Steady-State Random mechanism

Fromm and Rudolph have discussed the practical limitations on interpreting product inhibition experiments. The table below illustrates the distinctive kinetic patterns observed with bisubstrate enzymes in the absence or presence of abortive complex formation. It should also be noted that the random mechanisms in this table (and in similar tables in other texts) are usually for rapid equilibrium random mechanism schemes. Steady-state random mechanisms will contain squared terms in the product concentrations in the overall rate expression. The presence of these terms would predict nonhnearity in product inhibition studies. This nonlin-earity might not be obvious under standard initial rate protocols, but products that would be competitive in rapid equilibrium systems might appear to be noncompetitive in steady-state random schemes , depending on the relative magnitude of those squared terms. See Abortive Complex... 

Equal isotope effect on the two V/K values suggests one of several possibilities, including an Equilibrium Ordered mechanism with or without a dead-end EB complex, a Rapid Equilibrium Random mechanism, or a Steady-State Random mechanism in which the rates of release of A and B from the central complex are equal. 

Based on isotope effects only, it is not possible to distinguish the Rapid Equilibrium Ordered from the Rapid Equilibrium Random mechanism. However, the first mechanism gives a distinctive initial velocity pattern that intersects on the ordinate with B as the varied substrate. To teU the difference between the Rapid Equilibrium Random and the Steady-State Random mechanism will require other methods, such as the isotope trapping method (Rose et al, 1974), or isotopic exchange. 

Occasionally rate expressions are described as 1/1, 2/1, etc., functions, referring to the maximum power of the substrate concentration in the numerator (N) and denominator (D). For example, consider the case of the steady-state random Bi Uni mechanism. The reciprocal form of the rate expression (at constant [B]) has the general form of 1/v = ( o + a[A] -t da2[A] )/ (na[A] + na2[A] ) where the Rvalues are collections of rate constants. If both the numerator and denominator of this reciprocal form of the rate expression are divided by the substrate concentration raised to the highest power in which it appears (in this case, [A] ), then the numerator has a term in 1/[A] (as well as 1/[A] and 1/[A]°) whereas the denominator has terms in 1/[A] and 1/[A]°. Thus, this rate expression is a 2/1 function. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

EB][A]/[EAB], and = [EA][B]/[EAB]. The steady-state random Bi Bi rate expression is a more complex equation containing additional terms of [A] [B] and [A][B] in the numerator and [A], [B], [A] [B], and [A][B] in the denominator. Rudolph and Fromm" have looked at the effect of the magnitude of these other terms on initial rate and product inhibition studies. See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

Hexokinase does not yield parallel reciprocal plots, so the Ping Pong mechanism can be discarded. However, initial velocity studies alone will noi discriminate between the rapid equilibrium random and steady-state ordered mechanisms. Both yield ihe same velocity equation and families of intersecting reciprocal plots. Other diagnostic procedures must be used (e.g., product inhibition, dead-end inhibition, equilibrium substrate binding, and isotope exchange studies). These procedures are described in detail in the author s Enzyme Kinetics behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-State Enzyme Systems, Wiley-Interscience (1975),... 

This brings us to the final mechanism we need to consider for a 2-substrate reaction, namely a random-order mechanism. We have assumed that we would be alerted to the possibility of a steady-state random-order mechanism by non-linear primary or secondary plots, but it is possible to get linear kinetics with a random-order mechanism. If we make the assumption that the further reaction of the ternary complex EAB is much slower than the network of reactions connecting E to EAB via EA and EB, then there are only 4 kinetically significant complexes and their concentrations are related to one another by substrate concentrations and dissociation constants. This is the rapid-equilibrium random-order mechanism, and the assumption made is analogous to the Michaelis-Menten equilibrium assumption for a 1-substrate mechanism. 

Let us take the last example in Table 1, the Steady-State Random Bi Uni mechanism. The number of enzyme species or comers in the basic figure is four and the number of lines is five. Thus,... 

