Gas generation tests

The biological methane potential (BMP) is probably the best test to measure the gas generation potential from a degradable carbon-based material. The BMP test 

---

Because of the lack of suitable standard rate of heat, smoke and toxic gas generation tests, the 1988 UK regulations are based on ignition resistance of individual materials. This contradicts the basic requirements for the fire testing of composites and of hazard related tests and as such it may be possible to develop materials which meet the requirements but which produce hazardous products. 

It is important in this experiment to take great care that the gas generator (test tube with nickel electrodes) is removed to a sufficient distance in order to make sure that the oxyhydrogen gas in it does not also explode, as otherwise glass splitters and sulfuric acid will fly across the room The experiment can be repeated several times. 

Kaminski GA, Stern HA, Berne BJ, Friesner RA, Cao YXX, Murphy RB, Zhou RH, Halgren TA (2002) Development of a polarizable force field for proteins via ab initio quantum chemistry first generation model and gas phase tests. J Comput Chem 23(16) 1515—1531... 

In addition to the thermal effects of the reaction, pressure data are acquired from an ARC experiment. As in the closed Dewar flask tests, the pressure is the result of (1) the heating of the free-board gas, (2) the vapor pressure, and (3) the reaction-produced gases. With the pressure-temperature versus time curve, the gas generation of the substance can be calculated (mol gas/mol substance). This is possible if enough knowledge of the gas solubility in the liquid and the vapor pressure of the sample are available. Such a calculation is useful for gas venting estimates for the process. 

The discussions in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 show that the interaction among enthalpies of reaction, reaction kinetics, and surrounding conditions is of paramount importance relative to the existence of potential thermal hazards such as runaways. Whereas valuable information on parameter sensitivity can be estimated by a theoretical approach, it remains of vital importance to evaluate hazards by appropriate and adequate laboratory tests to obtain information on the rates of heat and gas generation, and the maximum quantities of heat and gas involved. Materials which are real to the process should be used in tests to assure that the effects of any contaminants are recognized. 

But after a moment s reflection, we remember that one of the simplest tests for hydrogen gas generation in a test tube is to place a lighted splint nearby, and hear the pop sound of an explosion, i.e. the reaction in Equation (4.19) occurs spontaneously. 

Mixing Calorimetry Instantaneous heat of mixing, AHMI)aNG Gas generation rates Isothermal, from ambient to 150°C Cannot test multi-phase systems... 

The DPT can be used to determine the pressure characteristics and gas generation rates where they occur during a decomposition reaction. The output from the test is a pressure-time plot that you can use to determine the volume of gas generated in the decomposition reaction. 

A number of variations of this test exist. An oven temperature is increased linearly. Continuous monitoring of the temperature and pressure outputs from a sample tube in the oven provides qualitative information about the thermal characteristics of the sample. In many cases, the pressure data can also yield valuable information. Any discontinuity in a plot of In P against 1/T indicates noncondensable gas generation. (The plot is often an essentially straight line if the pressure increase is due solely to the vapor pressure.)... 

Fig. 15.18 SFJ test results obtained with a command signal composed of two sine waves, showing that the generated thrust follows the applied command signals through the gas generator pressure and the ramburner pressure.

CL-20-based propellant formulations based on NC plasticized with BDNPA/F or EPX (a nitramine plasticizer) are reported to be safe for testing in a 40-caliber gun simulator [211]. Lewis et al. studied a CL-20-based pyrotechnic gas-generating formulation that burns down to produce one or more reaction products that suppress fire [212]. Sato and Kodama studied CL-20 as a base charge for detonators [213] and as a filling of detonation cords [214]. 

Gassy systems are "untempered". Removal of gas from the relief system will not stop the temperature from rising and the volumetric rate of gas generation will continue to increase. The- relief system should be designed to cope with the maximum rate of gas generation that can occur before the vessel empties. For untempered systems, it is important to check (by testing) whether or not, as the temperature rises, secondary reactions or decompositions occur (see also Figure... 

Most screening tests are likely to lump all reactions that generate gas together. Tempered hybrid systems will not be distinguished but these will require a smaller relief area than a gassy system with the same gas generation rate. If the worst case is subsequently-found to be a tempered hybrid reaction, rather than a gassy system, then some reiteration to check that it is still the worst case may be required. 

However, it must be recognised that these maximum rates will be underestimates due to the heat losses from thej sample in the tests. Careful interpretation is needed when using such non-adiabatic screening tests to find the worst case, and this is best done by skilled and experienced analysts. In addition, for gas-generating systems, it may be difficult to contain the peak pressure using a screening test such as the Carius tube. The use of an adiabatic screening test (see 3.5.3 below) may therefore be preferred. - ... 

---