Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Analysis substrate

Fe content analyses were performed using a colorimetric technique as described in Karamanev et al. (2002). [Pg.80]

The analyses of aromatic components were performed on a 1525 Binary Waters HPLC with a dual absorbance detector using a Symmetry Cl 8 column and a mobile phase of methanol and water. Carboxylic acids analyses were performed using the same HPLC system with an Atlantis dC18 column and mobile phase. pH was monitored with a Coming 430 pH meter. For most experiments, the total organic carbon was also analyzed using a Shimadzu 5050 TOC analyzer equipped with a NDIR detector coupled with an autosampler ASI 5000. [Pg.80]

The identification of both aromatic and carboxylic intermediates was performed comparing the retention times of model reactants with those of the reaction intermediates detected in the samples. Additionally, comparisons with spectra provided in catalogs from column manufacturers were made to corroborate the identification of reaction intermediates. [Pg.80]


For MK2, one may use a peptide substrate (see, e.g., Manke et al, 2005) or recombinant heat shock protein (hsp) 25 (Stokoe et al, 1992). For the peptide substrate, analysis is as described for the p90RSK assay. If using hsp27 as substrate, samples of the reaction products are analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography or quantitation performed by phosphorimager. [Pg.167]

FIGURE 6.53 Multiplexing P450 substrate analysis. Four substrates for each CYP450 were incubated in the absence (A) or presence (B) of human liver microsomes at room temperature for 20 min. The reactions were then quenched and samples were analyzed using /rPLC. The principle of this experiment is shown in the top panel. [Pg.197]

Fig. 7.6 Dependence of factors A2 and B2, Equation 7.25, on the progress of reaction forkL/kn = 1.1. Top = substrate analysis. Bottom = product analysis... Fig. 7.6 Dependence of factors A2 and B2, Equation 7.25, on the progress of reaction forkL/kn = 1.1. Top = substrate analysis. Bottom = product analysis...
Semiconductors Process gases, plasma gases, substrate analysis for contaminants Gas composition analysis Raw materials screening Trace analysis Quality control... [Pg.190]

Reaction (19) causes larger isotope effect determined for product than effect for substrate due to additional fractionation of analysed carbon atom in the side reaction. For mechanistic analysis 13C KIE based on the substrate analysis was used. DFT calculations of isotope effects for each step of the reaction led to conclusion that the rate-determining step involves breaking of the P-C bond in the tetragonal pyramidal intermediate. [Pg.156]

Depending on the target analyte and the application one or the other limiting case is desired. Multiple substrate analysis over a long time period, i.e., high longterm stability, requires diffusional limitation. A typical example is a glucose sensor for an autoanalyzer in a clinical laboratory. [Pg.256]

The Caradonna group studied the ability of 19 and 20 to catalyze the decomposition of peracids in MeOH by using TBPH as trapping reagent (44). Both raefa-chloroperbenzoic acid (raCPBA) and phenyl-peracetic acid (PPAA) were catalytically decomposed to yield 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenoxy radical, TBP, and HCHO no active oxygen was found at the end of the reaction. The mechanism of catalytic peracid decomposition (homolytic vs. heterolytic) was examined by using PPAA as substrate. Analysis of the PPAA decomposition products showed that 19 induced a heterolytic pathway no products derived from the benzyl radical were detected. Under similar conditions, the decomposition of PPAA by 22 was shown to follow a homolytic mechanism. [Pg.111]

Hansen, J., Billich, S., Schulze, T., Sukrow, S., and Moelling, K.(1988). Partial purification and substrate analysis of bacterially expressed HIV protease by means of monoclonal antibody. 3/50 y. 7, 1785-1791. [Pg.653]

We can define an apparent yield of product from substrate (Fps) as a measure of the efficiency of product formation that can be used to compare cells grown in different culture systems or in different media. Product P is a cellular product such as monoclonal antibody, while substrate S may be serum, glucose, glutamine, oxygen or any other important substrate. Analysis of the overall yield (from endpoint calculations) may allow for comparison of production efficiency between different reactors and culture conditions. Analysis of the yield at various time points allows for detection of changes in the mechanisms of product formation. Product yields are useful in identifying product degradation in culture (as evidenced by a decrease in Ypg for aU substrates). [Pg.157]

