Dilational interfacial

Dilational interfacial properties can be determined in various ways both at small and at large strains. In the former case results are normally interpreted in terms of interfacial dilational storage moduli, interfacial dilational loss moduli or dynamic interfacial dilational viscosities and the loss tangents as a function of applied deformation frequency, see sec. 3.6f. For large strains one obtains the Interfacial dilational viscosity. Various techniques have been discussed In the reviews by Miller et al. and Prins, mentioned in sec. 3. lOd. For the wave behaviour, see fig. 3.45. 

A Prlns, Dynamic Surface Tension and Dilational Interfacial Properties, in New Physico-chemical Techniques for the Characterization of Complex Food Systems, E. Dickinson, Ed., Blackie Academic (1995), chapter 10. (Review of dynamic techniques.)... 

A. Prins. Dynamic Surface Tension and Dilational Interfacial Properties. In E. 

These subjects will be described explicitly in the subsequent chapters. It is evident that both the mechanical properties and the exchange of matter at interfaces are of general interest for an improved understanding of the foaming and emulsification processes. Experimental access to these properties of adsorption layers is given by relaxations experiments which provide simultaneously information about the exchange of matter and the dilational interfacial elasticity defined by... 

A study on a commonly used demulsifier, namely, a phenol-formaldehyde resin, elucidated how various parameters such as interfacial tension, interfacial shear viscosity, dynamic interfacial-tension gradient, dilatational elasticity, and demulsifier clustering affect the demulsification effectiveness [1275]. 

Effectiveness of a crude oil demulsifier is correlated with the lowering of shear viscosity and dynamic tension gradient of the oil-water interface. Using the pulsed drop technique, the interfacial dilational modulii with different demulsifiers have been measured. The interfacial tension relaxation occurs faster with an effective demulsifier. Electron spin resonance with labeled demulsifiers indicate that the demulsifiers form reverse micelle like clusters in bulk oil. The slow unclustering of the demulsifier at the interface appears to be the rate determining step in the tension relaxation process. 

Our goal is to develop a property-performance relationship for different types of demulsifiers. The important interfacial properties governing water-in-oil emulsion stability are shear viscosity, dynamic tension and dilational elasticity. We have studied the relative importance of these parameters in demulsification. In this paper, some of the results of our study are presented. In particular, we have found that to be effective, a demulsifier must lower the dynamic interfacial tension gradient and its ability to do so depends on the rate of unclustering of the ethylene oxide groups at the oil-water interface. 

The complex interfacial dilational modulus ( ) is a key fundamental property governing foam and emulsion stability. It is defined as the interfacial tension increment (da) per unit fractional interfacial area change (dA/A) i.e.,... 

For effective demulsification of a water-in-oil emulsion, both shear viscosity as well as dynamic tension gradient of the water-oil interface have to be lowered. The interfacial dilational modulus data indicate that the interfacial relaxation process occurs faster with an effective demulsifier. The electron spin resonance with labeled demulsifiers suggests that demulsifiers form clusters in the bulk oil. The unclustering and rearrangement of the demulsifier at the interface may affect the interfacial relaxation process. 

The rheological properties of a fluid interface may be characterized by four parameters surface shear viscosity and elasticity, and surface dilational viscosity and elasticity. When polymer monolayers are present at such interfaces, viscoelastic behavior has been observed (1,2), but theoretical progress has been slow. The adsorption of amphiphilic polymers at the interface in liquid emulsions stabilizes the particles mainly through osmotic pressure developed upon close approach. This has become known as steric stabilization (3,4.5). In this paper, the dynamic behavior of amphiphilic, hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl celluloses (HM-HEC), was studied. In previous studies HM-HEC s were found to greatly reduce liquid/liquid interfacial tensions even at very low polymer concentrations, and were extremely effective emulsifiers for organic liquids in water (6). 

Since there is no change in surface tension with a change in the rate of a pure liquid surface (i.e., d A/d II = infinity), the elasticity is zero. The interfacial dilational viscosity, ks, is defined as... 

Boussinesq (B4) proposed that the lack of internal circulation in bubbles and drops is due to an interfacial monolayer which acts as a viscous membrane. A constitutive equation involving two parameters, surface shear viscosity and surface dilational viscosity, in addition to surface tension, was proposed for the interface. This model, commonly called the Newtonian surface fluid model (W2), has been extended by Scriven (S3). Boussinesq obtained an exact solution to the creeping flow equations, analogous to the Hadamard-Rybczinski result but with surface viscosity included. The resulting terminal velocity is... 

Faergemand, M., Murray, B.S. (1998). Interfacial dilatational properties of milk proteins cross-linked by transglutaminase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46, 884-890. 

Wijmans, C.M., Dickinson, E. (1998). Simulation of interfacial shear and dilatational rheology of an adsorbed protein monolayer modeled as a network of spherical particles. Langmuir, 14, 7278-7286. 

To determine the adsorption kinetics, the effective age of the drop interface must be calculated. However, experimental data yield only interfacial tension values as a function of drop formation time. To determine the true age of the interface, both the fluid flow within the droplet and the dilation of the droplet interface must be interpreted using appropriate models. Miller et al. (1992) showed that the drop formation time, r op, can be converted into the effective age of the drop interface ... 

We can distinguish between two types of stresses on an interface a shear stress and a dilatational stress. In a shear stress experiment, the interfacial area is kept constant and a shear is imposed on the interface. The resistance is characterized by a shear viscosity, similar to the Newtonian viscosity of fluids. In a dilatational stress experiment, an interface is expanded (dilated) without shear. This resistance is characterized by a dilatational viscosity. In an actual dynamic situation, the total stress is a sum of these stresses, and both these viscosities represent the total flow resistance afforded by the interface to an applied stress. There are a number of instruments to study interfacial rheology and most of them are described in Ref. [1]. The most recent instrumentation is the controlled drop tensiometer. 

Unlike in three dimensions, where liquids are often considered incompressible, a surfactant monolayer can be expanded or compressed over a wide area range. Thus, the dynamic surface tension experienced during a rate-dependent surface expansion, is the result of the surface dilational viscosity, the surface shear viscosity, and elastic forces. Often, the contributions of shear and/or the dilational viscosities are neglected during stress measurements of surface expansions. Isolating interfacial viscosity effects is difficult because, since the interface is connected to the substrate on either side of it, the interfacial viscosity is coupled to the two bulk viscosities. 

---