The blind review

There is one final opportunity to revisit the proposed methods of statistical analysis prior to the breaking of the blind, or in an unblinded trial, before the statistics group have seen study data. This so-called blind review usually takes place around the time of database lock and the following lists some of the aspects of analysis that would generally be considered  

Under normal circumstances the blind review should take place over a 24 or 48 hour period to limit delays in beginning the analysis proper. The blind review should be documented, detailing precisely what was done. 

Sometimes the blind review can throw up data issues that require further evaluation by the data management group with data queries being raised, and these perhaps may result in changes to the database. This sequence of events can cause major headaches and delays in the data analysis and reporting, and so it is important in the planning phase to get the data validation plan correct so that issues are identified and dealt with in an ongoing way. 

The SAP will have detailed the precise methods of analysis and presentation and should ideally be finalised well before database lock. This enables work to begin in good time on the programming of the analyses. These programs will be tested on dirty data from the trial, so that they can be pretty much finalised before the trial ends, enabling, at least in theory, rapid turnaround of the key analyses. 

---

Any final decisions regarding combinations should be made at the Blind Review stage prior to breaking the blind. 

We will discuss the decision-making process with regard to the Statistical Analysis Plan and the Blind Review in Section 16.3. 

If new knowledge becomes available regarding important covariates after completion of the statistical analysis plan then modify the plan at the blind review stage. 

The definition of a per-protocol set of subjects allows us to get closer to the scientific question by including only those patients who comply with the protocol to a defined extent. The per-protocol set, like the full analysis set, must be prespecified in the protocol and then defined at the patient level at the blind review, following database lock, but before breaking the blind. It must be noted, however, that the per-protocol set is subject to bias and further, tends to overestimate the treatment effect. For this reason it is usually used only as a secondary analysis, supportive hopefully of the findings based on the full analysis set. 

The blind review does offer an opportunity to make some final changes to the planned statistical methods and this opportunity should not be missed but remember this is based on blinded data. 

An outlier is an unusual data point well away from most of the data. Usually the outlier in question will not have been anticipated and the identification of these points and appropriate action should be decided at the blind review. 

The [statistical] plan should be reviewed and possibly updated as a result of the blind review of the data. .. and should be finalized before breaking the blind. Formal records should be kept of when the statistical... 

American Foundation for the Blind Reviews products for persons who are blind or have low vision. Produces fact sheets on many topics. 

Ivia splendens double-blind study is comphf in an interview that I gave for the Entheogen ebert Speaks... The Entheogen Review. 1999 e d by Will Beifuss. 

There has been significant effort expended in trying to relate the genetic code to the simpler conditions of color blindness. However, the papers reviewed below have consistently taken a very elementary view of the operation of the visual system. They have assumed that all failures related to abnormal color vision are based on the chemistry of the chromophores. Section 18.1 provides a more comprehensive description of the types and potential sources of such failures. Section 18.1.5.6.4 documents the very important work of Lakowski. Lakowski documents the variety of failures that can occur within the neurological portion of the visual system. 

The 1987 Nathans paper is one of the earliest reviewing the relationship of the genetic code to the form of the chromophores of vision and includes many references to other areas of vision. It includes several code sequences associated with three entrons he believes relate to the rhodopsin molecule. Nathan notes that one school of analysis associates color blindness with chromophore deficiencies while another associates the problem with errors in the neural circuitry. However, his paper focuses on deficiencies in the chromophores. He presents a simplified explanation of color blindness wherein a total loss of the M-channel chromophore results in deuteranopia while a similar total loss of the L-channel chromophore results in protanopia. These are not the... 

When a manuscript is submitted for consideration, peer review provides the editor with advice on whether to accept the manuscript for publication. Reviewers also provide suggestions for improving the manuscript. The decision on whether to accept the manuscript for publication rests solely with the editor. Reviewers provide additional expertise and have perspectives that may complement that of the editor. Customarily, peer review is anonymous the identities of reviewers are not revealed by editors. Some journals also hold authors names and affiliations in confidence, a double-blind review approach. Occasionally, reviewers request... 

In the full review process, a modified block randomization scheme was used to confirm inclusion and to abstract information and assess the quality of each article. Each paper was randomly assigned to two of four reviewers. Reviewers were blinded to original authors names, affiliations, and journal of publication. Reviews were recorded on a standard case report form and entered into a database for analysis. Discrepancies between reviewers were arbitrated by group consensus. Reviewers first made a final check of inclusion and exclusion criteria to exclude further any nonapplicable articles. Reviewers recorded the study setting, objectives, methods, results, and any additional comments. 

The addition of extra placebo patients adversely affects efficiency and there are many circumstances under which it should be accepted that the most sensible course is to run the trial in an open fashion. It may be possible to include other safeguards such as blinded review of certain outcomes, but the fact that the most sensible design for some practical and economic phase IV type questions is an open-label study is probably insufficiently appreciated. 

The pathophysiology and clinical setting of the blind-loop syndrome have been reviewed recently by Donaldson (30). It is clear that a resident bacterial flora in the proximal small intestine has a major role in the development of the absorptive and luminal defects which have been observed repeatedly in these patients (20,31-35), who have a variety of basic illness, and in experimental animals (31,36) in which an antiperistaltic pouch has been constructed either in the proximal or middle jejunum. However, the presence and extent of the absorptive defects, i.e., vitamin B12, folate, xylose, and lipid, as well as the extent of luminal metabolic alteration of bile salts have varied in individual patients. This variability is probably related to... 

All chapters have gone through a rigorous, double-blind review process before acceptance. It is hoped that the readers will find these chapters informative, enlightening, and helpful. 

I want to thank all the authors for their excellent contributions to this book. Fm also grateful to all the reviewers, including most of the contributing authors, who served as referees for chapters written by other authors, and provided constructive and comprehensive reviews in the double-blind review process. 

In a study conducted by Vos et al. (2003) the unfolded cube display method was compared to a conventional 3D (two-directional) review approach. Two blinded trained observers reviewed a selected population of 30 patients twice, with a median interval of more than 11 weeks between the reviews. The observers first used the unfolded cube display method for polyp detection, and then, in random order, the conventional 3D method. The viewing angle in the conventional review method was set to 120° to compromise between image distortion and surface visibility. Surface visibility, evaluation time per patient, as well as sensitivity and specificity, were compared between both approach. 

This book includes research contributions of geographically dispersed authors from Asia, Africa, Americas, and Europe. The high scientific quality of the chapters was assured by a rigorous double-blind review process implemented by the ICLS 2015 organizers. 

Initially, the IRT mandated blinding of the positive control, but this requirement was later dropped based on an internal IRT review of TQT smdies presented in 2008 (Garnett et al. 2008) and subsequent discussions in the E14 Implementation Working group [Question 7 in ICH E14 Questions Answers (2012)]. Exceptions exist when the nested crossover moxifloxacin/placebo comparison is used in parallel-designed TQT studies, moxifloxacin has to be blinded to protect the blinding of placebo. 

---