Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Supercritical fluid advantages

Many of the same properties that make supercritical fluids advantageous in chromatography also enhance their ability to extract compounds from within a sample matrix.(4) Also, since the solubility of most compounds is dependent on the density of the supercritical fluid, selective extraction is possible. (J5) These properties are well known, and have been exploited in some cases where the extraction was formerly done with a liquid. In many cases, the quality of extract is higher, and extractions are of higher efficiency than with liquids. Supercritical fluids, especially CO, are also often less expensive, less toxic and less flammable than their organic liquid phase counterparts. [Pg.190]

Supercritical Extraction. The use of a supercritical fluid such as carbon dioxide as extractant is growing in industrial importance, particularly in the food-related industries. The advantages of supercritical fluids (qv) as extractants include favorable solubiHty and transport properties, and the abiHty to complete an extraction rapidly at moderate temperature. Whereas most of the supercritical extraction processes are soHd—Hquid extractions, some Hquid—Hquid extractions are of commercial interest also. For example, the removal of ethanol from dilute aqueous solutions using Hquid carbon dioxide... [Pg.70]

Supercritical Fluid Extraction. Supercritical fluid (SCF) extraction is a process in which elevated pressure and temperature conditions are used to make a substance exceed a critical point. Once above this critical point, the gas (CO2 is commonly used) exhibits unique solvating properties. The advantages of SCF extraction in foods are that there is no solvent residue in the extracted products, the process can be performed at low temperature, oxygen is excluded, and there is minimal protein degradation (49). One area in which SCF extraction of Hpids from meats maybe appHed is in the production of low fat dried meat ingredients for further processed items. Its apphcation in fresh meat is less successful because the fresh meat contains relatively high levels of moisture (50). [Pg.34]

The use of separation techniques, such as gel permeation and high pressure Hquid chromatography interfaced with sensitive, silicon-specific aas or ICP detectors, has been particularly advantageous for the analysis of siUcones in environmental extracts (469,483—486). Supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with various detection devices is effective for the separation of siUcone oligomers that have molecular weights less than 3000 Da. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-sims) is appHcable up to 10,000 Da (487). [Pg.60]

Other. Numerous other supercritical fluid processes and techniques have been and are continuing to be developed. The novel spray appHcation UNICARB uses supercritical CO2 to replace volatile diluents in coating formulations, thereby reducing the volatile organic compound emissions by up to 80% (128). Rapid expansion of CO2 iu the spray can also improve the quaUty of coatings, thus performance benefits are obtained in a process developed for environmental advantages. [Pg.229]

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography. Supercritical fluid chromatography (sfc) combines the advantages of gc and hplc in that it allows the use of gc-type detectors when supercritical fluids are used instead of the solvents normally used in hplc. Carbon dioxide, -petane, and ammonia are common supercritical fluids (qv). For example, carbon dioxide (qv) employed at 7.38 MPa (72.9 atm) and 31.3°C has a density of 448 g/mL. [Pg.247]

T. A. Berger, Practical advantages of packed column supercritical fluid chromatography in supporting combinations chemistiy , in Unified Chromatography, J. P. Parcher and T. L. Chester (Eds), ACS Symposium Series 748, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 203-233 (2000). [Pg.168]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has been extensively used for the extraction of volatile components such as essential oils, flavours and aromas from plant materials on an industrial as well as an analytical scale (61). The extract thus obtained is usually analysed by GC. Off-line SFE-GC is frequently employed, but on-line SEE-GC has also been used. The direct coupling of SEE with supercritical fluid chromatography (SEC) has also been successfully caried out. Coupling SEE with SEC provides several advantages for the separation and detection of organic substances low temperatures can be used for both SEE and SEC, so they are well suited for the analysis of natural materials that contain compounds which are temperature-sensitive, such as flavours and fragrances. [Pg.241]

An on-line supercritical fluid chromatography-capillary gas chromatography (SFC-GC) technique has been demonstrated for the direct transfer of SFC fractions from a packed column SFC system to a GC system. This technique has been applied in the analysis of industrial samples such as aviation fuel (24). This type of coupled technique is sometimes more advantageous than the traditional LC-GC coupled technique since SFC is compatible with GC, because most supercritical fluids decompress into gases at GC conditions and are not detected by flame-ionization detection. The use of solvent evaporation techniques are not necessary. SFC, in the same way as LC, can be used to preseparate a sample into classes of compounds where the individual components can then be analyzed and quantified by GC. The supercritical fluid sample effluent is decompressed through a restrictor directly into a capillary GC injection port. In addition, this technique allows selective or multi-step heart-cutting of various sample peaks as they elute from the supercritical fluid... [Pg.325]

Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) refers to the use of mobile phases at temperatures and pressures above the critical point (supercritical) or just below (sub-critical). SFC shows several features that can be advantageous for its application to large-scale separations [132-135]. One of the most interesting properties of this technique is the low viscosity of the solvents used that, combined with high diffusion coefficients for solutes, leads to a higher efficiency and a shorter analysis time than in HPLC. [Pg.12]

A third motivation for studying gas solubilities in ILs is the potential to use compressed gases or supercritical fluids to separate species from an IL mixture. As an example, we have shown that it is possible to recover a wide variety of solutes from ILs by supercritical CO2 extraction [9]. An advantage of this technology is that the solutes can be removed quantitatively without any cross-contamination of the CO2 with the IL. Such separations should be possible with a wide variety of other compressed gases, such as C2LL6, C2LL4, and SF. Clearly, the phase behavior of the gas in question with the IL is important for this application. [Pg.82]

Supercritical fluid extraction — During the past two decades, important progress was registered in the extraction of bioactive phytochemicals from plant or food matrices. Most of the work in this area focused on non-polar compounds (terpenoid flavors, hydrocarbons, carotenes) where a supercritical (SFE) method with CO2 offered high extraction efficiencies. Co-solvent systems combining CO2 with one or more modifiers extended the utility of the SFE-CO2 system to polar and even ionic compounds, e.g., supercritical water to extract polar compounds. This last technique claims the additional advantage of combining extraction and destruction of contaminants via the supercritical water oxidation process."... [Pg.310]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a technique in which a supercritical fluid [formed when the critical temperature Tf) and critical pressure Pf) for the fluid are exceeded simultaneously] is used as an extraction solvent instead of an organic solvent. By far the most common choice of a supercritical fluid is carbon dioxide (CO2) because CO2 has a low critical temperature (re = 31.1 °C), is inexpensive, and is safe." SFE has the advantage of lower viscosity and improved diffusion coefficients relative to traditional organic solvents. Also, if supercritical CO2 is used as the extraction solvent, the solvent (CO2) can easily be removed by bringing the extract to atmospheric pressure. Supercritical CO2 itself is a very nonpolar solvent that may not have broad applicability as an extraction solvent. To overcome this problem, modifiers such as methanol can be used to increase the polarity of the SFE extraction solvent. Another problem associated with SFE using CO2 is the co-extraction of lipids and other nonpolar interferents. To overcome this problem, a combination of SFE with SPE can be used. Stolker et al." provided a review of several SFE/SPE methods described in the literature. [Pg.306]

A powerful advantage of SFC is that more detectors can be interfaced with SFC than with any other chromatographic technique (Table 4.30). There are only a few detectors which operate under supercritical conditions. Consequently, as the sample is transferred from the chromatograph to the detector, it must undergo a phase change from a supercritical fluid to a liquid or gas before detection. Most detectors can be made compatible with both cSFC and pSFC if flow and pressure limits are taken into account appropriately. GC-based detectors such as FID and LC-based detectors such as UVD are the most commonly used, but the detection limits of both still need to be improved to reach sensitivity for SFC compatible with that in LC and GC. Commercial cSFC-FID became available in... [Pg.210]

On-line SFE-SFC modes present several distinct advantages that are beyond reach of either technique when used separately (Table 7.13). An obvious advantage of SFE is that it is an ideal way to introduce a sample into an SFC system. Because the injection-solvent is the same as the mobile phase, in this respect the criteria for a successful coupling of different techniques are fulfilled [94], i.e. the output characteristics from the first instrument and the input characteristics of the second instrument are compatible. Supercritical fluid techniques can separate high-MW compounds are significantly faster than classical Soxhlet extractions and require less heat and solvent. SFE-SFC techniques are versatile,... [Pg.440]


See other pages where Supercritical fluid advantages is mentioned: [Pg.187]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.2000]    [Pg.2000]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.435]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.916]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.550]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.136 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.70 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.276 , Pg.344 , Pg.463 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.136 ]




SEARCH



ADVANTAGES OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS

Advantages of using supercritical fluids

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography advantages

Supercritical fluid extraction advantages

Supercritical fluid extraction advantages over conventional

Supercritical fluid solvents advantages

© 2024 chempedia.info