Testing acceptance tests

Transport and delivery of materials and equipment Inspection of equipment entering the site Storage of equipment awaiting installation Storage of spares and consumables Installation of equipment Commissioning tests Acceptance tests... 

Acceptance tests should be documented. Local regulations, insurance carriers, and company requirements may require that officials from these groups witness the acceptance testing. Acceptance testing typically includes ... 

Effective testing/acceptance testing By acceptance testing we mean measuring liking or preference for a product. Preference is that expression of appeal of one product versus another that can be measured directly by comparing two or more products with each other. The nine-point hedonic scale method... 

Test (vibration testing, acceptance testing, life testing, coupon testing, etc.)... 

For example, List of module tests, functional test, acceptance tests, environmental tests. Validation Plan/Report... 

The basic condition of the Standard application - the availability of stable coupled probabilistic or the multiple probabilistic relations between then controlled quality indexes and magnetic characteristics of steel. All the probabilistic estimates, used in the Standard, are applied at confidence level not less than 0,95. General requirements to the means of control and procedure of its performance are also stipulated. Engineers of standard development endeavoured take into consideration the existed practice of technical control performance and test at the enterprises that is why the preparation of object control for the performance of nondestructive test can be done during the process of ordinary acceptance test. It is suggested that every enterprise is operated in correspondence with direct and non-destructive tests, obtained exactly at it, for detailed process chart and definite product type, however the tests have long since been performed after development of the Standard displayed that process gives way to unification. 

It obvious a today s demand on repetitive inspections to predict the safety of pressure equipments during the oncoming service period. The acceptance from the industry for this kind of testing is accessible, if you can fulfil this requirement an enlarge in this way the competitiveness. 

However, it is possible that friction events from rubbing between fractured surfaces can be generated at low load levels also during the loading part of the cycle. This is depicted in the two correlation plots of Figure 5. In the plot at the bottom, these events are marked with a rectangle. It was decided that in addition to the previous filter, another filter based in load level should be added. Acoustic emission events were thus accepted only if they occurred at a load higher than 85% of the maximum load level of the test. 

Radiographic inspection is performed to reach a decision about the acceptability of the component or product being tested. Before any evaluation can be made, the interpreter must be certain that the images are satisfactory. In addition, the interpreter must have a solid understanding of the following in order to be successful with the interpretation of the radiographic film for welding quality. 

The next phase which resulted in the worldwide acceptance of eddy current technology for testing metals was the work of Dr Friedrich Foerster. Dr Foerster, a modem Giant, has rightly been called the father of modern eddy current testing (Ref 5). His early work was driven by the priorities of the Second World War, after which he embarked upon major research and... 

Detection of this particle accumulation has so far been done visually. To make the particles more easily visible, they have been chemically treated in order to make them light up or flouresce when struck by an ultraviolet light. The operator sits in a darkened room in which the test pieces are illuminated by ultraviolet light. Cracks show up very clearly and in principle this method of inspection is acceptable. Despite the effiency of this method it is well known that a large number of defective pieces pass this test. Why is it so ... 

In addition, the mirrors are adjustable, so that unimportant areas can be ignored. Light re-emmited from the surfaee is detected, and the detector signal is transmitted to a computer programmed with acceptable deviation levels for comparison with a reference component. Tolerance levels can vary for different areas of the same test piece they may, for example, be higher on a ground section than on adjacent unmachined areas. 

The computer also can leam from a defect-free test piece by rutming such a piece in a readmode. For example, if a drilled hole for lubrication purposes is present at the same location on all parts, the computer will recognise this signal and accept it on all test pieces. The computer will actually be comparing the test piece under scrutiny with standard non-defect master. In addition a reference test piece should be used to check that the specified reference defects really will be detected. This is needed to adjust the settings and sensitivity of the system. 

F.H. Dijkstra, J.A. de Raad and T. Bouma, TOFD Acceptance Criteria a Perfect Team. 14" World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, New Delhi, India, December 1996... 

O. Farli, R.M. Denys, S. Crutzen, Development of Acceptance Criteria for Pipeline Girth Weld Defects. European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, Copenhagen, 26 - 29 May 1998... 

The extensive use of the Young equation (Eq. X-18) reflects its general acceptance. Curiously, however, the equation has never been verified experimentally since surface tensions of solids are rather difficult to measure. While Fowkes and Sawyer [140] claimed verification for liquids on a fluorocarbon polymer, it is not clear that their assumptions are valid. Nucleation studies indicate that the interfacial tension between a solid and its liquid is appreciable (see Section K-3) and may not be ignored. Indirect experimental tests involve comparing the variation of the contact angle with solute concentration with separate adsorption studies [173]. 

Boron trioxide is not particularly soluble in water but it slowly dissolves to form both dioxo(HB02)(meta) and trioxo(H3B03) (ortho) boric acids. It is a dimorphous oxide and exists as either a glassy or a crystalline solid. Boron trioxide is an acidic oxide and combines with metal oxides and hydroxides to form borates, some of which have characteristic colours—a fact utilised in analysis as the "borax bead test , cf alumina p. 150. Boric acid. H3BO3. properly called trioxoboric acid, may be prepared by adding excess hydrochloric or sulphuric acid to a hot saturated solution of borax, sodium heptaoxotetraborate, Na2B407, when the only moderately soluble boric acid separates as white flaky crystals on cooling. Boric acid is a very weak monobasic acid it is, in fact, a Lewis acid since its acidity is due to an initial acceptance of a lone pair of electrons from water rather than direct proton donation as in the case of Lowry-Bronsted acids, i.e. 

The integral of the Gaussian distribution function does not exist in closed form over an arbitrary interval, but it is a simple matter to calculate the value of p(z) for any value of z, hence numerical integration is appropriate. Like the test function, f x) = 100 — x, the accepted value (Young, 1962) of the definite integral (1-23) is approached rapidly by Simpson s rule. We have obtained four-place accuracy or better at millisecond run time. For many applications in applied probability and statistics, four significant figures are more than can be supported by the data. 

A statement that the difference between two values is too great to be explained by indeterminate error accepted if the significance test shows that null hypothesis should be rejected (Ha). 

Relationship between confidence intervals and results of a significance test, (a) The shaded area under the normal distribution curves shows the apparent confidence intervals for the sample based on fexp. The solid bars in (b) and (c) show the actual confidence intervals that can be explained by indeterminate error using the critical value of (a,v). In part (b) the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. In part (c) the null hypothesis is retained. 

The value of fexp is then compared with a critical value, f(a, v), which is determined by the chosen significance level, a, the degrees of freedom for the sample, V, and whether the significance test is one-tailed or two-tailed. For paired data, the degrees of freedom is - 1. If fexp is greater than f(a, v), then the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted. If fexp is less than or equal to f(a, v), then the null hypothesis is retained, and a significant difference has not been demonstrated at the stated significance level. This is known as the paired f-test. 

The accuracy of a spectrophotometer can be checked by measuring absorbances for a series of standard dichromate solutions that can be obtained in sealed cuvettes from the National institute of Standards and Technology. Absorbances are measured at 257 nm and compared with the accepted values. The results obtained when testing a newly purchased spectrophotometer are shown here. Determine if the tested spectrophotometer is accurate at a = 0.05. 

The design of a collaborative test must provide the additional information needed to separate the effect of random error from that due to systematic errors introduced by the analysts. One simple approach, which is accepted by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, is to have each analyst analyze two samples, X and Y, that are similar in both matrix and concentration of analyte. The results obtained by each analyst are plotted as a single point on a two-sample chart, using the result for one sample as the x-coordinate and the value for the other sample as the -coordinate. ... 

---