Coefficients temperature dependence

Fig. 19 Hamiltonian, definition of magnetoelectric coefficients a, and theoretical calculations of the magnetoelectric coefficients temperature dependences (simplified model) [37]...

The dcy/dP data and the theoretically derived TOEC were used for calculations of thermal expansion coefficients, temperature dependence of the volume compressibility and the pressure variation of lattice constants, and the agreement with experiment was quite good. For more detail about these calculations see Ramji Rao and Ramanand (1980, 1984) and references given in tables 15 and 16. 

To use Equation (10b), we require virial coefficients which depend on temperature. As discussed in Appendix A, these coefficients are calculated using the correlation of Hayden and O Connell (1975). The required input parameters are, for each component critical temperature T, critical pressure P, ... 

Individual contributions to the second virial coefficient are calculated from temperature-dependent correlations ... 

CALCULATE THE TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT SECOND VIRIAL COEFFICIENTS. 

TAUS CALCULATES TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT INTERACTION COEFFICIENTS TAU FOf 4 USE IN SUBROUTINE GAMMA. IF SYSTEM DATA ARE MISSING (SOME REQUIRED 4 ENTRY IN MATRIX U IN COMMON/BINARY IS ZERO) CORRESPONDING TAU IS 4 SET TO 1 AND lER IS RETURNEO AS +/- 1. FOR NONCONDENSABLES PRESENT 4 IER IS -2 OR -I (OTHERWISE 0). 

It is not necessary to limit the model to idealized sites Everett [5] has extended the treatment by incorporating surface activity coefficients as corrections to N and N2. The adsorption enthalpy can be calculated from the temperature dependence of the adsorption isotherm [6]. If the solution is taken to be ideal, then... 

Ciary D C, Smith D and Adams N G 1985 Temperature dependence of rate coefficients for reactions of ions with dipolar molecules Chem. Phys. Lett. 119 320-6... 

Figure B2.5.7 shows the absorption traces of the methyl radical absorption as a fiinction of tune. At the time resolution considered, the appearance of CFt is practically instantaneous. Subsequently, CFl disappears by recombination (equation B2.5.28). At temperatures below 1500 K, the equilibrium concentration of CFt is negligible compared witli (left-hand trace) the recombination is complete. At temperatures above 1500 K (right-hand trace) the equilibrium concentration of CFt is appreciable, and thus the teclmique allows the detennination of botli the equilibrium constant and the recombination rate [54, M]. This experiment resolved a famous controversy on the temperature dependence of the recombination rate of methyl radicals. Wliile standard RRKM theories [, ] predicted an increase of the high-pressure recombination rate coefficient /r (7) by a factor of 10-30 between 300 K and 1400 K, the statistical-adiabatic-chaunel model predicts a...

The saturation magnetization, J), is the (maximum) magnetic moment per unit of volume. It is easily derived from the spia configuration of the sublattices eight ionic moments and, hence, 40 ]1 per unit cell, which corresponds to = 668 mT at 0 K. This was the first experimental evidence for the Gorter model (66). The temperature dependence of J) (Fig. 7) is remarkable the — T curve is much less rounded than the usual BdUouia function (4). This results ia a relatively low J) value at RT (Table 2) and a relatively high (—0.2%/° C) temperature coefficient of J). By means of Mitssbauer spectroscopy, the temperature dependence of the separate sublattice contributions has been determined (68). It appears that the 12k sublattice is responsible for the unusual temperature dependence of the overall J). 

The exchange energy coefficient M characterizes the energy associated with the (anti)paraHel coupling of the ionic moments. It is direcdy proportional to the Curie temperature T (70). Experimental values have been derived from domain-width observations (69). Also the temperature dependence has been determined. It appears thatM is rather stable up to about 300°C. Because the Curie temperatures and the unit cell dimensions are rather similar, about the same values forM may be expected for BaM and SrM. 

The rate of heat-transfer q through the jacket or cod heat-transfer areaM is estimated from log mean temperature difference AT by = UAAT The overall heat-transfer coefficient U depends on thermal conductivity of metal, fouling factors, and heat-transfer coefficients on service and process sides. The process side heat-transfer coefficient depends on the mixing system design (17) and can be calculated from the correlations for turbines in Figure 35a. 

Other Properties. The glass-transition temperature for PPO is 190 K and varies htde with molecular weight (182). The temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient of PPO in the undiluted state has been measured (182). 

The temperature dependence of the permeability arises from the temperature dependencies of the diffusion coefficient and the solubility coefficient. Equations 13 and 14 express these dependencies where and are constants, is the activation energy for diffusion, and is the heat of solution... 

The temperature dependence of the open circuit voltage has been accurately determined (22) from heat capacity measurements (23). The temperature coefficients are given in Table 2. The accuracy of these temperature coefficients does not depend on the accuracy of the open circuit voltages at 25°C shown in Table 1. Using the data in Tables 1 and 2, the open circuit voltage can be calculated from 0 to 60°C at concentrations of sulfuric acid from 0.1 to 13.877 m. 

Equation (4-187) is the virial equation in pressure, and B, C, D, . . . , are the pressure-series virial coefficients. Like the density-series coefficients, they depend on temperature and composition only. Moreover, the two sets of coefficients are related ... 

Hayduk-Laudie They presented a simple correlation for the infinite dilution diffusion coefficients of nonelectrolytes in water. It has about the same accuracy as the Wilke-Chang equation (about 5.9 percent). There is no explicit temperature dependence, but the 1.14 exponent on I compensates for the absence of T in the numerator. That exponent was misprinted (as 1.4) in the original article and has been reproduced elsewhere erroneously. 

---