Types of Method Transfer

Method transfer is loosely defined as a process that qualifies a laboratory to use a test procedure or analytical method. According to this definition, any and all means of having a laboratory qualified would meet the criteria for transfer. The most common variations of method transfer are comparative testing, covalidation between two laboratories or sites, complete or partial method validation or revalidation, and the omission of formal transfer processes, sometimes termed the transfer waiver.  

Before the performance of method transfer activities involving protocols and acceptance criteria, it was customary for a receiving laboratory to repeat some or all of the validation experiments. This laboratory was thereby deemed to be qualified as described above. The choice of validation parameter(s) depends highly on the type of method being transferred. For example, content uniformity assays to determine consistency of product potency depend heavily on the method and system precision. As a second example, a determination of trace impurities in an API could not be reproduced between two sites if their instruments did not yield similar limits of detection and limits of quantitation. A detailed discussion on the rational choice of validation parameters that would need to be repeated by the receiving laboratory is beyond the scope of this chapter. The reader is referred to the method validation chapter by Crowther et al. for additional information on this subject. 

Certain situations might certainly warrant the omission of conventional transfer qualification experiments. To proceed without some manner of laboratory comparison between the two sites, it is critical to document the reasons for making such a decision. For line extensions involving dosage forms that are 

---

This is a similar approach to that articulated by USP, where transfer waivers can be utilised if the receiving site is considered to be qualified to use the method(s), without comparison or generation of inter-laboratory comparative data. The different types of testing associated with the different types of method transfer, together with acceptance criteria are summarised in Table 5 (Raska et al., 2010). 

Table 5. Typical Analytical Testing and Acceptance Criteria for Different Types of Method Transfer (adapted from Raska et al., 2012)...

I. THE DRUG DEVELOPMENT PROCESS I. TYPES OF METHOD TRANSFER... 

This chapter highlights the important aspects of the analytical transfer processes as they relate to process, compliance, analytical data, and documentation. Types of method transfers and the timeline of transfer activities are discussed. The risk assessment prior to initiation of transfer activities is also described. The chapter describes content and utility of the transfer protocol and final report, as well as documents that govern analytical method transfers (i.e., SOPs and master plan). The importance of selecting appropriate method transfer acceptance criteria and use of statistical methods to evaluate results are described. The significance of the inclusion of an adequate level of detail in the methods, protocol(s), and other documents cannot be overly stressed. Last of all, the process for transfer of technical ownership of the analytical methods is discussed. Other chapters in this text should be consulted for elaboration on the various important facets of technical transfer, including method development, method validation, documentation, and stability. 

In this method, a catalyst is used to carry the nucleophile from the aqueous into the organic phase. As an example, simply heating and stirring a two-phase mixture of 1-chlorooctane for several days with aqueous NaCN gives essentially no yield of 1-cyanooctane. But if a small amount of an appropriate quaternary ammonium salt is added, the product is quantitatively formed in about 2 h." There are two principal types of phase-transfer catalyst. Though the action of the two types is somewhat different, the effects are the same. Both get the anion into the organic phase and allow it to be relatively free to react with the substrate. 

Although phase-transfer catalysis has been most often used for nucleophilic substitutions, it is not confined to these reactions. Any reaction that needs an insoluble anion dissolved in an organic solvent can be accelerated by an appropriate phase transfer catalyst. We shall see some examples in later chapters. In fact, in principle, the method is not even limited to anions, and a small amount of work has been done in transferring cations, radicals, and molecules. The reverse type of phase-transfer catalysis has also been reported transport into the aqueous phase of a reactant that is soluble in organic solvents. ... 

The final contribution is focussed on organic radical cations in a comprehensive and fundamental manner. It starts out with experimental methods of generation and characterization followed by a discussion of various types of electron transfer induced reactions. In the last section unusual structures of radical cations are described. 

IV. Methods of Distinguishing between the Different Types of Energy Transfer Mechanisms. 249... 

Determination of appropriate coefficients of heat transfer is required for design calculations on heat-transfer operations. These coefficients can sometimes be estimated on the basis of past experience, or they can be calculated from empirical or theoretical equations developed by other workers in the field. Many semiempirical equations for the evaluation of heat-transfer coefficients have been published. Each of these equations has its limitations, and the engineer must recognize the fact that these limitations exist. A summary of useful and reliable design equations for estimating heat-transfer coefficients under various conditions is presented in this chapter. Additional relations and discussion of special types of heat-transfer equipment and calculation methods are presented in the numerous books and articles that have been published on the general subject of heat transfer. 

The design of most mass-transfer equipment requires evaluation of the number of theoretical stages or transfer units. Methods for carrying out these calculations for various types of mass-transfer operations are presented in many general chemical engineering books, such as those indicated in the Chemical Engineering Series list of books given at the front of this text. 

The two types of electron transfer in a redox reaction at semiconductors can be distinguished by a number of experimental methods (12,13,14). The mechanisms of some redox reactions at germanium electrodes are summarized In Table I. It is seen that the mechanism of redox reactions with positive normal potentials is associated with the valence band, whereas the mechanism of redox reactions with more negative normal potentials is associated with the conduction band if there is any reaction at all. The situation remains the same when the electrode is moderately polarized in the anodic or cathodic direction. An example is shown in Fig. 11 using a redox system with properties equivalent to those assumed In Fig. 10. 

Since the aim of the protocol is to ensure the mitigation of problems, the essential elements of the protocol consists of sections that include (a) an Introduction, (b) treatment and disposition of data, (c) types of methods being transferred, (d) materials, reference standards, and reagents being used, (e) recommended type of equipment, (f) sample handling, (g) predetermined acceptance criteria, and (h) an Acknowledgment section. An example of a typical table of contents (TOC) of an analytical methods transfer protocol is discussed in Table 16-2. 

Organization of the reaction center in the membrane The PS I centre performs electron transfer from the inside to the outside of the thylakoid, as shown by various functional studies and by the formation of an electrical membrane potential [92]. More details on these structural properties have been obtained by two types of method. 

Another ironic feature of the increasing emphasis on robustness to ensure ease of method transfer is that the quality of HPLC stationary phases is improving. The quality arises from better batch-to-batch reproducibility and more homogeneous surfaces on which only one type of retention mechanism may operate. The irony lies in the fact that in the past it might have been the flaw (e.g. residual silanols on a reversed-phase material) that was responsible for the last bit of selectivity that was needed to achieve a very difficult separation. Now with improved stationary phases, there may be a need for more complex mobile phases thereby compromising robustness once more. 

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is an archetypal heme peroxidase. It is a nonspecific enzyme used for studying the etfect of various substances on HRP-catalyzed electron-transfer reactions.1 2 For the enzyme activity determinations, many substrates and types of methods are used. One of these methods is lumino 1-dependent chemiluminescence (CL). The combination of the enzyme HRP/hydrogen peroxide (H202) system and a chemiluminescent method of detection allows for information to be obtained both about the result of the process and its course. 

Heat is a method of transferring energy. Technically, heat is not a form of energy. The type of energy transferred by heat is called thermal energy, the energy that a substance has due to the kinetic energy of its molecules. Heat has units of Joules. Heat can not be directly measured. Heat must be calculated. 

The synthetic utility of stannane-based reagents is discussed in other chapters of this compilation. While several workers have examined more general types of hydrogen transfer reactions by computational techniques, this chapter will focus on the modeling of hydrogen transfers of synthetic utility, in particular the ability of various modeling methods to accurately predict the stereochemical outcome of free-radical reductions. 

---