Calculation of the Transference Coefficient

The Physical Chemistry of Materials Energy and Environmental Applications 

Where there is no transport control, it is possible to suppose that in the transition from An+ to A 1, an intermediary species (IS) is formed. This species has the property to share an electron during time, x, with the electrode surface. It is then possible to describe the quantum state of the shared electron as follows [127] 

We can now suppose that if the rate of transformation of the IS into A is slow compared to the rate of formation of the IS from An+, then the Nernst equation can be applied to obtain [127] 

The electrode potential, c , is an overpotential generated by the electrode reaction therefore, according to the notation followed here, it is possible to identify c with r. Consequently, substituting Equations 8.65 and 8.66 in Equation 8.67 and making c() = r, we get 

If we now suppose [127] that the system of electrons forming bonds with the electrode surface fulfills the Gibbs canonical ensemble [5], subsequently 

---

These expressions are recommended for calculation of the transfer coefficients between the outside surface of the catalyst and the flowing fluid. 

For ideal gases the effective binary diffusion coefficient can be calculated from molecular properties (see Appendix A). The film thickness, 5, is determined by hydrodynamics. Correlations are given in the literature which allow the calculation of the transfer coefficient in the case of equimolar counterdiffusion, kf, rather than the film thickness, 5 ... 

Some typical compilations of experimental data are shown in Figs. 7.39 and 7.40 for heat and mass transfer, respectively. These data indicate that for low values of the Reynolds number, the Sherwood or Nusselt number tends to fall below the limiting value of 2 established for single particles or for packed-bed systems [viz. Eqs. (7.3.18), (7.3.23), etc.]. It was suggested by Kunii and Levenspiel [47] that this apparent anomaly may be resolved by considering that even in these systems some fraction of the gas passed through in the form of bubbles. Thus an incorrect driving force has been used in the calculation of the transfer coefficients. 

Liquid viscosity is one of the most difficult properties to calculate with accuracy, yet it has an important role in the calculation of heat transfer coefficients and pressure drop. No single method is satisfactory for all temperature and viscosity ranges. We will distinguish three cases for pure hydrocarbons and petroleum fractions ... 

At the conceptual stage for heat exchanger network synthesis, the calculation of heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops should depend as little as possible on the detailed geometry. However, some assumptions must be made regarding the geometry. 

At the conceptual stage for heat exchanger network synthesis, the calculation of heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop should depend as little as possible on the detailed geometry. Simple models will be developed in which heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop are both related to velocity1. It is thus possible to derive a correlation between the heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop and the surface area by using velocity as a bridge between the two1. 

The calculation of the transmission coefficient for adiabatic electron transfer modeled by the classical Hamiltonian Hajis based on a similar procedure developed for simulations of general chemical reactions in solution. The basic idea is to start the dynamic trajectory from an equilibrium ensemble constrained to the transition state. By following each trajectory until its fate is determined (reactive or nonreactive), it is possible to determine k. A large number of trajectories are needed to sample the ensemble and to provide an accurate value of k. More details... 

The first evidence that two step proton transfer from a hydrogen-bonded acid could occur consisted of Eigen plots for proton removal by buffer bases. The demonstration of a change in the rate-limiting step as in (30) and (31) provides even more clear evidence and permits the calculation of the rate coefficients and equilibrium constant for opening of the hydrogen bond. 

In most types of mass-transfer equipment, the interfacial area, a, that is effective for mass transfer cannot be determined accurately. For this reason, it is customary to report experimentally observed rates of transfer in terms of mass-transfer coefficients based on a unit volume of the apparatus, rather than on a unit of interfacial area. Calculation of the overall coefficients from the individual volumetric coefficients is made practically, for example, by means of the equations ... 

Experimental attempts to verify the dependence of the transfer coefficient on the electrode potential have been made with simple outer sphere redox electrode reactions (see refs. 5—19 in ref. 70a). Corrections to experimental values of the apparent transfer coefficient due to double layer effects are performed by the use of eqn. (109), but the value of a calculated from experimental data depends on the assumptions about the location of the centre of charge in the transition state in the Helmholtz layer [70b]. 

When the heterogeneous electron transfer (ET) between the electrode and the molecule in solution is slow, dramatic changes may be exhibited in the CV diagnostic criteria. Modest decreases in kf and kb (a quasireversible system) cause a modest increase in AEp, the change of which with v may be used to calculate ks, the standard heterogeneous ET rate (ks = kf = kb at E = E° ). As the ET rates become smaller, the waves are more likely to reflect the influence of the transfer coefficient, a, on the wave shape. The forward and reverse branches are shaped as mirror images only if a = 0.5. If a < 0.5, the cathodic branch is broader the converse is true if a > 0.5 (Fig. 23.7). 

The most time consuming parts of the forward model are the calculation of the absorption coefficients and the calculation of the radiative transfer. A spectral resolution of Av = 0.0005 cm 1 is considered necessary in order to resolve the shape of Doppler-broadened lines. To avoid repeated line-shape and radiative transfer calculations at this high resolution, two optimizations have been implemented ... 

The surface tension is important for the calculation of mass transfer coefficients and the specific contact area (see Section 9.4.4). Depending on the availability of necessary parameters, the surface tension for a molecular species can be determined either with the simplest method of Hakim-Steinberg-Stiel or with a more complex DIPPR-method (see Ref. [52]). The mixture surface tension can be obtained via a mixing rule. A further extension to cover electrolyte mixtures is realized by the method of Onsager and Samaras (see Ref. [44]). The latter uses an additive term which can be estimated using the dielectric constant of the mixture and molar volumes of electrolytes. 

Extensive data on liquid metals are given in Ref. 13, and the heat-transfer characteristics are summarized in Ref. 23. Lubarsky and Kaufman [14] recommended the following relation for calculation of heat-transfer coefficients in fully developed turbulent flow of liquid metals in smooth tubes with uniform heat flux at the wall ... 

Bromley [8] suggests the following relation for calculation of heat-transfer coefficients in the stable film-boiling region on a horizontal tube ... 

Since the velocity profile in bubble columns is known, the procedure for the calculation of heat transfer coefficient can be developed on a more rational basis. Substitution of Equation (4) in (1) gives ... 

The equations (3.262) and (3.263) can also be used for the calculation of mass transfer coefficients. As has already been explained, this merely requires the replacement of the Nusselt with the Sherwood number and the Prandtl with the Schmidt number. 

Whilst heat transfer in convection can be described by physical quantities such as viscosity, density, thermal conductivity, thermal expansion coefficients and by geometric quantities, in boiling processes additional important variables are those linked with the phase change. These include the enthalpy of vaporization, the boiling point, the density of the vapour and the interfacial tension. In addition to these, the microstructure and the material of the heating surface also play a role. Due to the multiplicity of variables, it is much more difficult to find equations for the calculation of heat transfer coefficients than in other heat transfer problems. An explicit theory is still a long way off because the physical phenomena are too complex and have not been sufficiently researched. 

---