Updike, S.J. and Hicks, G.P. (1957) Reagentless substrate analysis with immobilized enzymes. Science, 158, 270-272. [Pg.65]

The detailed treatment of pH effects is complicated, since various possibilities have to be taken into account. A very simple situation occurs when the reaction follows the original Michaelis-Menten mechanism, in which the enzyme and substrate form an addition complex which breaks down in a single stage. The enzyme-substrate complex may also exist in three states of ionization, and perhaps only the interrnediate form is capable of giving rise to products. This simple case is represented in Figure 10.8. Intuitively we can see that at low substrate concentrations, when the enzyme exists mainly in the free form, the pH behavior will be controlled by the ionization of the free enzyme. Analysis of the experimental pH dependence at low substrate concentrations therefore will allow us to determine the acid dissociation constants and for the free enzyme. On the other hand, if we saturate the enzyme with substrate, analysis of the pH behavior will now give the values of K and K, which relate to the ionization of the enzyme-substrate complex. [Pg.442]

Updike, S. J., Hicks, G. P., Reagentless Substrate Analysis with Immobilized Enzymes , Science 158 (1967) 270-272. [Pg.107]

Puls J (1993) Substrate analysis of forest and agricultural wastes. In Saddler JN (ed) Bioconversion of forest and agricultural plant residues. CAB International, Wallingford, p 13... [Pg.80]

Substrate analysis and molecular cloning of the extracellular alkaline phosphatase of Streptomyces griseus. Microbiology 147, 1 525-1533. [Pg.161]

Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER 3rd, Hurov KE, Luo J, Bakalarski CE, Zhao Z, Solimini N, Lerenthal Y, Shiloh Y, Gygi SP, Elledge SJ. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007 316 1160-1166. [Pg.188]

Definitive metabolizing enzyme reaction phenotyping Transporter inhibition substrate analysis... [Pg.485]

In studying the metabolic activity of a tissue before and after the administration of a drug, it is necessary to perform two types of analysis, i.e. substrate analysis and enzyme analysis. Metabolic competence can only be evaluated from a study of both. The chemical techniques used for substrate analysis are outside the scope of the present text, but those needed for the detection of most enzyme substrates can be found in the literature. [Pg.50]

These different methods were evaluated and compared (Nederlof, Van Riemsdijk, and Koopal 1992,1994) it is found that LSA gives the better approximation, whereas the DEE function is perfect only for homogeneous substrates. Analysis with cases with known affinity spectra show that LSA returns good approximations but flattened, whereas the DEE method gives distorted spectra but well detects smaU, thin peaks. [Pg.399]

C. Coiffier, Top-down approach for synthesis of new biologically active substrates analysis of preferred conformations of C-furanosides by means of theoretical chemistry , PhD Thesis, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, 2009, 297 pages. [Pg.423]

In summary, a high shear rate is able to confine and orient the chains of the PDMS surface. The cohesion, or shear resistance, of this layer will be lower (i.e less dissipative) than hydrophilic-wafer/PDMS interactions, explaining the decrease of the friction with speed for the hydrophilic substrate, but greater (more dissipative) than hydrophobic-wafer/PDMS interactions, explaining the increase of the friction with speed for the hydrophilic substrate. Finally, at high speed, shear should occur preferentially within this confined layer (and consequently not exactly at the polymer-substrate interface), leading to similar friction for both substrates. Analysis of the transfer layer (observed by atomic force microscopy) allows a better understanding of the involved mechanisms [25-27],... [Pg.255]

The measure of the catalytic activity of an enzyme is the rate of the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme. The conditions of an enzyme activity assay are optimized with relation to type and ionic strength of the buffer, pH, and concentrations of substrate, cosubstrate and activators used. The closely controlled assay conditions, including the temperature, are critical because, in contrast to substrate analysis, the reliability of the results in this case often can not be verified by using a weighed standard sample. [Pg.141]


See other pages where Analysis substrate is mentioned: [Pg.302]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.4171]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.2908]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.751]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.217]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.80 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



Global analysis and modification of substrates

Kinetic analysis substrate

Substrate determination, enzymatic analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info