Surface catalysis structure effects

In any case, it is interesting to note that catalytic efficacy has been observed with nano- or mesoporous gold sponges [99-101, 145] suggesting that neither a discrete particle nor an oxide support is actually a fundamental requirement for catalysis. An alternative mechanism invokes the nanoscale structural effect noted in Section 7.2.2, and proposes that the catalytic effect of nanoscale gold structures is simply due to the presence of a large proportion of lowly-coordinated surface atoms, which would have their own, local electronic configurations suitable for the reaction to be catalyzed [34, 49,146] A recent and readily available study by Hvolbaek et al. [4] summarizes the support for this alternate view. 

The combined use of the modem tools of surface science should allow one to understand many fundamental questions in catalysis, at least for metals. These tools afford the experimentalist with an abundance of information on surface structure, surface composition, surface electronic structure, reaction mechanism, and reaction rate parameters for elementary steps. In combination they yield direct information on the effects of surface structure and composition on heterogeneous reactivity or, more accurately, surface reactivity. Consequently, the origin of well-known effects in catalysis such as structure sensitivity, selective poisoning, ligand and ensemble effects in alloy catalysis, catalytic promotion, chemical specificity, volcano effects, to name just a few, should be subject to study via surface science. In addition, mechanistic and kinetic studies can yield information helpful in unraveling results obtained in flow reactors under greatly different operating conditions. 

It took some time to adopt a similar view of other heterogeneous elimination and substitution reactions. Most efficient experimental tools have been found in stereochemical studies, correlation of structure effects on rates and measurement of deuterium kinetic isotope effects. The usual kinetic studies were not of much help due to the complex nature of catalytic reactions and relatively large experimental error. The progress has been made possible also by the studies of surface acid—base properties of the solids and their meaning for catalysis (for a detailed treatment see ref. 5). 

All electrodes react with their environment via the surfaces in ways which will determine their electrochemical performance. Properly selected surface modification can effectively enhance the electrode heterogeneous catalysis property, especially selectivity and activity. The bulk materials can be chosen to provide mechanical, chemical, electrical, and structural integrity. In this part, several surface modification methods will be introduced in terms of metal film deposition, metal ion implantation, electrochemical activation, organic surface coating, nanoparticle deposition, glucose oxidase (GOx) enzyme-modified electrode, and DNA-modified electrode. 

Chemical heterogeneities present in soils, sediments, and aquifers undoubtedly have an effect on rates of pollutant degradation. Other sources of surface catalysis not discussed here include Bronsted acidity of surface sites, that become apparent as surfaces become dehydrated (El-Amamy and Mill, 1984). Surface and pore structure may play a role in the catalysis of phosmet hydrolysis by montmorillonite (Sanchez-Camazano and Sanchez-Martin, 1983) and in the catalysis of ethyl acetate hydrolysis by zeolites (Nam-ba et al., 1981). 

In this work OPCM was further modified for the preparation of highly dispersed fluorite-like oxide systems including Ce02, Ce-Zr-O solid solutions and partially stabilized zirconias. The aim of the work was to elucidate the effect of the samples composition and specificity of their preparation procedure on the bulk and surface defect structure, which is known to be of importance for catalysis of red-ox reactions. 

There is still much to do. Do we understand why the Mo(001) surface reconstruction involves a long period modulation (sect. 4.3.1) The dynamics of reconstruction is a vast field for the future, especially as this can he explored in the STM. There arc many problems to study in adsorption, the role of surface defects in adsorption, the effect of adsorption on surface structure, and the processes of surface chemistry so important in catalysis (see, for example. De Vita et al., 1993). And anyone who has ever done a surface electronic structure calculation knows that we are a long way from having the proverbial black box which can give us all the answers about a surface without a lot of hard w ork. 

