Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfactant observations

The more hydrophobic (e.g., long chain length) the oil phase, the higher is the Nqq value. In the case of non-alkane oils, an equivalent alkane carbon number (EACN) is used (Acosta and Bhakta 2009) ( )(A) or/(A) is a factor that takes into account the influence of co-surfactant. It is related to the partitioning of co-surfactant in the two phases. If there is no partitioning of co-surfactant observed in the formulation (e.g., using icc-butanol as noted earlier) or no co-surfactant is present in the system, c )(A) or/(A) is zero (Salager et al. 2005 Acosta and Bhakta 2009) Cj-and aj-are temperature factors, equal to 0.06 and 0.01 K", respectively AT is temperature difference from 25°C and CC is called characteristic curvature of the surfactant. Like HLB, CC is also a measure of the hydrophUicity of surfactant. However, the CC scale is different from that of HLB (Acosta et al. 2008). The smaller the CC value, the more hydrophilic is the surfactant (e.g., the CC value of sodium oleate is -1.7 whereas oleic acid has a CC value of 0) (Acosta et al. 2008). [Pg.591]

It was determined, for example, that the surface tension of water relaxes to its equilibrium value with a relaxation time of 0.6 msec [104]. The oscillating jet method has been useful in studying the surface tension of surfactant solutions. Figure 11-21 illustrates the usual observation that at small times the jet appears to have the surface tension of pure water. The slowness in attaining the equilibrium value may partly be due to the times required for surfactant to diffuse to the surface and partly due to chemical rate processes at the interface. See Ref. 105 for similar studies with heptanoic acid and Ref. 106 for some anomalous effects. [Pg.34]

There are numerous references in the literature to irreversible adsorption from solution. Irreversible adsorption is defined as the lack of desotption from an adsoibed layer equilibrated with pure solvent. Often there is no evidence of strong surface-adsorbate bond formation, either in terms of the chemistry of the system or from direct calorimetric measurements of the heat of adsorption. It is also typical that if a better solvent is used, or a strongly competitive adsorbate, then desorption is rapid and complete. Adsorption irreversibility occurs quite frequently in polymers [4] and proteins [121-123] but has also been observed in small molecules and surfactants [124-128]. Each of these cases has a different explanation and discussion. [Pg.404]

Prior to about 1920, flotation procedures were rather crude and rested primarily on the observation that copper and lead-zinc ore pulps (crushed ore mixed with water) could be benefacted (improved in mineral content) by treatment with large amounts of fatty and oily materials. The mineral particles collected in the oily layer and thus could be separated from the gangue and the water. Since then, oil flotation has been largely replaced by froth or foam flotation. Here, only minor amounts of oil or surfactant are used and a froth is formed by agitating or bubbling air through the suspension. The oily froth or foam is concentrated in mineral particles and can be skimmed off as shown schematically in Fig. XIII-4. [Pg.472]

The traditional association colloid is of the M R" type where R" is the surfactant ion, studied in aqueous solution. Such salts also form micelles in nonaqueous and nonpolar solvents. These structures, termed inverse micelles, have the polar groups inward if some water is present [198] however, the presence of water may prevent the observation of a well-deflned CMC [198,199]. Very complex structures may be formed in nearly anhydrous media (see Ref. 200). [Pg.483]

Cationic surfactants may be used [94] and the effect of salinity and valence of electrolyte on charged systems has been investigated [95-98]. The phospholipid lecithin can also produce microemulsions when combined with an alcohol cosolvent [99]. Microemulsions formed with a double-tailed surfactant such as Aerosol OT (AOT) do not require a cosurfactant for stability (see, for instance. Refs. 100, 101). Morphological hysteresis has been observed in the inversion process and the formation of stable mixtures of microemulsion indicated [102]. [Pg.517]

