Training outcome expectations

Communicating Realistic Socialization and Training Outcome Expectations... 

Makriyannis and Liu claimed a series of pyrazole analogues in a patent application published in 2003 [272]. Of the 29 compounds specifically exemplified in the patent application, compound (389) was demonstrated to reduce lever presses when administered to rats that were trained to expect delivery of a food pellet as the outcome. It was proposed that the reduction in lever pressing was the result of decreased appetite brought about by CBi receptor antagonism. 

Parle, M. et al. (1997). The development of a training model to improve health professionals skills, self efficacy and outcome expectancies when communicating with cancer patients. Social Science and Medicine 44 231-40. 

GR-6.2.2.10 Personnel Training. The Quality System for personnel training shall provide for documentation of the objectives and the expected outcome of the training. The input defining the training needs shall be provided to support each Quality System function and the specific project requirements. 

Proper production process execution and performance of analytical procedures relies on comprehensive, clearly stated, and unambiguous documentation. This is necessary whether the document is used to initiate an activity (e.g., process, method, work instruction) or contains results that will be reviewed by someone else. A master batch record that can be easily misinterpreted by trained operators is a serious source of process variability. Similarly, if the analytical method is not written in a clear, concise, and sufficiently detailed manner, interpretation may be different from analyst to analyst, also resulting in higher than expected variability and perhaps an OOS result. Process and analytical documentation should be written with the user in mind and authored by individuals with intimate familiarity with the task to be carried out. The written procedures should be concise or crisp, yet contain sufficient technical detail to lead trained operators and analysts through the same set of operations with the outcome being the same when applied to the same material(s). 

Develop the detailed objectives of the metrics training system and define what outcomes are expected from the training and how these outcomes will impact the implementation of the metrics system. There will be broad principles that need to apply across the organization and specific task-related knowledge that must be transferred to the practitioners for the metrics system. As the training is defined, estimates for resource needs and time to complete the training can be made. It will... 

A commonly used profile instrument is the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). This instrument includes nine health concepts or scales (Table 2-3). The SF-36 can be self-administered or administered by a trained interviewer (face to face or via telephone). This instrument has several advantages. For example, it is brief (it takes about 5-10 minutes to complete), and its reliability and validity have been documented in many clinical situations and disease states. " A means of aggregating the items into physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores is available." In addition, an abbreviated version of the SF-36 containing only 12 items (SF-12) has been introduced." However, the scale scores and mental and physical component summary scores derived from the SF-12 are based on fewer items and fewer defined levels of health and, as a result, are estimated with less precision and less reliability. The loss of precision and reliability in measurement can be a problem in small samples and/or with small expected effect sizes for an intervention. 

As noted, socialization processes are likely to be perceived in a similar way to prestart training. That is, if an organization has a socialization process where new employees are introduced to safety policy and procedures, it might be reasonable to assume that this will have a positive impact on the new employee s safety-related behavior on the job. A study by Mullen (2004) supported this proposition, finding that early socialization processes could have a positive influence on safety behavior. Of course, socialization processes may have no effect at all. A new employee, who is asked during socialization to learn the organization s safety policy and procedures, understand the organization s emphasis on safety (its safety culture in the form of norms, beliefs, roles, attitudes, and practices), and learn how to complete appropriate forms (such as hazard sheets, near miss reports), may simply not achieve these expected outcomes. To help increase the chances that socialization will have a positive impact on new employees safety, best practice should be adopted. 

The actors involved in performing each task and what the expected outcomes are. The resources and tools which should be used, where they can be found and what training material exists for them. 

More than 90% of cUldren with CP live to adulthood, aldioi their life expectancy is largely dependant on the severity and complexity of dieir condition. Employability is also dependant on the severity of the cmidition, especially cognitive and intellectual ability. However, family support, ftie quality of educational programmes and conununity-based training, and technical support can also influence diis outcome. 

The outcome of mishandling explosives is disastrous and a very unforgiving process. Those individuals who have been specifically trained in the use and handling of explosive are not expected to make mistakes these are unacceptable and usually end in deaths. 

---