Using control chart for

Using Control Charts for Quality Assurance Control charts play an important role in a performance-based program of quality assurance because they provide an easily interpreted picture of the statistical state of an analytical system. Quality assessment samples such as blanks, standards, and spike recoveries can be monitored with property control charts. A precision control chart can be used to monitor duplicate samples. 

The chemist understands that advisory acceptance limits stated in the SAP do not reflect the actual accuracy of analysis. The laboratory has determined the accuracy by using control charts for LCS data. The QC check sample data that are within these statistical limits indicate that the analytical process is in control. The chemist accepts the laboratory accuracy criteria and does not qualify the sample results, although the SAP acceptance criteria for LCS/LCSD have been exceeded. 

To develop an attribute control chart, a subgrouping strategy must first be determined. The subgroup size (n) is the number of units tested for classification data, or the area of opportunity for the incidence to occur for count data. There are four commonly used control charts for attribute data, depending on the type of attribute data and the constancy of the subgroup size. Table 1 summarizes these charts. 

P Charts. One of the most commonly used control charts for attributes is the percent defective or P chart. P charts are prepared by obtaining a series of... 

The focus of this chapter is on the two principal components of a quality assurance program quality control and quality assessment. In addition, considerable attention is given to the use of control charts for routinely monitoring the quality of analytical data. 

Example of the use of subrange precision control charts for samples that span a range of analyte concentrations. The precision control charts are used for... 

The use of several QA/QC methods is described in this article, including control charts for monitoring the concentration of solutions of thiosulfate that have been prepared and stored with and without proper preservation the use of method blanks and standard samples to determine the presence of determinate error and to establish single-operator characteristics and the use of spiked samples and recoveries to identify the presence of determinate errors associated with collecting and analyzing samples. 

The conventional control chart is a graph having a time axis (abscissa) consisting of a simple raster, such as that provided by graph or ruled stationary paper, and a measurement axis (ordinate) scaled to provide six to eight standard deviations centered on the process mean. Overall standard deviations are used that include the variability of the process and the analytical uncertainty. (See Fig. 1.8.) Two limits are incorporated the outer set of limits corresponds to the process specifications and the inner one to warning or action levels for in-house use. Control charts are plotted for two types of data ... 

Maintain the logbook for the instrument used in this experiment. Record the date, your name(s), the experiment name or number, the correlation coefficient, and the results for the control sample. Also plot the control sample results on a control chart for this experiment posted in the laboratory. 

Create the standard curves (one for caffeine and one for benzoate) by plotting peak size vs. concentration. Use the spreadsheet procedure in Experiment 18. Obtain the concentrations of the unknowns and the control. Plot the results for the control sample on the control chart for this instrument posted in the laboratory. 

There are broadly two uses of chemometrics that interest the process chemist. The first of these is simply data display. It is a truism that the human eye is the best analytical tool, and by displaying multivariate data in a way that can be easily assimilated by eye a number of diagnostic assessments can be made of the state of health of a process, or of reasons for its failure [ 153], a process known as MSPC [154—156]. The key concept in MSPC is the acknowledgement that variability in process quality can arise not just by variation in single process parameters such as temperature, but by subtle combinations of process parameters. This source of product variability would be missed by simple control charts for the individual process parameters. This is also the concept behind the use of experimental design during process development in order to identify such variability in the minimum number of experiments. 

You could decide to use control charts and to analyse certified reference materials (see chapter 13 and 14). Control charts are a simple, but effective tool for internal quality control. Internal quality control is one of a number of concerted measures that analytical chemists can take to ensure that the data produced in the laboratory are fit for their intended purpose. ... 

We are starting with the case where we have a control sample that covers the whole analytical process inclnding all sample preparation steps. The matrix of the control sample is similar to that of the routine samples. Then the standard deviation of the analysis of this sample (under between-batch conditions) can be used directly as an estimate for the reproducibility within the laboratory. The standard deviation can be taken directly from a control chart for this control sample (see chapterl3). In the table two examples are shown for different concentration levels. 

Figure 12 (A) x-control chart for drug D specific gravity using moving range method.

Control charts similar to the hand-drawn ones used earlier to illustrate the evaluation of processing data are also easily prepared using readily available software. Figure 16 is an x chart of tablet assay for active ingredient 2. Note that minimum maximum specification limits have been included. Figure 17 depicts a traditional x control chart for dissolution to which error bars have been added to denote individual tablet assays for each batch. 

In this chapter, several types of control charts for the analysis of historical data are discussed. Explanations of the use of x and R charts, for both two or more measurements per batch and only one measurement per batch, are give, along with explanations of modified control charts and cusum charts. Starting with a brief exposition on the calculation of simple statistics, the construction and graphic analysis of x and R charts are demonstrated. The concepts of under control and out of control, as well as their relationship to test specifications, are included. The chapter concludes with consideration of the question of robustness of x and R charts. 

When specifications are set for individual testing results, it is misleading and meaningless to plot them on x charts. However, when specifications are set for the sample average x, or when individual specifications and control charts for one measurement per batch are used, it is advantageous to include them on the x chart. In fact, whether under control or not, a process can either meet the specifications or not. Below are the four possible actions to be taken in each of the four situations. 

Construct a control chart for the reactor from Example 1.14. Use this chart to determine whether the reactor is under statistical control for the following averages of five measurements of yield taken at hourly intervals ... 

Develop a metrics system allowing for quantifiable results wherever possible for example, use statistical process control charts for manufacturing processes and correlating manufacturing deviations with consumer complaint trends. 

The relative power of DMG (Table 1), established by experiments at low temperature and short reaction times and thus crudely representative of kinetic control conditions, may vary with inter- and intramolecular competition, conditions, and sometimes results are conflicting. Nevertheless, for synthetic practice this hierarchy follows a qualitative order consistent with CIPE and serves as a useful predictive chart. For thermodynamic control conditions, the pchart of Fraser of 12 DMG [27], determined by equilibrium deprotonation using LiTMP (pka=37.8), is a guide for lithium dialkylamide DoM reactions. 

Comparison of the y values in Table 5.4 to these limits reveals no out of control means, that is, no evidence in the means of assignable process variation. Figures 5.12 and 5.13 show control charts for all of y, R, and s, where control limits for the last two quantities have been derived using standard calculations not shown here. 

Calibration of balances calibration of ultraviolet grating for wavelength accuracy exchange of lamps system suitability testing analysis of quality control samples and evaluation of results using control charts. 

Control charts often have a center line and two control lines with two pairs of limits a warning line at m 2s and an action line at m 3s. Statistics predict that 95.45% and 99.7% of the data will fall within the areas enclosed by the 2s and 3s limits. The center line is either the mean or the true value. In the ideal case, where unbiased methods are being used, the center line would be the true value. This would apply, for example, to precision control charts for standard solutions. 

The use of Bartlett s Test thus leads to the same conclusion as the control chart for ranges. It requires more calculation, but on the other hand has the advantages of being more sensitive and precise. 

Some measure of dispersion of the subgroup data should also be plotted, as a parallel control chart. For small groups of data the range may be used as a measure... 

---