Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Supercritical fluid extraction instrumentation

Supercritical fluid extraction can be performed effectively with very simple systems. Figure 5 displays the basic components of an effective analytical SFE device. There are relatively few commercial suppliers of dedicated supercritical fluid extraction instrumentation. Table 7 shows the companies that promote SFE instrumentation as of the writing of this chapter. Some of the more traditional instrument manufacturers such as Hewlett-Packard (7680T SFE), Dionex (SFE 723), and Supelco (SFE-400) have discontinued their SFE lines. Dionex has invested quite heavily into high-temperature/high-pressure solvent extraction devices, and this will be described in the next section. For most purposes, inexpensive and efficient extraction units can be assembled using the basic components shown in Figure 5. [Pg.184]

The instrumental requirements for supercritical fluid extraction are quite simple. A pump is essential to generate the extraction pressure in a themostated extraction vessel. The soluble sample components are then swept from the vessel through a flow restrictor into a collection device that is normally at ambient pressure. The fluid used for supercritical fluid... [Pg.409]

Principles and Characteristics In an attempt to develop a unified sample preparation system for extraction of various matrix/analyte combinations Ashraf-Khorassani et al. [498] have described a hybrid supercritical fluid extraction/enhanced solvent extraction (SFE/ESE ) system to remove both polar and nonpolar analytes from various matrices. The idea is that a single instrument that can perform extractions via pure C02 solvent, and all gradients thereof affords... [Pg.123]

Snyder JL, Grob RL, McNally ME, OostdykTS.The effect of instrumental parameters and soil matrix on the recovery of organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides from soils using supercritical fluid extraction. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1993 31 183-191. [Pg.268]

On-line supercritical fluid extraction/GC methods combine the ability of liquid solvent extraction to extract efficiently a broad range of analytes with the ability of gas-phase extraction methods to rapidly and efficiently transfer the extracted analytes to the gas chromatograph. The characteristics of supercritical fluids make them ideal for the development of on-line sample extraction/gas chromatographic (SFE-GQ techniques. SFE has the ability to extract many analytes from a variety of matrices with recoveries that rival liquid solvent extraction, but with much shorter extraction times. Additionally, since most supercritical fluids are converted to the gas phase upon depressurization to ambient conditions, SFE has the potential to introduce extracted analytes to the GC in the gas phase. As shown in Fig. 13.8, the required instrumentation to perform direct coupling SFE-GC includes suitable transfer lines and a conventional gas chromatograph [162,163]. [Pg.595]

The introduction of commercial instrumentation in this automated area has been too slow and too disappointing to meet the need for routine analysis of numerous samples. The options have been the extraction of one sample at a time or individual samples in parallel. Either of these options make the repetitive analysis of the same sample or the sequential analysis of different samples exceptionally time consuming. Parallel analysis, proposed by one manufacturer, is susceptible to cross-contamination and across the board sample loss with clogging of one extraction vessel. In order to move supercritical fluid extraction into the realm of routine operations for residue analysis, rapid analysis of multiple samples needed to be addressed. [Pg.148]

Details of the instrumental design as well as results obtained using it are included in this report. The challenge is for instrument manufacturers to examine the features and produce equivalent instrumentation on a commercial basis. Only with this rapid, multiple sample analysis will the technique of supercritical fluid extraction be exploited to full advantage. [Pg.148]

We have designed and constructed two instruments that will allow supercritical fluid extraction from plants and soils with modifiers. Other uses, remain to be investigated. These multi-vessel extractors have demonstrated fast and efficient recovery data from a large num-... [Pg.166]

Of all the materials available for use as a supercritical fluid, CO2 has become the material of choice because of its chemical properties. Instruments have been developed to utilize the principles described to effect extractions of compounds from a variety of sample matrices including asphalt, plant material, and soils (Figure 25.1). The supercritical fluid is pumped through the sample, through a filter or column to a trap where the fluid vaporizes and solvent is added to transfer the analyses to a vial for analysis. More recent instruments combine the supercritical fluid extraction system with a variety of columns and detectors to acquire data from complex samples. [Pg.448]

In general, supercritical fluid extractions can be performed in either an on-line extraction mode or an off-line extraction mode. Off-line supercritical fluid extraction is the most common mode and involves extracting the analytes from the matrix and collecting them in either a sorbent trap or a collection solvent [11]. Following the collection step, the analytes are determined on a separate instrument (for example, on a chromatograph or an infrared spectrometer). In the on-line supercritical fluid extraction experiment, the outlet of the supercritical fluid extraction system is connected to a second analytical... [Pg.89]

