions and in the causal factors on the left side of the model is often too high to allow for a meaningful coding. We here face a situation where rich information has to be forced into too small a frame. The person responsible for coding will then make a more or less arbitrary selection. It follows that statistical summaries of accident causes too often represent... [Pg.208]


See other pages where Why Study Classification is mentioned: [Pg.63]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.276]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info