Surface rheology dilational viscosity

The rheological properties of a fluid interface may be characterized by four parameters surface shear viscosity and elasticity, and surface dilational viscosity and elasticity. When polymer monolayers are present at such interfaces, viscoelastic behavior has been observed (1,2), but theoretical progress has been slow. The adsorption of amphiphilic polymers at the interface in liquid emulsions stabilizes the particles mainly through osmotic pressure developed upon close approach. This has become known as steric stabilization (3,4.5). In this paper, the dynamic behavior of amphiphilic, hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl celluloses (HM-HEC), was studied. In previous studies HM-HEC s were found to greatly reduce liquid/liquid interfacial tensions even at very low polymer concentrations, and were extremely effective emulsifiers for organic liquids in water (6). 

Figure 24. A comparison of the data obtained from a range of surface rheological measurements of samples of /3-lg as a function of Tween 20 concentration. ( ), The surface diffusion coefficient of FITC-jS-lg (0.2 mg/ml) at the interfaces of a/w thin films (X), the surface shear viscosity of /3-lg (0.01 mg/ml) at the o/w interface after 5 hours adsorption ( ), the surface dilational elasticity and (o) the dilational loss modulus of /3-lg (0.2 mg/ml).

The surface rheological properties of the /3-lg/Tween 20 system at the macroscopic a/w interface were examined by a third method, namely surface dilation [40]. Sample data obtained are presented in Figure 24. The surface dilational modulus, (E) of a liquid is the ratio between the small change in surface tension (Ay) and the small change in surface area (AlnA). The surface dilational modulus is a complex quantity. The real part of the modulus is the storage modulus, e (often referred to as the surface dilational elasticity, Ed). The imaginary part is the loss modulus, e , which is related to the product of the surface dilational viscosity and the radial frequency ( jdu). 

E.H. Lucassen-Reynders, Surface Elasticity and Viscosity in Compression/ Dilation, in Anionic Surfactants Physical Chemistry and Surfactant Action E.H. Lucassen-Reynders, Ed., Marcel Dekker (1981). (Review of dllatlonal rheology mode, emphasis on Gibbs monolayers includes discussion on 2D equations of state.)... 

First of all, surface rheology is completely described by four rheological parameters elasticity and viscosity of compression/dilatation and of shear. In every case surface flow is coupled with the hydrodynamics of the adherent liquid bulk phase. From interfacial thermodynamics we know that the integration over the deviation of the tangential stress tensor from the bulk pressure represents the interfacial tension y (after Bakker 1928). 

The rheology of wet foams was analysed by Wasan et al. (1992) and a relation was derived (Edwards et al. 1991) connecting the foam dilational viscosity Kp to the surface dilational elasticity E ... 

We have confined ourselves to a description of the dynamics of surface roughness and the influence of the interaction forces on these dynamics. In reality, however, there are many more dynamic processes in the film and especially in the adsorbed monolayers that should be considered to describe in full detail the film dynamics. Apart from dynamics of the film surfaces parallel to the normal of the interfaces, motions of the adsorbed surface molecules in the interface must be considered. According to Lucas-sen-Reynders and Lucassen, the actual stresses in an interface are described by four rheological coefficients, reflecting the viscoelastic properties of the interface. Two of these, the surface dilatational elasticity and the surface dilatational viscosity, measure the surface s resistance against changes in area. The dilatational module e, considered before, expresses the dilatational elasticity. In our description of the film system, we neglected the viscous behavior of the interface, which implies that no diffusion of surface active molecules between bulk and interface was considered. If, however, surface-to-bulk diffusion is taken into account, the expression... 

Many experiments have been proposed for measuring the interfacial shear viscosity and elasticity and interfacial dilatational viscosity and elasticity at gas/liquid and liquid/ liquid interfaces [22]. Interfacial shear viscosities of different oil/aqueous systems have been studied worldwide. Some experimental results indicate that low interfacial shear viscosities do not necessarily imply that an emulsion will be unstable [23]. The dilatational rheology is based on area changes due to an expansion or compression of a fluid surface and stress relaxation experiments. The experiment results show that the interfacial dilatational properties can be much higher than the interfacial shear properties for the same system [15,24-27]. This makes researchers believe that interfacial dilatational viscosity and elasticity may have a better relationship with the stability of the emulsion than with interfacial shear properties. 

Rheology is the study of the deformation and flow of materials under the influence of an applied stress. The interfacial rheology of a surfactant film normally accounts for the interfacial viscosity and elasticity of the film. The interfacial viscosity can be classified with interfacial shear viscosity and interfacial dilational viscosity. Films are elastic if they resist deformation in the plane of the interface and if the surface tends to recover its natural shape when the deforming forces are removed. The interfacial elasticity can also be classified with interfacial shear elasticity and interfacial dilational elasticity (6, 7, 12). Malhotra and... 

Tirf, ) are normalized by their values at pH = 5. The experimental data show that both the surface elasticity, Ec, and relaxation time, increase with increase of pH. The interfacial dilatational viscosity, y d, exhibits a maximum at pH = 6. A similar peak of the interfacial shear viscosity of BSA at pH = 6 has been observed by Graham and Phillips [188] at petroleum ether—water interface. The results in Fig. 9 demonstrate a marked influence of the ionic strength on the rheological parameters. 

The main classic theory on the oscillatory rheology of dispersions of thin-walled capsules is due to Oldroyd [80]. In a latter paper, apart from the interfacial tension, Oldroyd introduced surface shear viscosity, surface shear elasticity, dilatational viscosity, and dilatational elasticity [33]. 

While dilatational rheology plays an important role in short-term stability of dispersions shear viscosity may contribute appreciably to the long-term stability (Murray and Dickinson, 1996 Murray, 1998, 2002). The shear characteristics of the interfacial film are governed by the composition and structure of the adsorbed material. In addition, surface shear viscosity is a very sensitive technique to analyze the competitive adsorption of protein and water-soluble LMWE at the air-water interface (Murray and Dickinson, 1996 Murray, 1998, 2002 Bos and van Vliet, 2001). 

With respect to the rheological parameters fliey come to the conclusion that surface elasticity effects are superior to surface viscosity effects. This, however, apphes to pure surfactant layers and may be different for pure protein or mixed surfactant/protein adsorption layers. It has been stressed also by Langevin (26), in her review on foams and emulsions, fliat studies on the dynamics of adsorption and dilational rheology studies for mixed systems, in particular surfactant-polymer systems, are desirable in order to understand these most common stabilizing systems. 

Keywords Capillary instability of liquid jets Curvature Elongational rheology Free liquid jets Linear stability theory Nonlinear theory Quasi-one-dimensional equations Reynolds number Rheologically complex liquids (pseudoplastic, dilatant, and viscoelastic polymeric liquids) Satellite drops Small perturbations Spatial instability Surface tension Swirl Temporal instability Thermocapillarity Viscosity... 

The components of the surface stress tensor depend upon the extent and the rate of surface deformation, in a relationship involving the resistance of the surface to both changes in area and shape. Either of these two types of resistance can be expressed in a modulus which combines an elastic with a viscous term. This leaves us with four formal rheological coefficients which suffice for a description of the surface stress. Two of these, viz., the surface dilatational elasticity, and viscosity, measure the surface resistance to changes in area, the other two, viz., the surface shear elasticity, e, and viscosity, r describe the... 

---