Enzyme ternary complex

In order to show that the origin of this difference is not a function of the particular substrate analogue used, similar NMR relaxation studies have been performed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)1401 since the crystal structure of the enzyme-NADH-DMSO ternary complex is well resolved.1366 From the relaxation data, the distance between the methyl protons of DMSO and Co11 was calculated to be 8.9 0.9 A, again too great for direct coordination of the sulfoxide group to the metal ion. Since the cobalt enzyme appears to be functionally similar to the native enzyme, the difference is unlikely to be a direct result of substitution. One possibility is that there may actually be a difference between the solution and crystalline structure of the enzyme ternary complex, particularly since it is well established that the crystalline enzyme is 1000 times less active than in solution.1402... 

In the case of the isobutyraraide-NADH-enzyme ternary complex, the affinity of the enzyme-NADH binary complex for isobutyramide is increased by a factor of relative to that of the native enzyme in the absence of NADH... 

In the reduction of pyruvate to lactate, isoenzymes of lactate dehydrogenase from pig heart and pig muscle exerted no kinetic deuterium isotope effect (Holbrook and Stinson, 1973). The results reveal that the process involving the movement of the hydrogen nucleus does not constitute the rate-determining step. Here, the isomerization of the substrate-NADH-enzyme ternary complex to an "active complex" is suggested to be the rate-determining step. The question of whether the "active complex" corresponds to a "charge transfer complex" or to a "conformationally distorted complex" remains unsolved. 

The overall direction of the reaction will be determined by the relative concentrations of ATP, ADP, Cr, and CrP and the equilibrium constant for the reaction. The enzyme can be considered to have two sites for substrate (or product) binding an adenine nucleotide site, where ATP or ADP binds, and a creatine site, where Cr or CrP is bound. In such a mechanism, ATP and ADP compete for binding at their unique site, while Cr and CrP compete at the specific Cr-, CrP-binding site. Note that no modified enzyme form (E ), such as an E-PO4 intermediate, appears here. The reaction is characterized by rapid and reversible binary ES complex formation, followed by addition of the remaining substrate, and the rate-determining reaction taking place within the ternary complex. 

In this case, the leading substrate, A (also called the obligatory or compulsory substrate), must bind first. Then the second substrate, B, binds. Strictly speaking, B cannot bind to free enzyme in the absence of A. Reaction between A and B occurs in the ternary complex, and is usually followed by an ordered release of the products of the reaction, P and Q. In the schemes below, Q is the product of A and is released last. One representation, suggested by W. W. Cleland, follows ... 

Li, Z., and Meighen, E. A. (1994). The turnover of bacterial luciferase is limited by a slow decomposition of the ternary enzyme-product complex of luciferase, FMN, and fatty acid. J. Biol. Chem. 269 6640-6644. 

In such inhibition, the inhibitor and die substrate can simultaneously bind to the enzyme. The nature of the enzyme-inhibitor-substrate binding has resulted in a ternary complex defined as EIS. The Ks and Kt are identical to the corresponding dissociation constants. It is also assumed that the EIS does not react further and is unable to deliver any product P. The rate equation for non-competitive inhibition, unvAX, is influenced ... 

In non-competitive inhibition, the substrate (S) and inhibitor (I) have equal potential to bind to the free enzyme (E). The inhibitor forms a ternary complex with enzyme-substrate (ES) whereas the substrate will form another ternary complex with enzyme-inhibitor (El). Since the non-competitive inhibitor had no effect on the binding of substrate to the enzyme, the Km value remained consistent (or unchanged). There are two different ways for the formation of ESI ternary complex this complex would not form the product and therefore was decreased. Non-competitive inhibitor had no effect on substrate binding or the enzyme-substrate affinity, therefore the apparent rate constant (K ) was unchanged.5 A possible reason for product inhibition was because of the nature of 2-ethoxyethanol,... 

Fibrinolytics. Figure 3 Plasminogen activation (a) Kinetics of plasminogen activation by uPA (urokinase-type) and tPA (tissue-type) plasminogen activators. Effect of fibrin (b) Ternary complex formation between enzyme (tPA), substrate (Pg) and cofactor (F) Abbreviations plasmin (P), fibrin (F), plasminogen (Pg). Plasmin, formed in time, is expressed in arbitrary units. 

