Vacuum Quantum Mechanics

Positronium can pick-off an electron during a collision with a pore wall and annihilate into two photons. Between collisions, only three photon annihilations occur, just as in vacuum. Quantum mechanically, the overlap with the wall-electron wave functions decreases with the distance from the wall and pick-off (two photons) becomes less likely. With increasing pore size collisions become less frequent. The ratio of 3 photon annihilations to 2 photons probes the combination of pore size and total pore volume as well as their link to the sample surface, and can be measured by examining the energy distribution of annihilation photons. This 3-to-2 photon ratio can be calibrated to absolute fractions of positronium in the annihilation spectrum [16, 17]. 

Consequently one of the key experimental observations of electrochemical promotion obtains a firm theoretical quantum mechanical confirmation The binding energy of electron acceptors (such as O) decreases (increases) with increasing (decreasing) work function in a linear fashion and this is primarily due to repulsive (attractive) dipole-dipole interactions between O and coadsorbed negative (positive) ionically bonded species. These interactions are primarily through the vacuum and to a lesser extent through the metal . 

Equation (6.20) and the semiquantitative trends it conveys, can be rationalized not only on the basis of lateral coadsorbate interactions (section 4.5.9.2) and rigorous quantum mechanical calculations on clusters89 (which have shown that 80% of the repulsive O2 - O interaction is indeed an electrostatic (Stark) through-the-vacuum interaction) but also by considering the band structure of a transition metal (Fig. 6.14) and the changes induced by varying O (or EF) on the chemisorption of a molecule such as CO which exhibits both electron acceptor and electron donor characteristics. This example has been adapted from some rigorous recent quantum mechanical calculations of Koper and van Santen.98... 

All of these one- and two-body models have assumed hard walls for the box (potential V = 00 for r > R). The actual potential energy difference between the lower edge of the conduction band of the macrocrystal and the vacuum level amounts to 3.8 eV. This potential dqpth was used in the quantum mechanical calculation of curve b. It is seen that the energy lowering is substantial, particularly at small diameters. 

PALS is based on the injection of positrons into investigated sample and measurement of their lifetimes before annihilation with the electrons in the sample. After entering the sample, positron thermalizes in very short time, approx. 10"12 s, and in process of diffusion it can either directly annihilate with an electron in the sample or form positronium (para-positronium, p-Ps or orto-positronium, o-Ps, with vacuum lifetimes of 125 ps and 142 ns, respectively) if available space permits. In the porous materials, such as zeolites or their gel precursors, ort/zo-positronium can be localized in the pore and have interactions with the electrons on the pore surface leading to annihilation in two gamma rays in pick-off process, with the lifetime which depends on the pore size. In the simple quantum mechanical model of spherical holes, developed by Tao and Eldrup [18,19], these pick-off lifetimes, up to approx. 10 ns, can be connected with the hole size by the relation ... 

An atomic unit of length used in quantum mechanical calculations of electronic wavefunctions. It is symbolized by o and is equivalent to the Bohr radius, the radius of the smallest orbit of the least energetic electron in a Bohr hydrogen atom. The bohr is equal to where a is the fine-structure constant, n is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, and is the Rydberg constant. The parameter a includes h, as well as the electron s rest mass and elementary charge, and the permittivity of a vacuum. One bohr equals 5.29177249 x 10 meter (or, about 0.529 angstroms). 

Field emission is a tunneling phenomenon in solids and is quantitatively explained by quantum mechanics. Also, field emission is often used as an auxiliary technique in STM experiments (see Part II). Furthermore, field-emission spectroscopy, as a vacuum-tunneling spectroscopy method (Plummer et al., 1975a), provides information about the electronic states of the tunneling tip. Details will be discussed in Chapter 4. For an understanding of the field-emission phenomenon, the article of Good and Muller (1956) in Handhuch der Physik is still useful. The following is a simplified analysis of the field-emission phenomenon based on a semiclassical method, or the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation (see Landau and Lifshitz, 1977). 

The potential curve for the electrons near the tip surface is shown in Fig. 1.38. The relevant dimensions are much smaller than the radius of the tip end. Therefore, a one-dimensional model is adequate. In the metal, the energy level of the electrons is lower than the vacuum level by the value of the work function c ). From the point of view of classical mechanics, the electrons cannot escape from the metal even with a very high external field, that is, the potential barrier is impenetrable. From the point of view of quantum mechanics, there is always a finite probability that the electrons can penetrate the potential barrier. In the semiclassical (WKB) approximation, the transmission coefficient for a general potential barrier is (Landau and Lifshitz, 1977) ... 

The derivation of the transmission coefficients for a square barrier can be found in almost every textbook on elementary quantum mechanics (for example, Landau and Lifshitz 1977). However, the conventions and notations are not consistent. Figure 2.5 specifies the notations used in this book. To make it consistent with the perturbation approach later in this chapter, we take the reference point of energy at the vacuum level. 

The potential is treated as usual [6] as an operator subject to the commutator relation of quantum mechanics. This procedure gives the positive definite Hamiltonian (521) and vacuum energy (524) self-consistently. The scalar potential , is Fourier expanded as... 

In a model in which a random phase approximation would be valid, all pv would vanish. It is therefore appropriate to consider pv as expressing the correlations in the system while p0 refers to the vacuum of correlations, We shall illustrate the theory with the example of an atom in interaction with a radiation field. (For more details, see Henin.12) Then the quantum-mechanical version of Eq. (7) is ... 

It was found earlier that a sudden frequency change during an electronic Franck-Condon transition leads to special quantum mechanical statistics, called squeezing [2-9], of the molecular vibrations [10-12], A state is termed squeezed if some of its characteristics have less noise than the corresponding quantum noise of the vacuum state. The concept of squeezing turned out to be very fruitful in basic research and implies a lot of promising practical possibilities. 

From Table V one sees that we are obtaining a transfer coefficient of about 0.2 0.5, which is much lower than the experimental value of 0.6 as described above. The calculated transfer coefficient is probably low due to the fact that in this classical simulation, the vacuum region between the infinitely thin surface charge and the first water layer contains a significant fraction of the net potential drop across the cell. (See Fig. 12. The data in Fig. 12 are from Ref. 46, but similar results were obtained for the cuprous-cupric simulation.) In contrast, in results from the calculations described in the previous section and in Ref. 36 for the electrode electronic structure, the quantum mechanically treated electrons on the electrode have a finite spatial extent and lower the field at the interface. On the other hand, since the barrier in this simulation is not very sensitive to the net potential drop, the result for the barrier height is not as sensitive as the transfer coefficient to this problem. 

The derivation of Eq. (218) from Eq. (206) follows from local gauge invariance, and it is always possible to apply a local gauge transform to the vector A, the Maxwell vector potential. The ordinary derivative of the d Alembert wave equation is replaced by an 0(3) covariant derivative. The U(l) equivalent of Eq. (218) in quantum-mechanical (operator) form is Eq. (13), and Eq. (212) is the rigorously correct form of the phenomenological Eq. (25). It can be seen that Eq. (212) is richly structured in the vacuum and must be solved numerically. The vacuum currents present in Eq. (218) can be computed from the right-hand side of the wave equation (212), and these vacuum currents follow from local gauge invariance. 

---