Subject matter analysis

C. Lipson and N. J. Sheth, Statistica/Design andAna/ysis of Engineering Experiments, McGraw-HiU, New York, 1972. "This book is written in a relatively simple style so that a reader with a moderate knowledge of mathematics may foUow the subject matter. No prior knowledge of statistics is necessary." Appreciably more discussion is devoted to statistical analysis than to the planning of experiments. Some relatively nonstandard subjects (for an introductory text), such as accelerated experiments, fatigue experiments, and renewal analysis are also included. 

This brief introduction section is followed by a host of topics related to health risk analysis and characteriziition. The subject matter includes ... 

In this, the last chapter, we shall describe briefly several important topics that are closely related to the principal subject matter of this book, and yet somewhat removed from the high road of chemical analysis. 

Quantitative analysis of multicomponent additive packages in polymers is difficult subject matter, as evidenced by results of round-robins [110,118,119]. Sample inhomogeneity is often greater than the error in analysis. In procedures entailing extraction/chromatography, the main uncertainty lies in the extraction stage. Chromatographic methods have become a ubiquitous part of quantitative chemical analysis. Dissolution procedures (without precipitation) lead to the most reliable quantitative results, provided that total dissolution can be achieved follow-up SEC-GC is molecular mass-limited by the requirements of GC. Of the various solid-state procedures (Table 10.27), only TG, SHS, and eventually Py, lead to easily obtainable accurate quantitation. 

Analysis This case presents an example where superior and unexpected results associated with a molecule (one enantiomer) conveyed patentability to the enantiomer over its previously disclosed (prior art) racemate. The case also introduces another mechanism through which patents can be defeated by demonstrating that the claimed subject matter is obvious. 

The use of checklists as a primary root cause analysis tool is virtually identical to the use of predefined trees. This is hardly surprising as most predefined trees are really a succession of checklists organized by subject matter (category) into an arrangement of branches within the tree. 

The use of checklists to supplement another root cause analysis method can be a very powerful technique, for example, human factors checklist(s) may be used in conjunction with logic trees. The checklist may be used as a guide during development of a logic tree, or as a check after the tree has been developed. The checklist essentially acts as a memory jogger to direct the investigation team. This is especially helpful if the team lacks previous experience in the subject matter. 

Most research papers that describe and conduct specific experiments, interpret experimental data, and evaluate the objective results of others, are often scientific in the nature and the tone of their writing style. In other words, these papers focus more on the accumulation of objective evidence, the various means by which data was tested and interpreted, and finally, the analysis of these results. Usually, these papers, by the specific nature of their subject matter and disciplines, are more focused in their scope. They are also more likely to be dictated in topic matter by a particular professor, professional discipline, or company. Some very broad ideas for possible topics in this area might include ... 

Randomness, independence and trend (upward, or downward) are fundamental concepts in a statistical analysis of observations. Distribution-free observations, or observations with unknown probability distributions, require specific nonparametric techniques, such as tests based on Spearman s D - type statistics (i.e. D, D, D, Z)k) whose application to various electrochemical data sets is herein described. The numerical illustrations include surface phenomena, technology, production time-horizons, corrosion inhibition and standard cell characteristics. The subject matter also demonstrates cross fertilization of two major disciplines. 

A more specific irritant has been the absence of a chronological analysis of when and how Marcel Duchamp might have wandered into this tricky subject matter. As shown here through extensive exposition, when (as a tentative premiere essai) was in April 1910, but an explanation of how becomes more complicated, for the development of Duchamp s esoteric... 

The chemistry of the elements in aqueous solution is a very important aspect of the chemistry discipline because of its numerous applications in many sciences, applied sciences, engineering fields, and technologies. Years ago, much of the subject matter was taught in courses under the title of qualitative analysis. But those courses disappeared and in many universities, nothing replaced the loss of subject matter. Courses in descriptive inorganic chemistry came to be offered in many schools, but only a portion of the subject matter actually dealt with the detailed chemical behavior of the elements in aqueous solution. 

During the last 5 to 10 years there was a growing tendency to include subject matters of societal relevance into a broad view of Environmental Chemistry. Topics include LCA (Life Cycle Analysis), Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and others. Whilst these topics are of great importance for the development and acceptance of Environmental Chemistry Publishers and Editors have decided to keep the Handbook essentially a source of information on hard sciences . 

For the Argument task, you will not be required to know any technical analytical terms or systems of analysis. You may have learned some terminology for fallacies or analysis in your undergraduate classes, but you are not required to have any specific kind of knowledge of any particular subject matter. Instead, you will be assessed on how well you understand, analyze, and evaluate an argument, as well as on how well you convey your analysis in writing. 

The only other 102 section that might apply to the prior inventive acts of the German chemist is 102(g), but it will not. Unlike in part (4), we do not have an interference situation. In the previous hypothetical, the German inventor was pursuing a patent in the United States and found himself in a contest to prove who invented the subject matter first. We learned that the German inventor abandoned his patent application in the United States and thus could not be involved in an interference. As a result of this analysis, the date of the act of the invention itself will not be relevant because none of the 102 sections apply to our fact scenario. 

As our precedent makes clear, however, the analysis need not seek out precise teachings directed to the specific subject matter of the challenged claim, for a court can take account of the inferences... 

The claimed compound is a natural constituent of strawberries. The analysis of natural constituents of foods is now conventional as it was at the time of the filing of this application. To analyze strawberries, identify the claimed constituent and use it in its obvious environment, e.g. food or flavoring, would be obvious to the ordinary worker in the art. Attention is drawn to the Kratz paper, cited above, which sets forth that inventor Kratz did not do anything more than analyze strawberries so that information derived from the analysis could be used to improve the imitation strawberry flavor. There is nothing in the record to indicate unobvious subject matter. On the contrary, the record establishes that applicants have done no more than do the expected analysis for the... 

---