System safety Military Standard

System safety is a mishap risk management process, whereby mishap risk is identified through hazards, and if the risk does not meet the established level of acceptability, design action is taken to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. For various reasons, it is often impossible to eliminate mishap risk in many systems. System safety should be involved in establishing the criteria and constraints for acceptable risk for system programs. Military standard (MIL-STD)-882 identifies the criteria for four levels of risk high, serious, medium, and low, each of which is accepted by a different level of decision authority. 

U S. Department of Defense, MIL-STD-882-C, "Military Standard System Safety Program Requirements," Washington, DC, January 1993. 

The primary document outlining risk assessment methods in the U.S. Department of Defense is a Military Standard, Ref. 39. This document requires a well-documented system safety program, based on risk assessment methods to be included in all new Department of Defense systems and facilities. Hazards analyses of the systems are mandated by this publication. 

Department of Defense (U.S.), Military Standard System Safety Program Requirements. MIL-STD (w/notice 1), Washington, D.C., 1987. 

Several texts include hazard analysis and risk assessment decision matrices. Every matrix I found has been adopted from those included in what was originally known as Military Standard—System Safety Program Requirements, MlL-STD-882. Its most recent version is now named Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882D, 2000. Influence of that standard will be obvious in the remainder of this chapter. 

There were many developments to advance system safety in the military branches and at the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA), commencing in the 1960s. Several governmental standards have been issued on system safety, following the intent of what is known as MIL-STD-882. Its most recent modification, made in 2000, is titled the Standard Practice for System Safety Department of Defense and is identified as MIL-STD-882D. 

A new issue of Military Standard 882 in the year 2000 provided for a modified approach to system safety achievement. The Standard was renamed, as a Standard Practice for System Safety and its implementation is further discussed in Chapter 3 Current Approaches to System Safety. Suffice to say here, the standard allows for flexibility in implementation while preserving basic system safety requirements. 

As this edition is published, the current MIL-STD-882 is the D version and, therefore, discussion of that approach to system safety implementation follows. The D version responds to changes in the defense acquisition procedures and is no longer the source for safety-related data item descriptions (the formal detailed requirements associated with defense procurement contracts). Therefore, for several reasons, the more detailed methods of implementation of previous versions of the military standard are retained because they are still valid. This is for two reasons. First, there are some government contracts with very long periods of performance or those that have been renewed multiple times that still refer to the earlier standard version. Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, the implementation method of the previous versions provides a guide for implementation of the newer standard practice. ... 

MIL-STD-882B Military Standard 882B, System Safety Program Requirements (DOD)... 

Different organizations have variations for the appUcation of system safety methods and procedures. Military Standard 882 (MIL-STD 882) addresses an approach for mishaps and risks encountered during the development, testing, production, use, and disposal of systems, subsystems, equipment, and facilities. Those engaged in military acquisitions have used the procedures in MIL-STD 882 for a long time to identify, evaluate, and mitigate mishap risks to an acceptable level. 

What military standard documents the general procedures for system safety ... 

MIL STD 882D a military standard that specifically deals with system safety techniques and program requirements. 

The assurance of critical systems was discussed for approaches that employ formal methods and testing for applications as well as underlying software layers. In addition, a number of results that target specific domains such as military systems, safety-critical product lines and peer-to-peer control and data acquisition systems were presented. These papers provided a good introduction into the specific requirements of these domains and presented specific solutions for their domain. Furthermore, the interplay of architecture modeling and existing domain-specific safety standards was discussed in the context of automotive systems. 

Military Handbook (MIL-HDBK)-516B, Airworthiness Certification, DoD Handbook, delineates the U.S. military aircraft airworthiness certification process. It also contains a list of the typical certification data required for airworthiness certification, which leads to a flight clearance. It includes a section on system safety, a system safety program (SSP), and a software safety program (SwSP). System safety generally provides the safety evaluation of hardware and software for airworthiness flight clearance recommendations. System safety is involved in ensuring that the Aircraft Airworthiness Authority s standards are satisfied for the airworthiness authority involved. 

Military Standard (MIL-STD)-882D, Standard Practice for System Safety, February 10,2000. 

Consequently, the Software Systems Engineering Initiative (SSEI) has been tasked by the MOD with the production of a Standard of Best Practice (SoBP) for assessing software compliance with DS 00-56 Issue 4. The remit of this SoBP is to address all aspects of software contribution to system safety, from the integration of COTS software into safety-critical systems, to the use of civil standards such as DO-178B for military applications. 

Military Standard, (1969) Department of Defence System Safety Program Requirements , MIL-STD-882, USA. 

In Chapter 1, we consider the legal issues associated with system safety. The purpose of this chapter is to reinforce the liabilities assumed in the generation of safety related documentation. In Chapter 2 we attempt to put the term safety into perspective, and the basic approaches used to achieve it. The next three chapters will then explore three of these approaches the use of Regulatory Standards is explored in Chapter 3 Chapter 4 considers the risk-based approach, which is widely adopted in the military industry as well as by Health Safety specialists Chapter 5 introduces the civil aeronautical approach to safety assessments, which (for the want of a better term) we shall call the goal-based approach (in contrast to the risk-based approach in Chapter 4) as it provides clear goals (i.e. failure probability targets) for system designers to achieve. 

The HA safety technique is described in MIL-STD-882C Military Standard System Safety Program Requirements. This standard provides uniform requirements in a system safety program to identify hazards of a systan and to impose design requirements and management controls to prevent mishaps. Early hazard identification and elimination or reduction of associated risk are essential to a formal safety program. 

MIL-STD-882C Military Standard System Safety Program Reqnirements, 19 January 1993. 

Many compounds explode when triggered by a suitable stimulus however, most are either too sensitive or fail to meet cost and production-scale standards, requirements for safety in transportation, and storage stability. Propellants and explosives in large-scale use are based mosdy on a relatively small number of well-proven iagredients. Propellants and explosives for military systems are manufactured ia the United States primarily ia government owned plants where they are also loaded iato munitions. Composite propellants for large rockets are produced mainly by private iadustry, as are small arms propellants for sporting weapons. 

---