Velocity equation

The drag force is exerted in a direction parallel to the fluid velocity. Equation (6-227) defines the drag coefficient. For some sohd bodies, such as aerofoils, a hft force component perpendicular to the liquid velocity is also exerted. For free-falling particles, hft forces are generally not important. However, even spherical particles experience lift forces in shear flows near solid surfaces. 

Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) codes dynamically position the mesh to optimize some feature of the solution. An ALE code has tremendous flexibility. It can treat part of the mesh in a Lagrangian fashion (mesh velocity equation to particle velocity), part of the mesh in an Eulerian fashion (mesh velocity equal to zero), and part in an intermediate fashion (arbitrary mesh velocity). All these techniques can be applied to different parts of the mesh at the same time as shown in Fig. 9.18. In particular, an element can be Lagrangian until the element distortion exceeds some criteria when the nodes are repositioned to minimize the distortion. 

For example, for a line discharging a compressible fluid to atmosphere, the AP is the inlet gauge pressure or the difference between the absolute inlet pressure and atmospheric pressure absolute. When AP/Pi falls outside the limits of the K curves on the charts, sonic velocity occurs at the point of discharge or at some restriction within the pipe, and the limiting value for Y and AP must be determined from the tables on Figure 2-38A, and used in the velocity equation, Vj, above [3]. 

The velocity equation for rapid equilibrium system was easily derived by inversing the numerator and denominator of (5.9.4.10) ... 

The experimental values fit the velocity equation with insignificant deviation in the slope and intersect values at maximum error of 5.94 % (see Table 5.4). The corresponding slope re-plot given by (5.9.5.9) was plotted in Figure 5.23. 

Density of solvent medium. (Used especially in sedi- mentation velocity equation, Chaps. VII and XIV.)... 

The fractional dispersed phase holdup, h, is normally correlated on the basis of a characteristic velocity equation, which is based on the concept of a slip velocity for the drops, VgUp, which then can be related to the free rise velocity of single drops, using some correctional functional dependence on holdup, f(h). 

Under normal circumstances, the use of a characteristic velocity equation of the type shown above can cause difficulties in computation, owing to the existence of an implicit algebraic loop, which must be solved, at every integration step length. In this the appropriate value of L or G satisfying the value of h generated in the differential mass balance equation, must be found as shown in the information flow diagram of Fig. 3.54. 

As explained in Sec. 3.3.1.11, in order to avoid difficulties in the IMPLICIT LOOP solution of the characteristic velocity equation for dispersed phase... 

When the mobile phase is a liquid a variety of equations can be used in addition to the van Deemter equation (1.31) to describe band broadening as a function of the mobile phase velocity, equations (1.36) to (1.39) [49,53,63,85-88]. 

Since the exact profile of the mobile phase flow through a packed bed is unknown, only an approximate description of the ] and broadening process can be attained. For packed column gas chronatography at low mobile phase velocities, equation (1.35) provides a reasonable description of the band broadening process [70,82,83]. 

A critical feature of the random ternary complex mechanism is that for either substrate the dissociation constant from the binary enzyme complex may be different from that of the ternary enzyme complex. For example, the Ks value for AX dissociation from the E AX complex will have a value of K v<. The affinity of AX for the enzyme may, however, be modulated by the presence of the other substrate B, so that the dissociation constant for AX from the ternary E.AX.B complex may now be c/Xax, where a is a constant that defines the degree of positive or negative regulation of the affinity of AX for the enzyme by the other substrate. The overall steady state velocity equation for this type of mechanism is given by Equation (2.15) ... 

A second ternary complex reaction mechanism is one in which there is a compulsory order to the substrate binding sequence. Reactions that conform to this mechanism are referred to as bi-bi compulsory ordered ternary complex reactions (Figure 2.13). In this type of mechanism, productive catalysis only occurs when the second substrate binds subsequent to the first substrate. In many cases, the second substrate has very low affinity for the free enzyme, and significantly greater affinity for the binary complex between the enzyme and the first substrate. Thus, for all practical purposes, the second substrate cannot bind to the enzyme unless the first substrate is already bound. In other cases, the second substrate can bind to the free enzyme, but this binding event leads to a nonproductive binary complex that does not participate in catalysis. The formation of such a nonproductive binary complex would deplete the population of free enzyme available to participate in catalysis, and would thus be inhibitory (one example of a phenomenon known as substrate inhibition see Copeland, 2000, for further details). When substrate-inhibition is not significant, the overall steady state velocity equation for a mechanism of this type, in which AX binds prior to B, is given by Equation (2.16) ... 