While most vesicles are formed from double-tail amphiphiles such as lipids, they can also be made from some single chain fatty acids [73], surfactant-cosurfactant mixtures [71], and bola (two-headed) amphiphiles [74]. In addition to the more common spherical shells, tubular vesicles have been observed in DMPC-alcohol mixtures [70]. Polymerizable lipids allow photo- or chemical polymerization that can sometimes stabilize the vesicle [65] however, the structural change in the bilayer on polymerization can cause giant vesicles to bud into smaller shells [76]. Multivesicular liposomes are collections of hundreds of bilayer enclosed water-filled compartments that are suitable for localized drug delivery [77]. The structures of these water-in-water vesicles resemble those of foams (see Section XIV-7) with the polyhedral structure persisting down to molecular dimensions as shown in Fig. XV-11. [Pg.549]

FT-EPR spectra of the ZnTPPS/DQ system in a solution of cetyltriinethylaininonium chloride (CTAC), a cationic surfactant, are shown in figme BE 16.21. As in the TX100 solution, both donor and acceptor are associated with the micelles in the CTAC solution. The spectra of DQ at delays after the laser flash of less than 5 ps clearly show polarization from the SCRP mechanism. While SCRPs were too short-lived to be observed in TXlOO solution, they clearly have a long lifetime in this case. Van Willigen and co-workers... [Pg.1614]

Micellization is a second-order or continuous type phase transition. Therefore, one observes continuous changes over the course of micelle fonnation. Many experimental teclmiques are particularly well suited for examining properties of micelles and micellar solutions. Important micellar properties include micelle size and aggregation number, self-diffusion coefficient, molecular packing of surfactant in the micelle, extent of surfactant ionization and counterion binding affinity, micelle collision rates, and many others. [Pg.2581]

Additives, whether hydrophobic solutes, other surfactants or polymers, tend to nucleate micelles at concentrations lower than in the absence of additive. Due to this nucleating effect of polymers on micellization there is often a measurable erne, usually called a critical aggregation concentration or cac, below the regular erne observed in the absence of added polymer. This cac is usually independent of polymer concentration. The size of these aggregates is usually smaller than that of free micelles, and this size tends to be small even in the presence of added salt (conditions where free micelles tend to grow in size). [Pg.2603]

Breslow studied the dimerisation of cyclopentadiene and the reaction between substituted maleimides and 9-(hydroxymethyl)anthracene in alcohol-water mixtures. He successfully correlated the rate constant with the solubility of the starting materials for each Diels-Alder reaction. From these relations he estimated the change in solvent accessible surface between initial state and activated complex " . Again, Breslow completely neglects hydrogen bonding interactions, but since he only studied alcohol-water mixtures, the enforced hydrophobic interactions will dominate the behaviour. Recently, also Diels-Alder reactions in dilute salt solutions in aqueous ethanol have been studied and minor rate increases have been observed Lubineau has demonstrated that addition of sugars can induce an extra acceleration of the aqueous Diels-Alder reaction . Also the effect of surfactants on Diels-Alder reactions has been studied. This topic will be extensively reviewed in Chapter 4. [Pg.26]

One of the most important characteristics of micelles is their ability to take up all kinds of substances. Binding of these compounds to micelles is generally driven by hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. The dynamics of solubilisation into micelles are similar to those observed for entrance and exit of individual surfactant molecules. Their uptake into micelles is close to diffusion controlled, whereas the residence time depends on the sttucture of the molecule and the solubilisate, and is usually in the order of 10 to 10" seconds . Hence, these processes are fast on the NMR time scale. [Pg.127]

For ammonium surfactants there is evidence for the existence of an additional specific interaction between the headgroups of the surfactant and the aromatic solubilisate . This is in line with the observation that partition coefficients for benzene in CTAB solutions are much higher than those for... [Pg.129]

The kinetic data are essentially always treated using the pseudophase model, regarding the micellar solution as consisting of two separate phases. The simplest case of micellar catalysis applies to unimolecTilar reactions where the catalytic effect depends on the efficiency of bindirg of the reactant to the micelle (quantified by the partition coefficient, P) and the rate constant of the reaction in the micellar pseudophase (k ) and in the aqueous phase (k ). Menger and Portnoy have developed a model, treating micelles as enzyme-like particles, that allows the evaluation of all three parameters from the dependence of the observed rate constant on the concentration of surfactant". ... [Pg.129]

