Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Toxicity related standards

The flame retardant chemicals industry has historically been driven by regulations and standards. The normal fire-, smoke-, and toxicity-related standards have been joined by environmental standards provoked by the alleged environmental impact of halogens and the alleged toxicity of antimony. Although suitable replacements have not been found for these materials in all cases, the environmental concern has served to depress their growth levels from what it would otherwise have been and/or channel the growth into alternative chemical products. [Pg.130]

The private toxicity databases offer more accurate toxicity data and the extended chemical space of representative structures in comparison with pubhc databases. Despite expansion of the chemical space and various numbers of proposed descriptors, the private databases have limitations related to the models selection, types of algorithms and the content of data, which is probably a part of confidential business information, such as a proprietary structure of pharmaceutical molecules. The private toxicity databases may also provide internal systems created by industry or government agencies [21]. These databases may not be suitable for a commercial usage, but are useful for the internal analysis. Therefore, pubhcation of the scientific research based on these data is often difficult to evaluate independently. The most known commercial databases associated with toxicity are Acceliys Toxicity Database (contains information about the structure and different types of toxicity for more than 150,000 compoimds from RTECS and other sources) and Leadscope Toxicity Database. Standardization of toxicity databases is designed to facilitate integration between different sources and to provide their quality. Since databases are often not compatible with each other, standardization initiatives (e g., controlled vocabularies) can help to combine their data [22]. [Pg.330]

Environmental Aspects. Airborne particulate matter (187) and aerosol (188) samples from around the world have been found to contain a variety of organic monocarboxyhc and dicarboxyhc acids, including adipic acid. Traces of the acid found ia southern California air were related both to automobile exhaust emission (189) and, iadirecfly, to cyclohexene as a secondary aerosol precursor (via ozonolysis) (190). Dibasic acids (eg, succinic acid) have been found even ia such unlikely sources as the Murchison meteorite (191). PubHc health standards for adipic acid contamination of reservoir waters were evaluated with respect to toxicity, odor, taste, transparency, foam, and other criteria (192). BiodegradabiUty of adipic acid solutions was also evaluated with respect to BOD/theoretical oxygen demand ratio, rate, lag time, and other factors (193). [Pg.246]

CAL 133. California Technical Bulletin 133 is a test of the fire hazard associated with upholstered furniture (22). The test is carried out by igniting a standard fire source directiy on the piece of furniture being tested. In the most recent version of the test, the fire source is a gas flame. Smoke, heat, and toxic gas emissions are measured dufing the test. A related test, BS 5852, uses various wooden cribs as the fire source (23). [Pg.466]

The widespread sales of this plasticizer are a redection of its all-around plasticizing performance and its provision of adequate properties for a great many standard products. It possesses reasonable plasticizing efficiency, fusion rate, and viscosity which, coupled with the normally competitive price, go a long way to explaining the popularity of this plasticizer. Some concerns have been periodically raised as to the possible toxicity of this material, but it can be said that these concerns are often related to the vast and widespread study of the toxicity of DEHP. [Pg.122]

Concern has been expressed about the possible formation of dioxins and furans. However, measurements during experiments indicated that the emissions of dioxins and furans were not significantly elevated. Dioxin emissions with or without plastic input appeared to be about a factor of 100 below the standard of 0.1 ng/Nm TEQ TCCD (toxicity equivalent in relation to the toxic dioxin TCCD) (a.7). This might be due to the benefit of the strongly reducing atmosphere and the high temperature of 2100 °C. In total, until now the conclusion has been that at current PVC levels in MSW, pretreatment for chlorine removal is unnecessary. [Pg.9]

Of the three organic phosphorus insecticides—hexaethyl tetraphosphate, tetraethyl pyrophosphate, and parathion—the first two have been shown to be mixtures (36) that contain tetraethyl pyrophosphate as the principal active ingredient. Several methods have been proposed for the determination of this compound in the commercial products (25, 35). All are based on the separation of the tetraethyl pyrophosphate from the related ethyl phosphates, followed by its hydrolysis to diethyl orthophosphoric acid and titration with standard alkali. Both hexaethyl tetraphosphate and tetraethyl pyrophosphate are soluble in water and are rapidly hydrolyzed to monoethyl and diethyl orthophosphoric acid. This rapid hydrolysis to nontoxic products greatly limits the duration of the in- secticidal effectiveness of tetraethyl pyrophosphate, but it also eliminates the danger of toxic residues on the crops treated. [Pg.69]

Many essential transformations of carbohydrates regularly employ toxic and corrosive reagents, such as Lewis acids and strong mineral acids. Hence, the use of zeolites and related porous solids as catalysts in such reactions affords a practical and environmentally compatible alternative to the standard protocols. [Pg.30]

Because of the lack of suitable standard rate of heat, smoke and toxic gas generation tests, the 1988 UK regulations are based on ignition resistance of individual materials. This contradicts the basic requirements for the fire testing of composites and of hazard related tests and as such it may be possible to develop materials which meet the requirements but which produce hazardous products. [Pg.517]

Figure 4 Standard transfection profile of the cationic lipid 10-(cholesteryloxycarbo-nyl-methyl)-l,4,10-triazadecane acetate (CholAc43) (64) on COS-7-cells is shown. A standard transfection experiment comprised eight different lipid/DNA-charge ratios from 1 1 to 1 15 (x-axis). TE (luciferase activity) is expressed in relation to the TE of a standard lipid (DOTAP), determined in the same experiment (DOTAP = 100%, left bar). As a measure of toxicity, the protein content after the transfection experiment is shown in the same diagram (left y-axis). Abbreviation DOTAP, N-[l-2,3-dioleoyloxy)propyl-N,N,N-trimethyl-ammoniumchloride. Figure 4 Standard transfection profile of the cationic lipid 10-(cholesteryloxycarbo-nyl-methyl)-l,4,10-triazadecane acetate (CholAc43) (64) on COS-7-cells is shown. A standard transfection experiment comprised eight different lipid/DNA-charge ratios from 1 1 to 1 15 (x-axis). TE (luciferase activity) is expressed in relation to the TE of a standard lipid (DOTAP), determined in the same experiment (DOTAP = 100%, left bar). As a measure of toxicity, the protein content after the transfection experiment is shown in the same diagram (left y-axis). Abbreviation DOTAP, N-[l-2,3-dioleoyloxy)propyl-N,N,N-trimethyl-ammoniumchloride.
The RfDs and TDIs are often used to establish regulatory standards. Such standards usually specify a limit on the allowable concentration of a chemical in an environmental medium. The process is not difficult to understand. The RfD and its related estimates of population thresholds is a dose, typically expressed in mg/(kg b.w. day), that is considered to be without significant risk to human populations exposed daily, for a lifetime. Consider mercury, a metal for which an RfD of 0.0003 mg/(kg b.w. day) has been established by the EPA, based on certain forms of kidney toxicity observed in rats (Table 8.4). These are not the only toxic effects of mercury, but they are the ones seen at the lowest doses. Note also that we are dealing with inorganic mercury, not the methylated form that is neurotoxic. [Pg.238]


See other pages where Toxicity related standards is mentioned: [Pg.724]    [Pg.724]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.1140]    [Pg.1218]    [Pg.1254]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.1256]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.1383]    [Pg.1462]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.554]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.107 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info