Vapor separation

There is a report on the Carbon Membrane Separator for elimination of SFg from gas insirlated electrical utilities [7]. In the electrical power industry 80% of 6,500-7,500 metric t SFg produced worldwide is used as a gaseous dielectric in circuit breakers, gas-irrsulated substatiorrs and switchgear. Besides its high price, SFg is a very potent greenhoitse gas. A possible way to captirre and reuse the SFg in the 

Ismail et al.. Carbon-based Membranes for Separation Processes, 

---

When a mixture in a reactor effluent contains components with a wide range of volatilities, then a partial condensation from the vapor phase or a partial vaporization from the liquid phase followed by a simple phase split often can produce a good separation. If the vapor from such a phase split is difficult to condense, then further separation needs to be carried out in a vapor separation unit such as a membrane. 

Both hollow-fiber and spiral-wound modules are used ia gas-separation appHcations. Spiral-wound modules are favored if the gas stream contains oil mist or entrained Hquids as ia vapor separation from air or natural gas separations. 

Whereas Hquid separation method selection is clearly biased toward simple distillation, no such dominant method exists for gas separation. Several methods can often compete favorably. Moreover, the appropriateness of a given method depends to a large extent on specific process requirements, such as the quantity and extent of the desired separation. The situation contrasts markedly with Hquid mixtures in which the appHcabiHty of the predominant distiHation-based separation methods is relatively insensitive to scale or purity requirements. The lack of convenient problem representation techniques is another complication. Many of the gas—vapor separation methods ate kinetically controUed and do not lend themselves to graphical-phase equiHbrium representations. In addition, many of these methods require the use of some type of mass separation agent and performance varies widely depending on the particular MSA chosen. 

The special case involving the removal of a low (2—3 mol %) mole fraction impurity at high (>99 mol%) recovery is called purification separation. Purification separation typically results in one product of very high purity. It may or may not be desirable to recover the impurity in the other product. The separation methods appHcable to purification separation include equiUbrium adsorption, molecular sieve adsorption, chemical absorption, and catalytic conversion. Physical absorption is not included in this Hst as this method typically caimot achieve extremely high purities. Table 8 presents a Hst of the gas—vapor separation methods with their corresponding characteristic properties. The considerations for gas—vapor methods are as follows (26—44). 

Table 8. Characteristic Properties for Gas-Vapor Separation Methods...

Concentration polarization is a significant problem only in vapor separation. There, because the partial pressure of the penetrant is normally low and its solubihty in the membrane is high, there can be depletion in the gas phase at the membrane. In other applications it is usually safe to assume bulk gas concentration right up to the membrane. 

Fluidized-bed catalytic cracking units (FCCUs) are the most common catalytic cracking units. In the fluidized-bed process, oil and oil vapor preheated to 500 to SOOT is contacted with hot catalyst at about 1,300°F either in the reactor itself or in the feed line (called the riser) to the reactor. The catalyst is in a fine, granular form which, when mixed with the vapor, has many of the properties of a fluid. The fluidized catalyst and the reacted hydrocarbon vapor separate mechanically in the reactor and any oil remaining on the catalyst is removed by steam stripping. 

Lahiere, R. J., et al. Membrane Vapor Separation Recovery of Vinyl Chloride Monrtmer From PVC Reactor Vents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32 (1993), pp. 2236-2241. 

Figure 4-16. Diagram of action of wire mesh in liquid-vapor separation. Courtesy of Metal Textile Corp., Bulletin ME 9-58.

If the design of Figure 4-41 is used for liquid-vapor separation at moderately high liquid loads, the liquid sliding down the walls in sheets and ripples has somewhat of a tendency to be torn off from the rotating liquid and become re-entrained in the upward gas mov ement. 

The horizontal natural circulation systems do not use a kettle design exchanger, but rather a 1-2 (1 shell side, 2 tube-side passes) unit, with the vaporized liquid plus liquid not vaporized circulating back to a distillation column bottoms vapor space or, for example, to a separate drum where the vapor separates and flows back to the process system and where liquid recirculates back along with make-up feed to the inlet of the horizontal shell and tube reboiler. See Figures 10-96A-C. 