Comparison of simple methanol extraction, Soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) shows (Clausen et al., 2003) that DEHP can be extracted relatively easily from dust and that the effectiveness does not differ significantly between the different extraction methods (see Figure 2.4). Selection of the optimal method depends on several circumstances, for example number of extraction cycles, instrument accessibility and the analysis method. However, PLE using cyclohexane/acetone was chosen as the preferred extraction method in the field study. [Pg.30]

This chapter covers techniques for the extraction of semivolatile organics from solid matrices. The focus is on commonly used and commercially available techniques, which include Soxhlet extraction, automated Soxhlet extraction, ultrasonic extraction, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). The underlying principles, instrumentation, operational procedures, and selected applications of these techniques are described. In a given application, probably all the methods mentioned above will work, so it often boils down to identifying the most suitable one. Consequently, an effort is made to compare these methodologies. [Pg.139]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) utilizes the unique properties of supercritical fluids to facilitate the extraction of organics from solid samples. Analytical scale SFE can be configured to operate on- or off-line. In the online configuration, SFE is coupled directly to an analytical instrument, such as a gas chromatograph, SFC, or high-performance liquid chromatograph. This offers the potential for automation, but the extract is limited to analysis by the dedicated instrument. Off-line SFE, as its name implies, is a stand-alone extraction method independent of the analytical technique to be used. Off-line SFE is more flexible and easier to perform than the online methods. It allows the analyst to focus on the extraction per se, and the extract is available for analysis by different methods. This chapter focuses on off-line SFE. [Pg.148]

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) has been used for the recovery of analytes from hair this is a technique that offers several advantages due to the characteristics of low viscosity of supercritical fluid the speed of extraction, high extraction efficiency, and ultimately the ability to easily remove the extraction solvent. Also there is the possibility of working with automated systems that also allow the recycling of the solvent. The major limitation of this technique is the cost of the instrumentation [42],... [Pg.386]

In the next section, we will give an overview of the instrumentation generally used to carry out analytical-scale supercritical fluid extraction. [Pg.435]

Finally, although it is not rigorously part of supercritical fluid extraction, a last step generally afforded hy analytical-scale supercritical fluid extractors is reconstitution of the extracted components in a solution that is appropriate for the subsequent analytical instrument. In the case of gravimetric assays, the net loss of sample weight or the net weight of extract components can be measured and reconstitution of extracted components is not necessarily employed. [Pg.436]

To appreciate the instrumental requirements for supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). [Pg.109]

In this introductory book chapter, several modem extraction techniques will be described, including supercritical fluid extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, pressurized hot Avater extraction, microwave assisted extraction, membrane-assisted solvent extraction, solid phase micro extraction and stir-bar sorptive extraction. These are techniques that meet many of today s requirements in terms of environmental sustainability, speed and automation. Basic principles of operation as well as method optimization will be discussed and compared for the different techniques. Both analytical and industrial applications will be discussed, together with commercial instruments available on the market. Key references will be given, and conclusions regarding applicability of the different techniques with respect to sample e, target-molecules and analytical vs. large-scale applications. [Pg.10]

Off-line supercritical fluid extraction, ultrasonic supercritical fluid extraction, and on-line supercritical fluid extraction-gas chromatography methodologies that have been developed specifically for analytical sample preparation and analysis are described. These methods offer the potential for extraction rate increases of over an order of magnitude, and are compatible with online analysis which provides the basis for automated sample preparation and analysis. These methods are particularly useful for small sample sizes or trace levels of analytes, and have been demonstrated to operate quantitatively. Combined ultrasonic supercritical fluid extraction can further enhance extraction rates from macro-porous materials by inducing convection through internal pores. The apparatus and instrumentation are described in detail and several examples are presented illustrating the applicability of these methodologies. [Pg.44]


See other pages where Supercritical fluid extraction instrumentation is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.908]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.3571]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.856]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.120 ]




SEARCH



Extractants supercritical fluid

Fluid extraction

Instrumentation extraction

Instrumentation, supercritical fluid

Supercritical extractants

Supercritical extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction fluids

© 2024 chempedia.info