Catalysts active species

So far, our laboratories have primarily focused on the development, testing, and implementation of ccCA, but early success has been obtained in utilizing ccCA to solve chemical problems. For instance, a prototype version of ccCA was used by our group in collaboration with the experimental group of Professor T. Brent Gunnoe (then of North Carolina State University) to compute bond-dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) of ethylene, formaldehyde, methylene imine, carbodiimide, isocyanide, and their hydrogenated counterparts in order to probe useful correlations between the free BDEs of these model substrates and the proclivity of their insertion into the Ru(II)-phenyl bond of a catalyst-active species [108]. The BDEs of these small model systems provided a useful diagnostic to explain the thermochemical preferences of certain types of bond insertions. 

Figure 20 Initial equilibria forming the catalyst active species (P = PPhs or TPPTS).

Fig. 8 Stabilization of the Akermark catalyst active species before (left) and after (right) intramolecular proton transfer.

Ring-opening polymerizations are catalyzed by a wide variety of substances, including the bases OH and RO and the acids H and BF3 water is also used as a catalyst. The reactions proceed by the opening of the ring by the catalyst to form an active species. 

Once the polymerization has been initiated by the addition of a catalyst to the monomer, propagation occurs by the entry of successive monomers between the ions of the active species ... 

The most important appHcation of metal alkoxides in reactions of the Friedel-Crafts type is that of aluminum phenoxide as a catalyst in phenol alkylation (205). Phenol is sufficientiy acidic to react with aluminum with the formation of (CgH O)2Al. Aluminum phenoxide, when dissolved in phenol, greatiy increases the acidic strength. It is beheved that, similar to alkoxoacids (206) an aluminum phenoxoacid is formed, which is a strong conjugate acid of the type HAl(OCgH )4. This acid is then the catalyticaHy active species (see Alkoxides, metal). 

Another group of isoprene polymerization catalysts is based on alanes and TiCl. In place of alkyl aluminum, derivatives of AlH (alanes) are used and react with TiCl to produce an active catalyst for the polymerization of isoprene. These systems are unique because no organometaHic compound is involved in producing the active species from TiCl. The substituted alanes are generally complexed with donor molecules of the Lewis base type, and they are Hquids or soHds that are soluble in aromatic solvents. The performance of catalysts prepared from AlHCl20(C2H )2 with TiCl has been reported (101). 

Rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation has been studied extensively (16—29). The most active catalyst source is hydridocarbonyltris(triphenylphosphine)rhodium, HRhCO[P(CgH )2]3 (30). However, a molecule of triphenylphosphine is presumed to dissociate to form the active species (21,28). Eurther dissociation could occur as shown ia equation 3. 

CatalyticaHy Active Species. The most common catalyticaHy active materials are metals, metal oxides, and metal sulfides. OccasionaHy, these are used in pure form examples are Raney nickel, used for fat hydrogenation, and y-Al O, used for ethanol dehydration. More often the catalyticaHy active component is highly dispersed on the surface of a support and may constitute no more than about 1% of the total catalyst. The main reason for dispersing the catalytic species is the expense. The expensive material must be accessible to reactants, and this requires that most of the catalytic material be present at a surface. This is possible only if the material is dispersed as minute particles, as smaH as 1 nm in diameter and even less. It is not practical to use minute... 

The catalysts are prepared by impregnating the support with aqueous salts of molybdenum and the promoter. In acidic solutions, molybdate ions are present largely in the form of heptamers, [Mo2024] , and the resulting surface species are beHeved to be present in islands, perhaps containing only seven Mo ions (100). Before use, the catalyst is treated with H2 and some sulfur-containing compounds, and the surface oxides are converted into the sulfides that are the catalyticaHy active species. 

The most widely used exhaust control device consists of a ceramic monolith with a thin-waHed open honeycomb stmcture. The accessible surface of this monolith system is iacreased by applyiag a separate coatiag, a wash coat, of a high surface area material such as gamma-alumiaa with the catalyticaHy active species impregaated iato this washcoat. The catalyst aeeds to oxidize hydrocarboas, coavert CO to CO2, and reduce NO. The whole system forms a catalytic converter that, suitably encased, is placed between the engine and the muffler/silencer unit. 

Under polymerisation conditions, the active center of the transition-metal haHde is reduced to a lower valence state, ultimately to which is unable to polymerise monomers other than ethylene. The ratio /V +, in particular, under reactor conditions is the determining factor for catalyst activity to produce EPM and EPDM species. This ratio /V + can be upgraded by adding to the reaction mixture a promoter, which causes oxidation of to Examples of promoters in the eadier Hterature were carbon tetrachloride, hexachlorocyclopentadiene, trichloroacetic ester, and hensotrichloride (8). Later, butyl perchlorocrotonate and other proprietary compounds were introduced (9,10). 