The upper-part of Table 3 shows the rapid equilibrium mechanisms and the lower-part the steady-state mechanisms. At the end of the table is the Steady-State Random Bi Bi mechanism that is included for comparison. The steady-state random case in practice gives the same patterns as rapid equilibrium ones one can usually teU the difference only by differential rates of isotopic exchange or the measurement of stickiness. 

Finite but unequal isotope effects on the two substrate V/K values suggests a Steady-State Random kinetic mechanism. The smaller of the V/K isotope effects reflects the stickier substrate. In reaction (17.61), it means that the rate constant fcg is substantial, and that the central complex is able to dissociate back to EA as well as to EB. 

A critical feature of the random ternary complex mechanism is that for either substrate the dissociation constant from the binary enzyme complex may be different from that of the ternary enzyme complex. For example, the Ks value for AX dissociation from the E AX complex will have a value of K v<. The affinity of AX for the enzyme may, however, be modulated by the presence of the other substrate B, so that the dissociation constant for AX from the ternary E.AX.B complex may now be c/Xax, where a is a constant that defines the degree of positive or negative regulation of the affinity of AX for the enzyme by the other substrate. The overall steady state velocity equation for this type of mechanism is given by Equation (2.15) ... 

Restricting ourselves to the rapid equilibrium approximation (as opposed to the steady-state approximation) and adopting the notation of Cleland [158 160], the most common enzyme-kinetic mechanisms are shown in Fig. 8. In multisubstrate reactions, the number of participating reactants in either direction is designated by the prefixes Uni, Bi, or Ter. As an example, consider the Random Bi Bi Mechanism, depicted in Fig. 8a. Following the derivation in Ref. [161], we assume that the overall reaction is described by vrbb = k+ [EAB — k EPQ. Using the conservation of total enzyme... 

It is most remarkable that the entropy production in a nonequilibrium steady state is directly related to the time asymmetry in the dynamical randomness of nonequilibrium fluctuations. The entropy production turns out to be the difference in the amounts of temporal disorder between the backward and forward paths or histories. In nonequilibrium steady states, the temporal disorder of the time reversals is larger than the temporal disorder h of the paths themselves. This is expressed by the principle of temporal ordering, according to which the typical paths are more ordered than their corresponding time reversals in nonequilibrium steady states. This principle is proved with nonequilibrium statistical mechanics and is a corollary of the second law of thermodynamics. Temporal ordering is possible out of equilibrium because of the increase of spatial disorder. There is thus no contradiction with Boltzmann s interpretation of the second law. Contrary to Boltzmann s interpretation, which deals with disorder in space at a fixed time, the principle of temporal ordering is concerned by order or disorder along the time axis, in the sequence of pictures of the nonequilibrium process filmed as a movie. The emphasis of the dynamical aspects is a recent trend that finds its roots in Shannon s information theory and modem dynamical systems theory. This can explain why we had to wait the last decade before these dynamical aspects of the second law were discovered. 

An enzyme-catalyzed reaction involving two substrates and one product. There are two basic Bi Uni mechanisms (not considering reactions containing abortive complexes or those catagorized as Iso mechanisms). These mechanisms are the ordered Bi Uni scheme, in which the two substrates bind in a specific order, and the random Bi Uni mechanism, in which either substrate can bind first. Each of these mechanisms can be either rapid equilibrium or steady-state systems. 

THE COMBINED EQUILIBRIUM AND STEADY-STATE TREATMENT. There are a number of reasons why a rate equation should be derived by the combined equilibrium and steady-state approach. First, the experimentally observed kinetic patterns necessitate such a treatment. For example, several enzymic reactions have been proposed to proceed by the rapid-equilibrium random mechanism in one direction, but by the ordered pathway in the other. Second, steady-state treatment of complex mechanisms often results in equations that contain many higher-order terms. It is at times necessary to simplify the equation to bring it down to a manageable size and to reveal the basic kinetic properties of the mechanism. 