The vacuum extraction process involves using vapor extraction wells alone or in combination with air injection wells. Vacuum blowers are used to create the movement of air through the soil. The air flow strips the VOCs from the soil and carries them to the surface. Figure 18.14 shows the flow diagram for such a process. During extraction, water may also be extracted along with vapor. The mixture should be sent to a liquid-vapor separator. The separation process results in both liquid and vapor residuals that require further treatment. Carbon adsorption is used to treat the vapor and water streams, leaving clean water and air for release, and spent GAC for reuse or disposal. Air emissions from the system are typically controlled by adsorption of the volatiles onto activated carbon, by thermal destruction, or by condensation. 

Mitsubishi has patented a triphenylphosphine oxide-modified rhodium catalyst for the hydroformylation of higher alkenes with both alkyl branches and internal bonds. [19] Reaction conditions are 50-300 kg/cm2 of CO/H2 and 100-150 degrees C. The high CO/H2 partial pressures provide stabilization for rhodium in the reactor, but rhodium stability in the vaporizer separation system is a different matter. Mitsubishi adds triphenylphosphine to stabilize rhodium in the vaporizer. After separation, triphenylphosphine is converted to its oxide before the catalyst is returned to the reactor. 

Next, we need to calculate the amount of each component in the vapor phase. At room temperature, the vapor separates into a condensate that is mostly water and a gas phase that is mostly CO2. Table 23.2 provides the composition of each. The mole number of each component (H2O, CO2, and H2S) in the condensate, expressed per kg H2O in the liquid, is derived by multiplying the concentration (g kg-1) by the vapor fraction Xvap and dividing by the component s mole weight. 

Zeolite/polymer mixed-matrix membranes prepared from crosslinked polymers and surface-modified zeolite particles offered both outstanding separation properties and swelling resistance for some gas and vapor separations such as purification of natural gas. Hillock and coworkers reported that crosslinked mixed-matrix membranes prepared from modified SSZ-13 zeolite and 1,3-propane diol crosslinked polyimide (6FDA-DAM-DABA) synthesized from 2,2 -feis-(3,4-dicarboxyphenyl)hexafluoropropane dianhydride, p-dimethylaminobenzylamine-and 3,5-diaminobenzoic acid displayed high CO2/CH4 selectivities of up to 47 Barrer and CO2 permeabilities of up to 89 Barrer under mixed gas testing conditions [71]. Additionally, these crosslinked mixed-matrix membranes were resistant to CO2 plasticization up to 450 psia (3100kPa). 

The device resembles a cylindrical differential mobility analyzer (DMA) in that a sample flow is introduced around the periphery of the annulus between two concentric cylinders, and charged particles migrate inward towards the inner cylinder in the presence of a radial electric field. Instead of being transmitted to an outlet flow, the sample is collected onto a Nichrome filament located on the inner cylinder. The primary benefit of this mode of size-resolved sampling, as opposed to aerodynamic separation into a vacuum, is that chemical ionization of the vapor molecules is feasible. Because there is no outlet aerosol flow, the collection efficiency is determined by desorption of the particles from the filament, chemical ionization of the vapor, separation in a mobility drift cell, and continuous measurement of the current produced when the ions impinge on a Faraday plate. 

Figure 1 Flowsheet of the RCH/RP hydroformylation process 38 1 Continuous flow stirred tank reactor,424 2 Phase separator, 3 Stripping column, 4 Distillation column, 5 Heat exchanger, 6 Falling film evaporator, 7 Liquid vapor separator.

Fig. 4. Flow diagram of the Ruhrchemie/Rhone-Poulenc process (137) 1, continuous-flow, stirred tank reactor 2, phase separator 3, stripping column 4, distillation column 5, heat exchanger 6, falling film evaporator 7, liquid-vapor separator.

Liquid-vapor separators designed by this method can be smaller than those sized via conventional means. This partly results from a fuller consideration of the mechanisms of vapor- and liquid-phase separations. 

---