Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Domain structure formation

To conclude the discussion of some technological aspects of the theory of DS, we shall touch upon the question of its role in the catalytic reaction kinetics. Since Langmuir s time, the kinetic laws of a heterogeneous catalytic process have been described exclusively by models involving ordinary differential equation sets. Our results indicate also that under experimental conditions, the researcher is most likely to run into the stratification phenomena, the domain structure formation in a kinetic reactor (stationary. [Pg.601]

Although the properties of ferroelectric superlattices can be governed by domain structure, no systematic study of this effect has been performed. In other words, the physics of the domain structure formation at the FE phase transition temperature T=Tc in the FE multilayers remains poorly understood. Here we address the question of a phase transition temperature in a periodic superlattice structure consisting of alternate ferroelectric (FE) and paraelectric (PE) layers of nanometric thickness. To get rid of the effect of 90° ferroelastic domains we assume that FE layers have either natural or strain-induced c-oriented uniaxial symmetry. [Pg.101]

Fig. 5 Simulation of the compression of randomly situated monodisperse particles. The maximum surface coverage is lower than in perfect hexagonal order owing to the lattice defects. Domain structure formation can be observed... Fig. 5 Simulation of the compression of randomly situated monodisperse particles. The maximum surface coverage is lower than in perfect hexagonal order owing to the lattice defects. Domain structure formation can be observed...
A very special type of ABA block copolymer where A is a thermoplastic (e.g., styrene) and B an elastomer (e.g., butadiene) can have properties at ambient temperatures, such as a crosslinked rubber. Domain formations (which serves as a physical crosslinking and reinforcement sites) impart valuable features to block copolymers. They are thermoplastic, can be eaisly molded, and are soluble in common solvents. A domain structure can be shown as in Fig. 2. [Pg.726]

Since some structural and dynamic features of w/o microemulsions are similar to those of cellular membranes, such as dominance of interfacial effects and coexistence of spatially separated hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanoscopic domains, the formation of nanoparticles of some inorganic salts in microemulsions could be a very simple and realistic way to model or to mimic some aspects of biomineralization processes [216,217]. [Pg.491]

Fig. 31 Structural formation model for the initial stage of polymer crystallization [19], N G nucleation and growth of oriented domains, SD spinodal decomposition into oriented and unoriented domains, Tb, Ts, and Tx bimodal, spinodal, and crystallization temperatures, respectively I isotropic, N smectic, and C crystalline... Fig. 31 Structural formation model for the initial stage of polymer crystallization [19], N G nucleation and growth of oriented domains, SD spinodal decomposition into oriented and unoriented domains, Tb, Ts, and Tx bimodal, spinodal, and crystallization temperatures, respectively I isotropic, N smectic, and C crystalline...
Crane et al. first established the three-dimensional fold of NOS by solving the structure of a monomeric form of the mouse iNOS heme domain (78). This version of iNOS was missing the first 114 residues, which are known to be critical for dimer formation and activity (79). The monomer structure was soon followed by the dimeric heme domain structures of mouse iNOS (80), bovine eNOS (81), and the human isoforms of iNOS (82, 83) and eNOS (82). A comparison of eNOS and iNOS reveals that the structures are essentially the same with an overall root-mean-square deviation in backbone atoms of 1.1 A (S3). The sequence identity between human iNOS and bovine eNOS is 60% for 420 residues compared in the crystal structures (83). [Pg.251]

Fig. 4.8. Functional domains, DNA-binding and HRE structure of the steroid hormone receptors. a) domain structure of the steroid hormone receptor. AFl, AF2 domains that mediate the stimulation of the transcription, b) schematic representation of the two Zn -Cys4 binding motils of the DNA-binding domains, c) Complex formation between the dimeric DNA-binding domains of the gluccocorticoid receptor and the HRE. The black spheres represent Zn ions. After Luisi et al., 199L d) Consensus sequence and configuration of the HRE elements of the steroid hormone receptor. Fig. 4.8. Functional domains, DNA-binding and HRE structure of the steroid hormone receptors. a) domain structure of the steroid hormone receptor. AFl, AF2 domains that mediate the stimulation of the transcription, b) schematic representation of the two Zn -Cys4 binding motils of the DNA-binding domains, c) Complex formation between the dimeric DNA-binding domains of the gluccocorticoid receptor and the HRE. The black spheres represent Zn ions. After Luisi et al., 199L d) Consensus sequence and configuration of the HRE elements of the steroid hormone receptor.
The existence of the (quasi) steady-state in the model of particle accumulation (particle creation corresponds to the reaction reversibility) makes its analogy with dense gases or liquids quite convincing. However, it is also useful to treat the possibility of the pattern formation in the A + B —> 0 reaction without particle source. Indeed, the formation of the domain structure here in the diffusion-controlled regime was also clearly demonstrated [17]. Similar patterns of the spatial distributions were observed for the irreversible reactions between immobile particles - Fig. 1.20 [25] and Fig. 1.21 [26] when the long range (tunnelling) recombination takes place (recombination rate a(r) exponentially depends on the relative distance r and could... [Pg.34]

As earlier for the case U b = 0 (Fig. 6.35), the correlation functions XA(r,t) and Y(r, t) shown in Fig. 6.38 (a) and (b) demonstrate appearance of the domain structure in a reaction volume with interacting particles, having the distinctive size = y/Dt. Interaction within AB pairs holds at the relative distances r re (at long times rc < takes place) and only slightly modifies the AB pair distribution on the domain boundaries, where the reaction takes place, but do not influence essentially the entire mechanism of the domain formation (the effect of statistical aggregation). [Pg.370]

Figure 9.12 Seed scattering at refractive index modulations induced by localized internal random fields via the electro-optic effect. The internal fields are also responsible for the formation of a rich ferroelectric domain structure. Here, a periodic sequence of domains with lengths A d is shown. Note, that the grating period of the refractive index modulation As is equal to the lengths of the ferroelectric domains. Figure 9.12 Seed scattering at refractive index modulations induced by localized internal random fields via the electro-optic effect. The internal fields are also responsible for the formation of a rich ferroelectric domain structure. Here, a periodic sequence of domains with lengths A d is shown. Note, that the grating period of the refractive index modulation As is equal to the lengths of the ferroelectric domains.
The domain structure, which appears in MnF2 at the spin-flop transition illustrates a general thermodynamic law of intermediate state formation in the process of first-order phase transitions, induced by a magnetic field, and under the condition that the surface energy of the interface boundary (a > 0) is positive. [Pg.96]

Typical concentrations of dopants (0.05-5 at.%) must result in the formation of dipolar pairs between an appreciable fraction of the dopant ions and the vacancies, e.g. 2La A-VA or 2Fel i+ -V( ). Donor-cation vacancy combinations can be assumed to have a stable orientation so that their initially random state is unaffected by spontaneous polarization or applied fields. Acceptor-oxygen vacancy combinations are likely to be less stable and thermally activated reorientation may take place in the presence of local or applied fields. The dipoles, once oriented in a common direction, will provide a field stabilizing the domain structure. A reduction in permittivity, dielectric and mechanical loss and an increase in the coercive field will result from the inhibition of wall movement. Since the compliance is affected by the elastic movement of 90° walls under stress, it will also be reduced by domain stabilization. [Pg.358]


See other pages where Domain structure formation is mentioned: [Pg.245]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.1345]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.14]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 , Pg.107 ]




SEARCH



Domain formation

Domain structure

Formate structure

Structural domains

Structural formation

Structure formation

Structure formats

© 2024 chempedia.info