Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Unit levels

A We absorb all costs at the business unit level, that is, the divisions. However, corporate is setting the agenda for this work. Each division has been asked to include the costs of integration into its current planning cycle. Where this impacts short-term planned performance, we will adjust the plans. However, from the next planning cycle onward the plans will include these costs—and the benefits of the new system. There vmII be one exception to this the conceptual plan and pilot project will be developed and funded by corporate. [Pg.46]

Augmented-Unit level. (START. UP. DEPROPANIZER), (START. [Pg.51]

The scheduling models for each refinery convert the preceding information into detailed unit-level directives that provide day-by-day operating conditions or set points. [Pg.554]

Paul and Paul35 made a study of the effect of various levels of vitamin A intake, particularly on the eye and tooth development of albino rats. They found that 10 times the supposed minimum gave the best response of any of the levels tested. At this level (20 units per 100 gm. body weight daily) 18 of the 19 animals were "normal," both as to teeth and eyes, but one animal was listed as slightly abnormal as to teeth, and one definitely so with respect to eyes. At 1/5 of this level (4 units per 100 gm.) 20 per cent were normal as to teeth and 60 per cent were normal as to eyes. At 1/10 of the top level (2 units per 100 gm.) 26 per cent were normal as to eyes but none were normal as to teeth. It is apparent from these data that the 20 unit level was not sufficient for some of the rats, but that the 4 unit level was sufficient for about 20 per cent. This indicates a greater than 5-fold spread even among these relatively homogeneous albino rats. [Pg.190]

On the business unit level, regardless of the type of business, chemical companies should focus on capital productivity as the key value driver of ROIC besides margins. [Pg.39]

Successful specialty chemicals companies can still reap rich rewards and create value in the future, by concentrating on two key factors for success they have to develop strategies which allow them to shape leading positions in markets or arenas that fit their competitive advantages, and achieve superior operational performance at the business unit level. In this chapter we map out the key strategic levers that specialty players can pull to achieve this, and assess what is needed to fulfill them. [Pg.95]

In order to survive in the spedalties environment, companies need to act quickly. However, given the high diversity of the specialty chemicals business there is no one right answer. Each player has to find its own way to create value at the business unit level against the backdrop of its business portfolio and the dynamics of the segments served, as well as its own strengths and competences. [Pg.102]

Specialty companies are facing an ever tougher environment. Eventually, the extent to which a company will manage to outperform other players, be they existing players, financial investors or new low-cost entrants, will depend on its ability to develop a strategy which will enable it to shape a leading competitive position in a market or arena that can allow it to tap into its advantages, and to achieve superior operational performance at the business unit level. [Pg.108]

In particular, they will have to develop strategies which will enable them to shape a leading competitive position in markets or arenas where they can tap into their advantages, and to achieve superior operational performance at the business unit level. [Pg.108]

The operating unit (level three) takes information available on a daily basis and makes hour-by-hour changes to meet those goals, on the average, over the course of the day. The unit operation level involves individual equipment, and desired setpoints may be changed on an hourly (or more frequent) basis. Regulation on this level occurs on the order of minutes. [Pg.142]

This result further confirms that the dynamics at the unit level are strongly influenced by the flow rates of the large internal material streams u), while the flow rates of the small process input and output streams, uf, have little impact on the fast dynamics. [Pg.41]

Moreover, the fact that, at the unit level, the presence of flow rates of vastly different magnitudes is modeled as a regular perturbation, while at the process... [Pg.41]

The interactions between units do, however, become significant over long periods of time processes with recycle exhibit a slow, core dynamic component that must be addressed in any effective process-wide control strategy. This chapter presented an approach for systematically exploiting this two-time-scale behavior in a well-coordinated hierarchical controller design. The proposed framework relies on the use of simple distributed controllers to address unit-level control objectives in the fast time scale and a multivariable supervisory controller to accomplish process-wide control objectives over an extended time horizon. [Pg.63]

Control objectives related to the operation of the process units and the process itself (production rate, product quality, unit-level, and total inventory) should be addressed in the fast time scale. For instance, when a multi-loop linear control strategy is considered, the reset time for the controllers should be of the order of magnitude of the time constants of the individual process units. [Pg.84]

Figure 5.8 Three distinct time horizons in the dynamic response of the reactor-condenser process core. Top fast, unit-level dynamics. Middle the total holdup of component A has an intermediate response time. Bottom the total holdup of impurity evolves in the slowest time scale. The plots depict simulation results with initial conditions slightly perturbed from their steady-state values. Figure 5.8 Three distinct time horizons in the dynamic response of the reactor-condenser process core. Top fast, unit-level dynamics. Middle the total holdup of component A has an intermediate response time. Bottom the total holdup of impurity evolves in the slowest time scale. The plots depict simulation results with initial conditions slightly perturbed from their steady-state values.
The presence of three distinct time horizons in the process dynamics, as evinced by the analysis above, warrants the use of a hierarchical control structure that addresses the distributed (unit-level) and plant-wide control objectives separately. [Pg.122]

Meanwhile, one should note that in chemistry, the process of establishing a "nomenclature" has, in addition to its analogy to the dictionary, a geometrical counterpart in terms of dimension. As well as the formulation, at the systems level, of topologically different models to be used for allocating moieties into distinct taxonomy classes [62], a corresponding development at the unit level is herewith included. [Pg.18]

Determine which toxic unit levels need testing for both the individual mixture components and the mixtures. [Pg.135]

The procedure to set up such an experimental design is as follows. Once the EC50s of the individual toxicants are established, the chemical concentrations can be expressed in terms of these EC50 as toxic units (c / EC50). Choose the toxic unit levels that need to be tested, for instance, 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 toxic units. Choose the ratios to be tested, for instance, 1 0, 213 1/3, l/2 l/2, 1/3 213, 0 1. Calculate the... [Pg.135]

NEXAFS. The near-edge profiles, both for Pt L/// and Sn K, show no distinctive features for any of the reference substances or the various catalysts preparations. However, the steep increases in absorption appear at different locations, and the initial maxima rise to characteristic amplitudes. These may be compared when the patterns are normalized to unit level, established by extrapolating the EXAFS background to E q. The corresponding absorptions have been assigned to... [Pg.334]

All dominant variables are controlled at the unit level with manipulated variables local to the reactor. [Pg.128]

Some dominant variables are controlled at the unit level. [Pg.128]


See other pages where Unit levels is mentioned: [Pg.80]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.128]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.197 , Pg.213 , Pg.217 , Pg.220 , Pg.277 , Pg.310 ]




SEARCH



Chemical engineering unit operation level

Criteria for Acceptable Air-Handling Unit and HVAC System Noise Levels

Emission levels United Kingdom

Exhaust units protection level

Fast dynamics at the unit level

Flowsheet Level Units and Connectivities

Interventions unit-level

Levelized unit energy costs

Literature unit-level models

Patient Safety Culture unit level

Polymer retention levels—units

Scores unit level

Unit-level models

United States indoor radon levels

United States setting tolerance levels

Wafer-Level 3D Unit Processes

© 2024 chempedia.info