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the free enzyme (i.e., for which a = °°) is said to be competitive because the binding of the inhibitor and the substrate to the enzyme are mutually exclusive hence these inhibitors compete with the substrate for the pool of free enzyme molecules. Referring back to the relationships between the steady state kinetic constants and the steps in catalysis (Figure 2.8), one would expect inhibitors that conform to this mechanism to affect the apparent value of KM (which relates to formation of the enzyme-substrate complex) and VmJKM, but not the value of Vmax (which relates to the chemical steps subsequent to ES complex formation). The presence of a competitive inhibitor thus influences the steady state velocity equation as described by Equation (3.1) ... 

Because noncompetitive inhibitors bind to both the free enzyme and the ES complex, or subsequent species in the reaction pathway, we would expect these molecules to exert a kinetic effect on the E + S —> ES" process, thus effecting the apparent values of both VmdX/KM (influenced by both the K and al, terms) and Vmax (influenced by the aK term). This is reflected in the velocity equation for noncompetitive inhibition ... 

An inhibitor that binds exclusively to the ES complex, or a subsequent species, with little or no affinity for the free enzyme is referred to as uncompetitive. Inhibitors of this modality require the prior formation of the ES complex for binding and inhibition. Hence these inhibitors affect the steps in catalysis subsequent to initial substrate binding that is, they affect the ES —> ES1 step. One might then expect that these inhibitors would exclusively affect the apparent value of Vm and not influence the value of KM. This, however, is incorrect. Recall, as illustrated in Figure 3.1, that the formation of the ESI ternary complex represents a thermodynamic cycle between the ES, El, and ESI states. Hence the augmentation of the affinity of an uncompetitive inhibitor that accompanies ES complex formation must be balanced by an equal augmentation of substrate affinity for the El complex. The result of this is that the apparent values of both Vmax and Ku decrease with increasing concentrations of an uncompetitive inhibitor (Table 3.3). The velocity equation for uncompetitive inhibition is as follows ... 

Fluid velocity. Equations 15.14, 15.15, 15.21 and 15.22 require knowledge of the fluid velocity. Liquid velocity on the tube-side is usually of the order of 1 to 3 m s-1. On the shell-side, liquid velocity is usually of the order of 0.5 to... 

Clark, P.E. and Quadir, J.A. "Prop Transport in Hydraulic Fractures A Critical Review of Particle Settling Velocity Equations," SPE/DOE paper 9866, 1981 SPE/DOE Low Permeability Symposium, Denver, May 27-29. 

Figure 9. Model of convective diffusion inside a tube channel (radius R) towards the walls of the tube considered as perfect active surfaces. A Poiseuille profile for the velocity (equation (35)) is also schematically shown with arrows on the right-hand side. The maximum velocity v is reached at the centre of the tube (r = 0)...

When data in the presence of an enzyme inhibitor are presented in the form of a Lineweaver-Burk plot, a series of straight lines should be obtained. The slopes of these hnes may or may not change, and the hnes may or may not intersect at a common point. The relationships between slopes, intersection points, and inhibitor mechanisms are outlined later. Further information regarding these mechanisms, including velocity equations describing data obtained in the presence of inhibitors with diverse mechanisms, can be found in (Segel, 1993). 

From Figure 4.54 it can he seen that the family of reciprocal plots obtained at different fixed concentrations of NADP are essentially parallel to one another. This is also indicated in Figure 4.55, where the value of the slopes of the tines seem to be approximately constant. These results imply that the velocity equation for the ping-pong mechanism [146] can be used to describe the rate of the reaction catalyzed by G6PDH. Although initial velocity studies alone cannot define the exact kinetic mechanism [146,147], we are more interested in the appropriate rate equation that describes the reaction progress. 

---