Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Theories of Domain Formation

The characteristic feature of block copolymers in the solid state is their microphase separated structure, with domains of the minor component dispersed in a matrix of the major component Domain symmetry is chiefly determined by copolymer composition, however, the route to the solid state (i.e. melt prepared or solvent cast) may influence this factor. The major aim of recent small angle scattering experiments on block copolymers has been the investigation of current statistical thermodynamic theories of domain formation. In this respect, it should also be noted that small angle X-ray scattering has been used to investigate block copolymers, the work of Hashimoto et al. being particularly noteworthy. [Pg.12]

An exhaustive, critical review of the status concerning current statistical thermodynamic analysis of block copolymer domain formation will not be presented here. A precis only of the major theories is given and the predictions from each noted, fuller details are available in the original publications. Furthermore, whilst the earlier theories of Meierand Williams were important in stimulating interest and defining the questions to be addressed, they are not considered here since the more recent ideas encompass all the features of the earlier theories. [Pg.12]

Perhaps the most detailed statistical thermodynamic theory of microdomain formation is that due to Helfand and Wasserman In common with other [Pg.12]

Where Mq is the molecular weight of the domain forming blodr and M the molecular weight of the copolymer. [Pg.13]

In summary, Helfands NIA theory predicts molecular weight dependencies of domain size, separation and other parameters of the phase separated copolymers with the presumption of an interface of constant thickness at the-domain boundary. [Pg.13]


Dale Meier has been one of the firsts if not the first who presented a theory of domain formation in block copolymers39. In its original version39, Meier s theory was restricted to AB block copolymers and spherical domains. In a series of following papers40-45, however, Meier has refined his theory considering different shapes of domains, the effect of the presence of a solvent, the dimensions of the interface, the interfacial properties of block copolymers and the solubilization of homopolymers by copolymers. [Pg.98]

In this article, the analysis of microdomain and do-main-boundary structures of amorphous block copolymers is first investigated by means of small angle X-ray scattering and electron microscopy. The structures, especially for alternating lamellar microdomains of a series of A-B type block copolymers of styrene and isoprene, are discussed in comparison with those predicted from the current theories of domain formation by Meier and Helfand-... [Pg.245]

Pressure was found to decrease the rate of thermal decomposition of P HMX, while temperature increased the rate in typical Arrhenius behavior. The decomposition reaction followed a Prout-Tompkins equation, ln[a/(l-a)j = kt, which is based on the theory of nuclei formation with branching interference characteristic of the decomposition of single solid materials. Activation energies decrease with increasing pressure in a linear fashion with the value tending toward zero at very high pressures. The volume of activation is positive for the decomposition and essentially constant over the P,T domain studied. The reactants undergo a 3% increase in volume to... [Pg.408]

Meier D.J., Theory of block copolymers Domain formation in A-B block copolymers, J. Polym. Sci., Part C, 26, 81, 1969. [Pg.159]

A number of statistical thermodynamic theories for the domain formation in block and graft copolymers have been formulated on the basis of this idea. The pioneering work in this area was done by Meier (43). In his original work, however, he assumed that the boundary between the two phases is sharp. Leary and Williams (43,44) were the first to recognize that the interphase must be diffuse and has finite thickness. Kawai and co-workers (31) treated the problem from the point of view of micelle formation. As the solvent evaporates from a block copolymer solution, a critical micelle concentration is reached. At this point, the domains are formed and are assumed to undergo no further change with continued solvent evaporation. Minimum free energies for an AB-type block copolymer were computed this way. [Pg.190]

A number of polymeric systems exhibit domain formation. This results in some polymeric material being confined in regions between the domains. The deformation properties of these systems depend on the types of polymer chains lying between the domains, as well as on the shape and spatial arrangement of the domains. Several theories have been proposed to date for the contribution of the interdomain material to different deformation properties in semicrystalline polymers and block copolymers. We will present and analyze these theories herein. [Pg.231]

The tenet of classical rubber theory has been that the chains are in random networks and the networks comprise a Gaussian distribution of end-to-end chain lengths. However, the mechanisms and molecular bases for the elasticity of proteins are more complex than that of natural rubber. In biological systems elastomeric proteins consist of domains with blocks of repeated sequences that imply the formation of regular stmctures and domains where covalent or noncovalent cross-linking occurs. Although characterised elastomeric proteins differ considerably in their precise amino acid sequences they all contain elastomeric domains comprised of repeated sequences. It has also been suggested that several of these proteins contain p-tums as a structural motif (Tatham and Shewry 2000). [Pg.86]

The complexity of the system implies that many phenomena are not directly explainable by the basic theories of semiconductor electrochemistry. The basic theories are developed for idealized situations, but the electrode behavior of a specific system is almost always deviated from the idealized situations in many different ways. Also, the complex details of each phenomenon are associated with all the processes at the silicon/electrolyte interface from a macro scale to the atomic scale such that the rich details are lost when simplifications are made in developing theories. Additionally, most theories are developed based on the data that are from a limited domain in the multidimensional space of numerous variables. As a result, in general such theories are valid only within this domain of the variable space but are inconsistent with the data outside this domain. In fact, the specific theories developed by different research groups on the various phenomena of silicon electrodes are often inconsistent with each other. In this respect, this book had the opportunity to have the space and scope to assemble the data and to review the discrete theories in a global perspective. In a number of cases, this exercise resulted in more complete physical schemes for the mechanisms of the electrode phenomena, such as current oscillation, growth of anodic oxide, anisotropic etching, and formation of porous silicon. [Pg.442]

The importance of this Feuerbachian analysis for the formation of Marx s thought can hardly be exaggerated. It provides the matrix not only for his theory of religion, but for his theory of politics and his theory of capital as well. The common theme in all three cases is that man becomes the slave to his ovm product. I shall pursue below the specifically ideological theme, but first adduce some passages that show how Marx came to generalize it to other domains. [Pg.479]

To conclude the discussion of some technological aspects of the theory of DS, we shall touch upon the question of its role in the catalytic reaction kinetics. Since Langmuir s time, the kinetic laws of a heterogeneous catalytic process have been described exclusively by models involving ordinary differential equation sets. Our results indicate also that under experimental conditions, the researcher is most likely to run into the stratification phenomena, the domain structure formation in a kinetic reactor (stationary. [Pg.601]


See other pages where Theories of Domain Formation is mentioned: [Pg.250]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.501]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.125]   


SEARCH



Domain formation

© 2024 chempedia.info