Humans behaviour

This is a rather simplified view of the cause and effect of human behaviour on the safety standards of organisations. The full picture is somewhat more complex, and the next section discusses human behaviour in terms of what it is, how it can affect safety in the workplace and how knowledge of how humans behave at work can be used to improve safety standards. 

In attempting to understand how individuals may behave in the workplace, it is important to consider what is termed human factors . An understanding of human factors will enable organisations to understand and manage the effects that humans have upon risk control systems. 

The safety of the employees will always depend, to a greater or lesser degree, on their own skill and ability to work safely , based on their training, knowledge and experience. Under normal conditions, the competence of individuals makes an essential contribution to workplace 

The acceptance of safety issues by people at work, and therefore their contribution to them, depends on the importance placed on safety by the organisation and all of the people within it. 

A number of factors affect and impact upon human behaviour in the workplace. The most important of these factors relate to the organisation in which the individual works, the job being done and the person undertaking the work. 

---

The determination and analysis of sensory properties plays an important role in the development of new consumer products. Particularly in the food industry sensory analysis has become an indispensable tool in research, development, marketing and quality control. The discipline of sensory analysis covers a wide spectrum of subjects physiology of sensory perception, psychology of human behaviour, flavour chemistry, physics of emulsion break-up and flavour release, testing methodology, consumer research, statistical data analysis. Not all of these aspects are of direct interest for the chemometrician. In this chapter we will cover a few topics in the analysis of sensory data. General introductory books are e.g. Refs. [1-3]. 

However, economists do try to cope with and interpret some of these factors affecting human behaviour. Some of this work is done on the concept of donations. 

John Dupre Or you d explain human behaviour in terms of the interactions of brain cells. The opposite, downward causation, would be, for example, to say that the behaviour of a person causes their brain cells to move in a certain way. Lisa s example today, I take to be, as she just summarised it, precisely a claim to downward causation. That is to say that the social phenomena actually act causally on the individual, and, of course, to deny what is a very common thesis in the philosophy of social phenomena, which is methodological individualism, which says, and many people, social scientists and philosophers have said - you have to be able to explain social phenomena by looking at the behaviour of individuals. And that s the reductionist view as opposed to the downward causation view, which is an anti-reductionist view. And I think that s certainly one of the standard ways philosophers have understood the debate. 

I shall not say much today about the third premise listed above, that brains cause behaviour. My own opinion is that this is in some ways the most philosophically confused of the three. Very briefly, I think it is confused because it treats our understanding of human behaviour with an internalist, mechanistic model that is ultimately continuous with our understanding of the behaviour of planets, trees and beetles. However, or so I believe, in understanding humans we are interested in the reasons for actions rather than, as this parallel assumes, the causes of bodily motion. In addition, the proper individuation of actions requires the resources of language and meaning which, finally, depend not on the properties of the individual... 

Dupre, J. (1998), Against reductive explanations of human behaviour, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 72 (Supplementary), 153-171. 

Levels of Explanation in Human Behaviour the Poverty of Evolutionary Psychology1... 

Because archaeologists study the past, they are unable to observe human behaviour directly. Unlike historians, they also lack access to verbally encoded records of the past. Instead they must attempt to infer human behaviour and beliefs from the surviving remains of what people made and used before they can begin, like other social scientists, to explain phenomena. ... 

The claim that archaeology is a science is clearly not universally held. Many archaeologists suggest that the study of human behaviour in the past is restricted by science, with its apparent rigidity of scientific method and dubious claims of certainty, and must continue to reside with the humanities. Undoubtedly, archaeology is one of the few disciplines which straddles the gulf between the humanities and the sciences. 

Dunbar, R.I.M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioural Brain Sciences 16 681—735. 

In the history of both animal and human ethology the direct observation of unstaged interactions in a natural habitat plays a critical role for methodological and theoretical considerations. Even when ethologists think that they already know much about adaptations and the ways in which they interact with the environment, the principles which have been involved in the evolution of increasingly complex human behaviour are still not very well understood. 

A major reason for this lies in methodological problems connected with the observation and description and the nature of human behaviour itself. In order to asses causation and function of behaviour we rely on an observational device. The process of information reduction which is applied to the study of behaviour results in highly variable observations. The assessment of meaning and function rarely produces reproducible results, and different signals especially in human communication seem to take many meanings which are context-specific. Partially this might be due to the observational approaches used for coding behaviour. 

---