Studies of micellar catalysis of himolecular reactions of uncharged substrates have not been frequent" ". Dougherty and Berg performed a detailed analysis of the kinetics of the reaction of 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene with aniline in the presence of anionic and nonionic surfactants. Micelles induce increases in the apparent rate constant of this reaction. In contrast, the second-order rate constant for reaction in the micellar pseudophase was observed to be roughly equal to, or even lower than the rate constant in water. [Pg.131]

Herein [5.2]i is the total number of moles of 5.2 present in the reaction mixture, divided by the total reaction volume V is the observed pseudo-first-order rate constant Vmrji,s is an estimate of the molar volume of micellised surfactant S 1 and k , are the second-order rate constants in the aqueous phase and in the micellar pseudophase, respectively (see Figure 5.2) V is the volume of the aqueous phase and Psj is the partition coefficient of 5.2 over the micellar pseudophase and water, expressed as a ratio of concentrations. From the dependence of [5.2]j/lq,fe on the concentration of surfactant, Pj... [Pg.135]

The Diels-Alder reaction provides us with a tool to probe its local reaction environment in the form of its endo-exo product ratio. Actually, even a solvent polarity parameter has been based on endo-exo ratios of Diels-Alder reactions of methyl acrylate with cyclopentadiene (see also section 1.2.3). Analogously we have determined the endo-exo ratio of the reaction between 5.1c and 5.2 in surfactant solution and in a mimber of different organic and acpieous media. These ratios are obtained from the H-NMR of the product mixtures, as has been described in Chapter 2. The results are summarised in Table 5.3, and clearly point towards a water-like environment for the Diels-Alder reaction in the presence of micelles, which is in line with literature observations. [Pg.137]

In all surfactant solutions 5.2 can be expected to prefer the nonpolar micellar environment over the aqueous phase. Consequently, those surfactant/dienophile combinations where the dienophile resides primarily in the aqueous phase show inhibition. This is the case for 5.If and S.lg in C12E7 solution and for S.lg in CTAB solution. On the other hand, when diene, dienophile and copper ion simultaneously bind to the micelle, as is the case for Cu(DS)2 solutions with all three dienophiles, efficient micellar catalysis is observed. An intermediate situation exists for 5.1c in CTAB or C12E7 solutions and particularly for 5.If in CTAB solution. Now the dienophile binds to the micelle and is slid elded from the copper ions that apparently prefer the aqueous phase. Tliis results in an overall retardation, despite the possible locally increased concentration of 5.2 in the micelle. [Pg.142]

Studies on a large number of aromatic compounds have revealed that for CTAB the largest shift occurs for the alkyl chain protons near the surfactant headgroup, whereas in SDS nearly all proton signals are shifted significantly " ". For SDS, the most pronounced shifts are observed for protons around the centre of the chain. This result has been interpreted in terms of deeper penetration of... [Pg.145]

Figure 5.7k shows the shifts of the proton signals of C12E7 as induced by 5.1c. All parts of the surfactant experience an appreciable shift. The strongest shifts are observed near the interface between the alkyl chains and the ethyleneoxide part, suggesting that 5.1c prefers the interfacial region of the nonionic micelles. [Pg.146]

Assuming complete binding of the dienophile to the micelle and making use of the pseudophase model, an expression can be derived relating the observed pseudo-first-order rate constant koi . to the concentration of surfactant, [S]. Assumirg a negligible contribution of the reaction in the aqueous phase to the overall rate, the second-order rate constant in the micellar pseudophase lq is given by ... [Pg.156]

An alternative to this process is low (<10 N/m (10 dynes /cm)) tension polymer flooding where lower concentrations of surfactant are used compared to micellar polymer flooding. Chemical adsorption is reduced compared to micellar polymer flooding. Increases in oil production compared to waterflooding have been observed in laboratory tests. The physical chemistry of this process has been reviewed (247). Among the surfactants used in this process are alcohol propoxyethoxy sulfonates, the stmcture of which can be adjusted to the salinity of the injection water (248). [Pg.194]


See other pages where Surfactant observations is mentioned: [Pg.287]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.1744]    [Pg.2580]    [Pg.2589]    [Pg.2601]    [Pg.2743]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.175]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 ]




SEARCH



Surfactants in Solution Experimental Observations and Models

© 2024 chempedia.info