Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Viscosity coefficients temperature dependence

The mass transfer can be influenced by convection, while surface integration cannot. Surface integration is affected by the impurity content. Both effects depend on the temperature level since physical properties such as diffusion coefficient and viscosity are temperature dependent. [Pg.164]

By contrast, the hqnid-phase Schmidt unmbers range from about 10" to lO and depeua strongly on the temperature. The effect of temperature on the liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient is related primarily to changes in the hquid viscosity with temperature, and this derives primarily from the strong dependency of the hqnid-phase Schmidt number upon viscosity. [Pg.1358]

Following the general trend of looldng for a molecular description of the properties of matter, self-diffusion in liquids has become a key quantity for interpretation and modeling of transport in liquids [5]. Self-diffusion coefficients can be combined with other data, such as viscosities, electrical conductivities, densities, etc., in order to evaluate and improve solvodynamic models such as the Stokes-Einstein type [6-9]. From temperature-dependent measurements, activation energies can be calculated by the Arrhenius or the Vogel-Tamman-Fulcher equation (VTF), in order to evaluate models that treat the diffusion process similarly to diffusion in the solid state with jump or hole models [1, 2, 7]. [Pg.164]

The temperature dependence of a diffusion-controlled rate constant is very small. Actually, it is just the temperature coefficient of the diffusion coefficient, as we see from the von Smoluchowski equation. Typically, Ea for diffusion is about 8-14 kJ mol"1 (2-4 kcal mol-1) in solvents of ordinary viscosity. [Pg.201]

While electrical conductivity, diffusion coefficients, and shear viscosity are determined by weak perturbations of the fundamental diffu-sional motions, thermal conductivity is dominated by the vibrational motions of ions. Heat can be transmitted through material substances without any bulk flow or long-range diffusion occurring, simply by the exchange of momentum via collisions of particles. It is for this reason that in liquids in which the rate constants for viscous flow and electrical conductivity are highly temperature dependent, the thermal conductivity remains essentially the same at lower as at much higher temperatures and more fluid conditions. [Pg.121]

Bercovici D, Lin J (1996) A gravity current model of cooling mantle plume heads with temperature dependent buoyancy and viscosity. J Geophys Res 101 3291-3309 Blundy J, Wood B (1994) Prediction of crystal-melt partition coefficients from elastic moduh. Nature 372 452-454... [Pg.245]

Using Eq. (2.6.18) the temperature dependence of various transport properties of polymers, such as diffusion coefficient D, ionic conductivity a and fluidity (reciprocal viscosity) 1/rj are described, since all these quantities are proportional to p. Except for fluidity, the proportionality constant (pre-exponential factor) also depends, however, on temperature,... [Pg.141]

With turbulent flow, the major temperature drop occurs across the thin layer of gas at the tube wall. The coefficient h depends on the viscosity 17, the thermal conductivity... [Pg.136]

Fig. 4.35 Right-hand side Monomeric friction coefficients derived from the viscosity measurements on PB [205]. The open and solid symbols denote results obtained from different molecular weights. Solid line is the result of a power-law fit. Dashed line is the Vogel-Fulcher parametrization following [205]. Left hand side Temperature dependence of the non-ergodicity parameter. The three symbols display results from three different independent experimental runs. Solid line is the result of a fit with (Eq. 4.37) (Reprinted with permission from [204]. Copyright 1990 The American Physical Society)... Fig. 4.35 Right-hand side Monomeric friction coefficients derived from the viscosity measurements on PB [205]. The open and solid symbols denote results obtained from different molecular weights. Solid line is the result of a power-law fit. Dashed line is the Vogel-Fulcher parametrization following [205]. Left hand side Temperature dependence of the non-ergodicity parameter. The three symbols display results from three different independent experimental runs. Solid line is the result of a fit with (Eq. 4.37) (Reprinted with permission from [204]. Copyright 1990 The American Physical Society)...
In Fig. 1, various elements involved with the development of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms are illustrated. Generally, the objective of this effort is to predict macroscopic phenomena, e.g., species concentration profiles and heat release in a chemical reactor, from the knowledge of fundamental chemical and physical parameters, together with a mathematical model of the process. Some of the fundamental chemical parameters of interest are the thermochemistry of species, i.e., standard state heats of formation (A//f(To)), and absolute entropies (S(Tq)), and temperature-dependent specific heats (Cp(7)), and the rate parameter constants A, n, and E, for the associated elementary reactions (see Eq. (1)). As noted above, evaluated compilations exist for the determination of these parameters. Fundamental physical parameters of interest may be the Lennard-Jones parameters (e/ic, c), dipole moments (fi), polarizabilities (a), and rotational relaxation numbers (z ,) that are necessary for the calculation of transport parameters such as the viscosity (fx) and the thermal conductivity (k) of the mixture and species diffusion coefficients (Dij). These data, together with their associated uncertainties, are then used in modeling the macroscopic behavior of the chemically reacting system. The model is then subjected to sensitivity analysis to identify its elements that are most important in influencing predictions. [Pg.99]

From this information the absolute molecular weight distribution and the intrinsic viscosity-molecular weight plot can be constructed. From this plot the solvent and temperature dependent Mark-Houwink coefficients for linear polymers and information for polymer chain-branching of non-linear polymers can be obtained. [Pg.285]

Recall that the diffusion coefficient of a molecule will decrease with increasing viscosity of the solvent. Thus, the rate of encounter complex formation will decrease in a viscous medium. Since viscosity is itself temperature dependent, such encounters in solution will have their own activation energy. [Pg.138]

