Uniform emission standards

In this uniform approach no account is taken of the volume, and hence mass, and location of the discharge, nor the volume and nature of the receiving water. Thus, although calculated to be correct on average, uniform standards can result in over-protection in some areas and under-protection in others [2]. 

An example of tliis uniform approach is contained in the US Federal Water Pollution Control Act which is to be instituted in two stages. The initial stage is based on the application of the best practicable control technology (BPT) currently available. This progresses to the application of the best available technology (BAT) economically achievable [23]. The US EPA may also set federal standards for effluents to serve as guidehnes for the above [11]. 

---

Emission Standard A quantitative limit on the emission or discharge of a potentially toxic substance from a particular source. Tire simplest system is uniform emission standard where the same limit is placed on all emissions of a particular contaminant. 

Uniform emission standards versus water quality objectives... 

A discussion of water quality control would be incomplete without some consideration of the divergent approaches of those countries favouring uniform emission standards , e.g. USA, German Federal Republic, France and Italy, and those strongly opposed to this approach, e.g. the UK and South Africa, who base control on a system of water quality objectives [2, 22, 23]. 

To add surface area, the supports are uniformly coated with a slurry of gamma-alumina and recalcined under moderate conditions. The wash coat acts to accept the active metals, typically low levels of platinum and palladium, in a conventional impregnation process. In the United States in passenger car apphcations the spherical catalyst is used almost exclusively, and methods have been developed to replace the catalyst without removing the converter shell when vehicle inspection reveals that emission standards are not met. 

Finally, standards may be applied in this way across an industrial sector (uniform emission limits) or may be differentiated with different burdens reflecting different levels of risk to the environment or different prospects of abatement. 

The assumptions made in the development of the above equation are (1) the plume spread has a Gaussian (normal) distribution in both the horizontal and vertical planes, with standard deviations of plume concentration distribution in the horizontal and vertical directions of Gy, and respectively (2) uniform emission rate of pollutants, m (3) total reflection of the plume at ground z = 0 conditions and (4) the plume moves downstream (horizontally in the x direction) with mean wind spead, u. Although any consistent set of units may be used, the cgs system is preferred. For concentrations calculated at ground level (z = 0), the equation simplifies to... 

In summary, the flow and temperature non-uniformities can give rise to non-uniform conversion profiles in a monolith reactor. As long as the desired conversion levels are reached, these non-uniformities are tolerable. However, tightening emission standards require improved catalyst performances while the market for the converters require cheaper units. By carefully analyzing the reactor effluents and adjusting the metal or active component loading radially, it can be possible to obtain close to uniform conversion profiles, and improve the metal economy. 

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) - Uniform national EPA air emission and water effluent standards which limit the amount of pollution allowed from new sources or from modified existing sources. 

SAE has established a Fuel Cells Standard Forum that is chartered with the establishment of standards and test procedures for fuel cell powered vehicles. The committee was established in 1999. The standards will cover the safety, performance, reliability and recyclability of fuel cell systems in vehicles with emphasis on efficiency and environmental impact. The standards will also establish test procedures for uniformity in test results for the vehicle/systems/components performance, and define interface requirements of the systems to the vehicle. Task Groups have been formed in the areas of safety, performance, reliability, emissions, recyclability, interface and miscellaneous. 

Topspe proposed that corner sites are responsible for direct sulfur extraction (A Do) (53-60), but the exact nature of corner sites is not known. What is known is that the active sites for sulfur removal constitute only about 10% of all of the Co(Ni)-Mo-S sites as identified by Mossbauer emission spectroscopy (MES) (57). Thus, there is something special about some of the Co-Mo-S sites. Further study in this area is greatly needed to clarify this issue, and it is recommended that, in the future, authors use terminology in a uniform manner. Some suggestions for standardization are made in later discussions. 

To satisfactorily meet and address these regulatory and market needs, standard methods for emissions testing need to be both robust and repeatable for competent laboratories to carry out, and practical and affordable for manufacturing industry. Uniformity of test methods, between countries and markets is also important if manufacturers are to avoid having to submit the same products for emissions testing by multiple different emissions certification protocols. 

---