An enzyme reaction mechanism involving A binding before B and followed with the random release of products. In the absence of products and abortive complexes, the steady-state rate expression is identical to the rate expression for the ordered Bi Bi mechanism . A random on-ordered off Bi Bi mechanism has been proposed for a mutant form of alcohol dehydrogenase. ... 

A procedure that assists in the characterization of binding mechanisms for sequential (/.e., non-ping pong) reactions . The same general initial rate expression applies to the steady-state ordered Bi Bi reaction, the rapid-equilibrium random Bi Bi reaction, and the Theorell-... 

An enzyme-catalyzed reaction scheme in which the two substrates (A and B) can bind in any order, resulting in the formation of a single product of the enzyme-catalyzed reaction (hence, this reaction is the reverse of the random Uni Bi mechanism). Usually the mechanism is distinguished as to being rapid equilibrium (/.c., the ratedetermining step is the central complex interconversion, EAB EP) or steady-state (in which the substrate addition and/or product release steps are rate-contributing). See Multisubstrate Mechanisms... 

Steady-State Expression. In the absence of significant amounts of product, P (thus, initial rate conditions in which [P] 0), the steady-state expression for the random Bi Uni mechanism having two central complexes... 

Many amorphous homopolymers and random copolymers show thermorheologically simple behavior within the usual experimental accuracy. Plazek (23,24), however, found that the steady-state viscosity and steady-state compliance of polystyrene cannot be described by the same WLF equation. The effect of temperature on entanglement couplings can also result in thermorheologically complex behavior. This has been shown on certain polymethacrylate polymers and their solutions (22, 23, 26, 31). The time-temperature superposition of thermorheologically simple materials is clearly not applicable to polymers with multiple transitions. The classical study in this area is that by Ferry and co-workers (5, 8) on polymethacrylates with relatively long side chains. In these the complex compliance is the sum of two contributions with different sets of relaxation mechanisms the compliance of the chain backbone and that of the side chains, respectively. 

Measurement of adsorption/desorption, percolation, mechanical stability and adhesion characteristics of active carbons prepared in ordinary laboratory conditions and then the application of models of steady-state systems with random fluxes to the complexes of measured parameters. 

Cleland (160), steady-state kinetics of a Theorell-Chance mechanism can generally apply also to a rapid-equilibrium random mechanism with two dead-end complexes. However, in view of the data obtained with site-specific inhibitors this latter mechanism is unlikely in the case of the transhydrogenase (70, 71). The proposed mechanism is also consistent with the observation of Fisher and Kaplan (118) that the breakage of the C-H bonds of the reduced nicotinamide nucleotides is not a rate-limiting step in the mitochondrial transhydrogenase reaction. 

As pointed out previously in this review the steady-state kinetics of mitochondrial transhydrogenase, earlier interpreted to indicate a ternary Theorell-Chance mechanism on the basis of competitive relationships between NAD and NADH and between NADP and NADPH, and noncompetitive relationships between NAD" and NADP" and between NADH and NADPH, has been reinterpreted in the light of more recent developments in the interpretation of steady-state kinetic data. Thus, although the product inhibition patterns obtained in the earlier reports [75-77] using submitochondrial particles were close to identical to those obtained in a more recent report [90] using purified and reconstituted transhydrogenase, the reinterpretation favors a random mechanism with the two dead-end complexes NAD E NADP and NADH E NADPH. A random mechanism is also supported by the observation that the transhydrogenase binds to immobilized NAD as well as NADP [105] in the absence of the second substrate. 

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, donble-blind stndy volnnteers with steady-state digoxin concentrations took either placebo, a standardized extract of St. John s wort, encapsnlated St. John s wort powder, St. John s wort tea, or an encapsnlated fatty oil formnlation of St. John s wort (31). The extract and the powder cansed marked rednc-tions in digoxin concentrations bnt the tea and the fatty oil formulation did not. The mechanism was not discussed, and it is not clear why the different formulations had different effects. 

---