Substrate Starting Material Concentrations

When the medium is changed, the Km values will change also. An important contribution to this change has nothing to do with the enzyme directly, but reflects 

Often experiments to screen different solvents will keep the same substrate concentration in each. Hence, if a solvent in which the substrate is more soluble is tested, the Km value will be increased, and the reaction rate may fall, as the enzyme is more limited by the availability of substrate. 

For preparative syntheses, good general advice is to use a saturated solution of the substrate(s) in any solvent tested. This will only be a poor choice in the relatively rare cases of substrate inhibition. It will certainly be a good policy to allow identification of any direct effects of the solvent. An obvious way to ensure that the medium is saturated with substrates is to include excess in the form of solid particles. This leads 

---

It has been seen from the above simple examples that the concentration of the substrate has a profound effect on the rate of the electrode process. It must be remembered, however, that the process may show different reaction orders in the different potential regions of the i-E curve. Thus, electron transfer is commonly the slow step in the Tafel region and diffusion control in the plateau region and these processes may have different reaction orders. Even at one potential the reaction order may vary with the substrate concentration as, for example, in the case discussed above where the electrode reaction requires adsorption of the starting material. 

Moreover, the product of an electrode process may also vary with the substrate concentration. In particular, this occurs when the reactive intermediate can further react by either a first-order or a higher-order chemical process or when the intermediate is able to react with molecules of the starting material. Examples of the latter type of reaction are... 

The influence of hydrogen pressure, substrate and catalyst concentration has briefly been mentioned. The reaction rate is dependent upon the catalyst concentration and hydrogen pressure, but appears to be independent of substrate concentration. The mechanism is proposed to involve the activation of the parent [Pd(allyl)] species producing an unstable hydrido-Pd(II) species (71), ensued by a fast reaction with the diene to restore the [Pd(allyl)] moiety (72) (Scheme 14.21). The observation that most of the starting material is isolated after the reaction suggests that only a small portion of the catalyst is active under the reaction conditions. Although a complete selectivity for the monoene is observed (even after full conversion), the presence of catalytically active colloidal palladium has not been completely excluded. 

Straightforward. We have therefore employed XAD-4 to combine biocatalytic synthesis with simultaneous product extraction. The system (Figure 15.8) comprises a continuously stirred tank reactor, a starting material feed pump, a product recovery loop with a (semi-) fluidized bed of XAD-4, and a pump to circulate the entire reaction mixture through the loop." ° Preliminary studies indicated that XAD-4 had no detrimental effects on E. coli JMlOl (pHBP461), hence, separation of biomass and reaction liquid prior to catechol extraction was not required. The biocatalytic reaction was carried out at very low concentrations of the toxic substrate and product. This was achieved by feeding the substrate at a rate lower than the potential bioconversion rate in the reactor. 

Ulijn et al. identified an enzyme, capable of enantioselectively reducing the ketone, from their extensive collection of ADH variants further modification of the hit resulted in a biocatalyst that produces the desired (5)-alcohol in >99.9% ee at concentrations of 100 gL in a sofid-to-sofid biotransformation, where both starting material and product display only sparing solubility in the reaction medium. High conversions (>99%) are achieved by the substrate-coupled method, using 50 % v/v isopropyl alcohol concentrations to drive the reaction by continuous acetone removal (Scheme 1.55). The product can be easily isolated by filtration and washing. 

In most of the cases studied bimolecular kinetics are followed, the rate constants of product formation depending on the rate of light absorption and on nucleophile concentration. Triplet lifetimes (as determined from quenching studies) also depend on nucleophile concentration. This means that the excited state is quenched by the nucleophile, accompanied by either product formation or reversal to starting material. In view of the inherently different triplet lifetimes of different substrates, it is highly desirable to rely on rate constants rather than... 

A lifetime of 27 ns at room temperature (in the absence of quencher, but in the presence of 0.025 M OH ) has been calculated from a linear Stem-Volraer plot using 9-fluorenone as quencher i >. In general, lifetimes of excited substrates are dependent on the nucleophile concentration. Quenching of the excited state by the nucleophile probably takes place by either formation of a a-complex or simply return to ground state starting material. 

The catalytic principle of micelles as depicted in Fig. 6.2, is based on the ability to solubilize hydrophobic compounds in the miceUar interior so the micelles can act as reaction vessels on a nanometer scale, as so-called nanoreactors [14, 15]. The catalytic complex is also solubihzed in the hydrophobic part of the micellar core or even bound to it Thus, the substrate (S) and the catalyst (C) are enclosed in an appropriate environment In contrast to biphasic catalysis no transport of the organic starting material to the active catalyst species is necessary and therefore no transport limitation of the reaction wiU be observed. As a consequence, the conversion of very hydrophobic substrates in pure water is feasible and aU the advantages mentioned above, which are associated with the use of water as medium, are given. Often there is an even higher reaction rate observed in miceUar catalysis than in conventional monophasic catalytic systems because of the smaller reaction volume of the miceUar reactor and the higher reactant concentration, respectively. This enhanced reactivity of encapsulated substrates is generally described as micellar catalysis [16, 17]. Due to the similarity to enzyme catalysis, micelle and enzyme catalysis have sometimes been correlated in literature [18]. 

The rate of a nitration is fastest at the start of a reaction when a large excess of nitric acid is present. As the reaction progresses the water formed during nitration dilutes the mixed acid and slows the rate of reaction, and as such, it is common towards the end of a nitration, when most of the substrate has reacted, to heat the reaction to completion. This dilution of the acid with water is an important point and the amount of sulfuric acid used should be enough to take up all the water formed during the reaction otherwise, nitration may be incomplete and result in an unfavourable mixture of product and starting material. Increased amounts of water in mixed acid rapidly reduce the concentration of nitronium ions. When concentrated nitric acid is used for the nitration of some of the more reactive substrates a large excess of sulfuric is often used to compensate for the water present. 

A major advantage of this higher order is that it makes the system very sensitive to changes in substrate concentration. If the first reaction in the sequence responds to the fourth power of the concentration of its substrate (the starting material for the sequence), the flow of material into the sequence is much more sensitive to small changes in the concentration of the starting material than if the reaction were first order. This will help to maintain the steady state of the system. 

If the ft proton is slightly less acidic than required for the (E1)anlon mechanism and k j is comparable to k1 but k2 is still small, the anion forms from the starting material in a rapid equilibrium and the leaving group departs in a subsequent slow step. This is called the (E1cB)b ( R for reversible ) mechanism. Because k2 is much smaller than kx and k 1, we can assume that k2 does not affect the equilibrium concentration of the anion of the substrate, S then... 

Representative procedure. To a solution of Sml2 in THF (5 mmol) and HMPA (300 pi) at — 78 °C was added the lactone substrate (lmmol) and the terpene ketone (2 mmol) in THF and the reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature. When TLC showed that the lactone starting material had been consumed, aqueous saturated NaHC03 and ethyl acetate were added and the resulting mixture stirred for 30 min. After filtration through Celite and concentration in vacuo, the crude product was purified by column chromatography. 

We have told you what sorts of starting materials and conditions favour El or E2 reactions, but we haven t told you how we know this. El and E2 differ in the order of their rate equations with respect to th.e base, so one way of finding out if a reaction is El or E 2 is to plot a graph of the variation of rate with base concentration. But this can be difficult with El reactions because the base (which need be only very weak) is usually the solvent. More detailed evidence for the differences between reaction mechanisms comes from studying the rates of elimination in substrates that differ only in that one or more of the protons have been replaced by deuterium atoms. These differences are known as kinetic isotope effects. 

---