In a practical sense the effects described in the foregoing discussion place a severe limitation on the applicability of spectral studies of adsorbed molecules to the detailed elucidation of the adsorption process and of the stereochemistry involved in surface catalysis. Since the absorption intensity may be either enhanced or decreased as a result of adsorption on a surface, and may either increase or decrease with variation in surface coverage, it becomes very difficult indeed to use spectral data as a measure of the surface concentration of adsorbed species. This is of particular importance when more than one species occupies the surface e.g., physisorbed and chemisorbed species. In this case the absolute concentration of either species on the surface cannot be measured directly nor can it be reliably inferred from a comparison of the intensity of the bands corresponding to these two species. Moreover, in the identification of an adsorbed species the relative intensities of two or more bands characteristic of that species e.g., the CH stretching and the CH deformation frequencies for adsorbed hydrocarbons, cannot be used as evidence for the structure of the adsorbed species since the absorption coefficients of the individual bands may change in opposite directions as a function of surface coverage. Thus the relative intensities of such bands cannot be compared to the relative intensities of the same bands observed in solution or in the gas phase. A similar difficulty arises when attempts are made to use the electronic spectra of adsorbed molecules to complement the infrared spectra for identification purposes. 

At this time it had become possible to determine experimentally total surface area and the distribution of sizes and total volume of pores. Wheeler set forth to provide the theoretical development of calculating the role of this pore structure in determining catalyst performance. In a very slow reaction, reactants can diffuse to the center of the catalyst pellet before they react. On the other hand, in the case of a very active catalyst containing small pores, a reactant molecule will react (due to collision with pore walls) before it can diffuse very deeply into the pore structure. Such a fast reaction for which diffusion is slower than reaction will use only the outer pore mouths of a catalyst pellet. An important result of the theory is that when diffusion is slower than reaction, all the important kinetic quantities such as activity, selectivity, temperature coefficient and kinetic reaction order become dependent on the pore size and pellet size with which a pellet is prepared. This is because pore size and pellet size determine the degree to which diffusion affects reaction rates. Wheeler saw that unlike many aspects of heterogeneous catalysis, the effects of pore structure on catalyst behavior can be put on quite a rigorous basis, making predictions from theory relatively accurate and reliable. 

The size of the zeoKte crystals determines the role of the external surface and the relative importance of diffusion-based shape selectivity in catalysis. So, the external surface of zeoKte Beta, often in the form of nanosized crystallites, is crucial for catalysis. Some topologies like MWW (MCM-22) show structural features that result in the formation of typical half-cages at the external surface. Such confinement effects for molecules can also be the result of delamination of specific structures, viz. ITQ-2 [20]. 

Two important points are worth re-emphasizing here. In order for a strain placed in a substrate to facilitate a chemical reaction, that strain must be along the reaction coordinate. The strain must push the reactant toward the transition state on the energy surface, either structurally or electronically. Also, the strain must be partly or fully relieved upon achieving the transition state. A strain put into a reactant that remains in the transition state will not have any effect on the rate of the reaction (recall the discussion of Figure 9.2 C, where no catalysis is obtained). 

By controlling the shape to have particular facets, the atomic arrangement can be modulated, which can potentially allow for enhancements in activity and selectivity. Knowledge of the effect of the surface aystalline structure on catalytic properties has been increasing for decades, which can be used to design the catalysts at nanometer scale with higher activity and selectivity. Recent review papers about shape-controlled nanoparticles and their catalysis can be also found elsewhere [7-12]. 

It is important to distinguish clearly between the surface area of a decomposing solid [i.e. aggregate external boundaries of both reactant and product(s)] measured by adsorption methods and the effective area of the active reaction interface which, in most systems, is an internal structure. The area of the contact zone is of fundamental significance in kinetic studies since its determination would allow the Arrhenius pre-exponential term to be expressed in dimensions of area"1 (as in catalysis). This parameter is, however, inaccessible to direct measurement. Estimates from microscopy cannot identify all those regions which participate in reaction or ascertain the effective roughness factor of observed interfaces. Preferential dissolution of either reactant or product in a suitable solvent prior to area measurement may result in sintering [286]. The problems of identify-... 

Transition state theory, 46,208 Transmission factor, 42,44-46,45 Triosephosphate isomerase, 210 Trypsin, 170. See also Trypsin enzyme family active site of, 181 activity of, steric effects on, 210 potential surfaces for, 180 Ser 195-His 57 proton transfer in, 146, 147 specificity of, 171 transition state of, 226 Trypsin enzyme family, catalysis of amide hydrolysis, 170-171. See also Chymotrypsin Elastase Thrombin Trypsin Plasmin Tryptophan, structure of, 110... 

---