Here the pre-exponential factor At is the product of a temperature-dependent constant (ksT/h) = 2 X 10 °Ts where ke and h are the Boltzmann and Planck constants, and a solvent-specific coefficient that relates to both the solvent viscosity and to its orientational relaxation rate. This coefficient may be near unity for very mobile solvent molecules but may be considerably less than unity for viscous or orientationally hindered highly stractured solvents. The exponential factor involves the activation Gibbs energy that describes the height of the barrier to the formation of the activated complex from the reactants. It also describes temperature and pressure dependencies of the reaction rate. It is assumed that the activated complex is in equilibrium with the reactants, but that its change to form the products is rapid and independent of its environment in the solution (de Sainte Claire et al., 1997). [Pg.82]

EXAMPLE 2.6 Temperature Dependence of Diffusion Coefficients. Suppose the diffusion coefficient of a material is measured in an experiment (subscript ex) at some temperature Tex at which the viscosity of the solvent is qgx. Show how to correct the value of D to some standard (subscript s) conditions at which the viscosity is j s. Take 20°C as the standard condition and evaluate D°20 for a solute that displays a D° value of 4.76-10 11 m2 s 1 in water at 40°C. The viscosity of water at 20 and 40°C is 1.0050-10 2 and 0.6560 -10 2 P, respectively. [Pg.93]

Up to now, only hydrodynamic repulsion effects (Chap. 8, Sect. 2.5) have caused the diffusion coefficient to be position-dependent. Of course, the diffusion coefficient is dependent on viscosity and temperature [Stokes—Einstein relationship, eqn. (38)] but viscosity and temperature are constant during the duration of most experiments. There have been several studies which have shown that the drift mobility of solvated electrons in alkanes is not constant. On the contrary, as the electric field increases, the solvated electron drift velocity either increases super-linearly (for cases where the mobility is small, < 10 4 m2 V-1 s-1) or sub-linearly (for cases where the mobility is larger than 10 3 m2 V 1 s 1) as shown in Fig. 28. Consequently, the mobility of the solvated electron either increases or decreases, respectively, as the electric field is increased [341— 348]. [Pg.160]

To expedite the evaluation of transport properties, one could fit the temperature dependent parts of the pure species viscosities, thermal conductivities, and pairs of binary diffusion coefficients. Then, rather than using the complex expressions for the properties, only comparatively simpler polynomials would be evaluated. The fitting procedure must be carried out for the particular system of gases that is present in a given problem. Therefore the fitting cannot be done once and for all but must be done once at the beginning of each new problem. [Pg.518]

Evaluate the viscosity of ethane using these Lennard-Jones parameters over the temperature range 300 to 700 K. Fit the temperature dependence of the viscosity using Eq. 12.114, and report the values of the polynomial fitting coefficients that you obtained. [Pg.535]

Figure 17.2 shows SiFLj and SiH2 species profiles for three different surface temperatures. In all cases there is a boundary layer near the surface, which is about 0.75 cm thick. The boundary becomes a bit thicker at the higher temperatures, owing to the temperature-dependent increases in viscosity, thermal conductivity, and diffusion coefficients. The temperature and velocity boundary layers (not illustrated) are approximately the same thickness as the species boundary layers. [Pg.694]

Fig. 6. The temperature dependence of the friction coefficient of the poly( acrylamide) gels. The total concentrations of acrylamide are 1.24 M (8.8% mass fraction), and 693 mM (5% mass fraction), respectively. Open symbols are used for the results obtained in the cooling process and closed symbols represent the results taken upon increasing the temperature. In the upper part of this figure, the temperature dependence of the ratio f(T)/rj T) is shown. The values of the viscosity are taken from a table. Symbols are the same as those used in the raw value of the friction coefficient... Fig. 6. The temperature dependence of the friction coefficient of the poly( acrylamide) gels. The total concentrations of acrylamide are 1.24 M (8.8% mass fraction), and 693 mM (5% mass fraction), respectively. Open symbols are used for the results obtained in the cooling process and closed symbols represent the results taken upon increasing the temperature. In the upper part of this figure, the temperature dependence of the ratio f(T)/rj T) is shown. The values of the viscosity are taken from a table. Symbols are the same as those used in the raw value of the friction coefficient...
Here, both the viscosity of water and the correlation length of the gel are a function of the temperature. Therefore, in order to discuss the temperature dependence of the correlation length of the gel, it is convenient to use the ratio f(T) /r (T) rather than the raw value of the friction coefficient f(T) since the ratio directly represents the effective size of the pores and their distribution. [Pg.37]

The temperature dependence of the friction coefficient of poly(acrylamide) gels are analyzed according to the above equation. In our analysis, the values of the viscosity of water is taken from the table. The results thus obtained are also shown in Fig. 6. It can be seen from this figure that the friction of the poly(acrylamide) gel normalized with the viscosity of water is independent of the temperature. It indicates that the pore size of the poly(acrylamide) gel is stable in the temperature range studied. [Pg.37]

The temperature dependence of the friction coefficient normalized by the viscosity of the water, f/rj, is given in Fig. 10. The solid symbols are used in the increasing of the temperature and the open symbols are used in the lowering of the temperature. The values of the viscosity of the water, tj(T), are taken from the literature. For the chemically cross-linked gels, such as the poly(acrylamide) gel, the friction, f/rj, is independent of the temperature which has been already shown in previous section. It is, however, found from this figure that the friction... [Pg.43]


See other pages where Viscosity coefficients temperature dependence is mentioned: [Pg.424]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.810]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.415 ]




SEARCH



Coefficients) temperature dependence

Temperature coefficient

Temperature dependence viscosity

Viscosity temperature-dependent

Viscosity, temperature dependency

Viscosity-temperature coefficient

© 2024 chempedia.info