In sequential reactions, both substrates must combine with the enzyme to form a ternary complex before catalysis can proceed (Figure 8-11, top). Sequential reactions are sometimes referred to as single displacement... 

The emphasis in kinetic studies of E-IIs has been on the analysis of the rates of phosphorylation of the sugar by the phosphoryl group donor. In the early studies the question was addressed whether phosphorylated E-II would be a catalytic intermediate in the reaction or whether the phosphoryl group would be transferred directly from the donor to the sugar on a ternary complex between the enzyme and its substrates [66,75,95-100]. This matter has been satisfactorily resolved by a number of other techniques in favor of the first option and possible reasons why some systems did not behave according to a ping-pong type of mechanism have been discussed [1]. 

A critical feature of the random ternary complex mechanism is that for either substrate the dissociation constant from the binary enzyme complex may be different from that of the ternary enzyme complex. For example, the Ks value for AX dissociation from the E AX complex will have a value of K v<. The affinity of AX for the enzyme may, however, be modulated by the presence of the other substrate B, so that the dissociation constant for AX from the ternary E.AX.B complex may now be c/Xax, where a is a constant that defines the degree of positive or negative regulation of the affinity of AX for the enzyme by the other substrate. The overall steady state velocity equation for this type of mechanism is given by Equation (2.15) ... 

A second ternary complex reaction mechanism is one in which there is a compulsory order to the substrate binding sequence. Reactions that conform to this mechanism are referred to as bi-bi compulsory ordered ternary complex reactions (Figure 2.13). In this type of mechanism, productive catalysis only occurs when the second substrate binds subsequent to the first substrate. In many cases, the second substrate has very low affinity for the free enzyme, and significantly greater affinity for the binary complex between the enzyme and the first substrate. Thus, for all practical purposes, the second substrate cannot bind to the enzyme unless the first substrate is already bound. In other cases, the second substrate can bind to the free enzyme, but this binding event leads to a nonproductive binary complex that does not participate in catalysis. The formation of such a nonproductive binary complex would deplete the population of free enzyme available to participate in catalysis, and would thus be inhibitory (one example of a phenomenon known as substrate inhibition see Copeland, 2000, for further details). When substrate-inhibition is not significant, the overall steady state velocity equation for a mechanism of this type, in which AX binds prior to B, is given by Equation (2.16) ... 

Figure 2.15 Double recipcrocal plots for a bi-bi enzyme reactions that conform to (A) a ternary complex mechanism and (B) a double-displacement (ping-pong) mechanism.

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the ES complex, or a subsequent species, with little or no affinity for the free enzyme is referred to as uncompetitive. Inhibitors of this modality require the prior formation of the ES complex for binding and inhibition. Hence these inhibitors affect the steps in catalysis subsequent to initial substrate binding that is, they affect the ES —> ES1 step. One might then expect that these inhibitors would exclusively affect the apparent value of Vm and not influence the value of KM. This, however, is incorrect. Recall, as illustrated in Figure 3.1, that the formation of the ESI ternary complex represents a thermodynamic cycle between the ES, El, and ESI states. Hence the augmentation of the affinity of an uncompetitive inhibitor that accompanies ES complex formation must be balanced by an equal augmentation of substrate affinity for the El complex. The result of this is that the apparent values of both Vmax and Ku decrease with increasing concentrations of an uncompetitive inhibitor (Table 3.3). The velocity equation for uncompetitive inhibition is as follows ... 

A much more useful classification of inhibitors can be made on the basis of the mechanisms by which they act. Competitive inhibitors combine, with the enzyme at the same site as the substrate does, thus blocking the first step in the sequence. Noncompetitive inhibitors combine with the enzyme at some other site to give a complex that can still combine with the substrate, but the resultant ternary complex is unreactive. Uncompetitive inhibition results when the inhibitor and substrate combine with enzyme forms as in the following mechanism. 

The fact that N1 is preferentially protonated is in agreement with crystal data obtained for free triazines and enzyme-bound triazines in ternary complex with enzyme and enzyme cofactor (NADPH)45 and also with the difference spectroscopy evidence46 that the N1 of the DHFR-bound MTX is protonated. 

---