It would be expected that the stabilization of the adsorbed species by an extended conjugated system should increase with the number of aromatic rings in the adsorbed azahydrocarbon. However, data suitable for comparison are available only for phenanthridine, benzo-[/]quinoline, and benzo[h] quinoline. The large difference in the yields of biaryl obtained from the last two bases could be caused by steric interaction of the 7,8-benz-ring with the catalyst, which would lower the concentration of the adsorbed species relative to that with benzo[/]quinoline. The failure of phenanthridine to yield any biaryl is also noteworthy since some 5,6-dihydrophenanthridine was formed. This suggests that adsorption on the catalyst via the nitrogen atom is possible, but that steric inhibition to the combination of the activated species is involved. The same effect could be responsible for the exclusive formation of 5,5 -disubstituted 2,2 -dipyridines from 3-substi-tuted pyridines, as well as for the low yields of 3,3, 5,5 -tetramethyl-2,2 -bipyridines obtained from 3,5-lutidine and of 3,3 -dimethyl-2,2 -... 

In cases in which the ionic liquid is not directly involved in creating the active catalytic species, a co-catalytic interaction between the ionic liquid solvent and the dissolved transition metal complex still often takes place and can result in significant catalyst activation. When a catalyst complex is, for example, dissolved in a slightly acidic ionic liquid, some electron-rich parts of the complex (e.g., lone pairs of electrons in the ligand) will interact with the solvent in a way that will usually result in a lower electron density at the catalytic center (for more details see Section 5.2.3). 

In general, most of the methods used to analyze the chemical nature of the ionic liquid itself, as described in Chapter 4, should also be applicable, in some more sophisticated form, to study the nature of a catalyst dissolved in the ionic liquid. For attempts to apply spectroscopic methods to the analysis of active catalysts in ionic liquids, however, it is important to consider three aspects a) as with catalysis in conventional media, the lifetime of the catalytically active species will be very short, making it difficult to observe, b) in a realistic catalytic scenario the concentration of the catalyst in the ionic liquid will be very low, and c) the presence and concentration of the substrate will influence the catalyst/ionic liquid interaction. These three concerns alone clearly show that an ionic liquid/substrate/catalyst system is quite complex and may be not easy to study by spectroscopic methods. 

However, attempts to reuse the ionic catalyst solution in consecutive batches failed. While the products could readily be isolated after the reaction by extraction with SCCO2, the active nickel species deactivated rapidly within three to four batch-wise cycles. The fact that no such deactivation was observed in later experiments with the continuous flow apparatus described below (see Figure 5.4-2) clearly indicate the deactivation of the chiral Ni-catalyst being mainly related to the instability of the active species in the absence of substrate. 

In the direct coupling reaction (Scheme 30), it is presumed that a coordinatively unsaturated 14-electron palladium(o) complex such as bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(o) serves as the catalytically active species. An oxidative addition of the organic electrophile, RX, to the palladium catalyst generates a 16-electron palladium(n) complex A, which then participates in a transmetalation with the organotin reagent (see A—>B). After facile trans- cis isomerization (see B— C), a reductive elimination releases the primary organic product D and regenerates the catalytically active palladium ) complex. 

Such a complex, cw-Rh(CO)2I2, is the active species in the Monsanto process for low-pressure carbonylation of methanol to ethanoic acid. The reaction is first order in iodomethane and in the rhodium catalyst the rate-determining step is oxidative addition between these followed by... 

So far the problem of active center formation in chromium oxide catalysts amounted mainly to a discussion of the oxidation number of chromium that is necessary for catalytic activity. As an active species chromium ions having practically every possible oxidation number—... 

Promotion, electrochemical promotion and metal-support interactions are three, at a first glance, independent phenomena which can affect catalyst activity and selectivity in a dramatic manner. In Chapter 5 we established the (functional) similarities and (operational) differences of promotion and electrochemical promotion. In this chapter we established again the functional similarities and only operational differences of electrochemical promotion and metal-support interactions on ionic and mixed conducting supports. It is therefore clear that promotion, electrochemical promotion and metal-support interactions on ion-conducting and mixed-conducting supports are three different facets of the same phenomenon. They are all three linked via the phenomenon of spillover-backspillover. And they are all three due to the same underlying cause The interaction of adsorbed reactants and intermediates with an effective double layer formed by promoting species at the metal/gas interface (Fig. 11.2). 

---