Unit-level models

Arandes et al. [37] and Han et al. [38] summarize the key submodels required for a unit-level model that can provide necessary simulation fidelity for this work. We briefly summarize these submodels in Table 4.3, and refer readers to these two papers for detailed equations and additional references. 

Modem FCC units and catalyst have very high conversions in the riser section. The conversion of feed species to product species completes within the riser, so we require no additional sections for feed conversion. There are units where feed conversion may occur in locations other than the riser [39,40], but we have chosen to limit our discussion to the most common type of unit 

---

We can divide the literature on FCC modeling into two categories kinetic and unit-level models. Kinetic models focus on chemical reactions taking place within the riser or reactor section of the FCC unit, and attempt to quantify the feed as a mixture of chemical entities to describe the rate of reaction from one chemical entity to another. In contrast, unit-level models contain several submodels to take into account the integrated nature of modem FCC units. A basic unit-level model contains submodels for the riser/reactor, regenerator and catalyst transfer sections. 

The regenerator contains another kinetic model to describe the process of coke removal from the catalyst The unit-level model also captures the heat balance between the riser and the regenerator. 

They consist of two types of models kinetic models and unit-level models. Kinetic analysis refers to detailed studies of the reaction mechanism and catalyst behavior. 

This work typically results in rate expressions that are verified using bench-scale reactors. The unit-level models focus on models that integrate the kinetic model in the context of pilot-scale or commercial reactors. This work often includes models for multiple reactor beds and associated process equipment (interstage heaters, etc.). We provide brief survey of the current state of knowledge in each of these areas. 

Table 5.5 summarizes the key features in reported unit-level models (using lumped kinetics) applied to reforming processes. We have only included studies where the authors compare their results to pilot-plant or industrial data. In addition, we include those studies where the authors use the model for case studies and plant optimization. 

Table 5.5 Summary of unit-level models reported in the literature. 

Brief survey of existing kinetic and unit level models for reforming processes... 

Measurement Error Uncertainty in the interpretation of unit performance results from statistical errors in the measurements, low levels of process understanding, and differences in unit and modeled performance (Frey, H.C., and E. Rubin, Evaluate Uncertainties in Advanced Process Technologies, Chemical Engineering Progress, May 1992, 63-70). It is difficult to determine which measurements will provide the most insight into unit performance. A necessary first step is the understanding of the measurement errors hkely to be encountered. 

The scheduling models for each refinery convert the preceding information into detailed unit-level directives that provide day-by-day operating conditions or set points. 

Modular simulators are frequently constructed on three levels. The lowest level consists of thermodynamics and other physical property relations that are accessed frequently for a large number of flowsheeting utilities (flash calculations, enthalpy balances, etc.). The next level consists of unit operations models as described above. The highest level then deals with the sequencing and convergence of the flowsheet models. Here, simultaneous... 

Bradbury, J. W. 2002. Insights from process-level modeling of contaminant transport from uranium mill tailings. Annual Meeting Geological Society of America, Denver, CO, United States, 2002. 

From Eq, (1) it is clear that a model of crystal polarization that is adequate for the description of the piezoelectric and pyroelectric properties of the P-phase of PVDF must include an accurate description of both the dipole moment of the repeat unit and the unit cell volume as functions of temperature and applied mechanical stress or strain. The dipole moment of the repeat unit includes contributions from the intrinsic polarity of chemical bonds (primarily carbon-fluorine) owing to differences in electron affinity, induced dipole moments owing to atomic and electronic polarizability, and attenuation owing to the thermal oscillations of the dipole. Previous modeling efforts have emphasized the importance of one more of these effects electronic polarizability based on continuum dielectric theory" or Lorentz field sums of dipole lattices" static, atomic level modeling of the intrinsic bond polarity" atomic level modeling of bond polarity and electronic and atomic polarizability in the absence of thermal motion. " The unit cell volume is responsive to the effects of temperature and stress and therefore requires a model based on an expression of the free energy of the crystal. 

Process-scale models represent the behavior of reaction, separation and mass, heat, and momentum transfer at the process flowsheet level, or for a network of process flowsheets. Whether based on first-principles or empirical relations, the model equations for these systems typically consist of conservation laws (based on mass, heat, and momentum), physical and chemical equilibrium among species and phases, and additional constitutive equations that describe the rates of chemical transformation or transport of mass and energy. These process models are often represented by a collection of individual unit models (the so-called unit operations) that usually correspond to major pieces of process equipment, which, in turn, are captured by device-level models. These unit models are assembled within a process flowsheet that describes the interaction of equipment either for steady state or dynamic behavior. As a result, models can be described by algebraic or differential equations. As illustrated in Figure 3 for a PEFC-base power plant, steady-state process flowsheets are usually described by lumped parameter models described by algebraic equations. Similarly, dynamic process flowsheets are described by lumped parameter models comprising differential-algebraic equations. Models that deal with spatially distributed models are frequently considered at the device... 

This technique was first considered theoretically for molecules by Daily (18, 19) in important papers in 1976 and 1977. In these papers Daily extended the two level model used in atomic systems to molecules and attempted to define the range of utility of the model. Baronavski and McDonald reconsidered the model and made the first experimental measurements in flames under saturated conditions to test the model (20, 21) for C, in acetylene flames. During the same year workers at United Technologies began experimental evaluation of the technique (22) and in the last two... 

Moreover, the fact that, at the unit level, the presence of flow rates of vastly different magnitudes is modeled as a regular perturbation, while at the process... 

Meanwhile, one should note that in chemistry, the process of establishing a "nomenclature" has, in addition to its analogy to the dictionary, a geometrical counterpart in terms of dimension. As well as the formulation, at the systems level, of topologically different models to be used for allocating moieties into distinct taxonomy classes [62], a corresponding development at the unit level is herewith included. 

Figure 10.5 shows profiles of the tendencies due to chemistry and wet deposition as well as emissions including vertical diffusion and convection for NOx and CO at 12 and 24 UTC. The data is area-averaged over Central Europe (42N/-10W - 55N/ lOE) and shown in units of kg/m s to demonstrate the mass contribution of each model level. Model levels 60-50 cover the PEL, the tropopause is about at level 30. Clearly visible is the day-night difference of chemical loss and production. The emissions are a constant source term but the vertical tendency profiles are shaped by the vertical exchange in the boundary layer. 

---