Stability class estimates

In addition to short-term emission estimates, normally for hourly periods, the meteorological data include hourly wind direction, wind speed, and Pasquill stability class. Although of secondary importance, the hourly data also include temperature (only important if buoyant plume rise needs to be calculated from any sources) and mixing height. 

Other estimations of o-y and cr by Briggs for two different situations, urban and rural, for each Pasquill stability class, as a function of distance between source and receptor, are given in Tables 19-6 and 19-7 (12). 

Comparisons (49) of measured concentrations of SFg tracer released from a 36-m stack, and those estimated by the PTMPT model for 133 data pairs over PasquiU stabilities varying from B through F, had a linear correlation coefficient of 0.81. Here 89% of the estimated values were within a factor of 3 of the measured concentrations. The calculations were most sensitive to the selection of stability class. Changing the stability classification by one varies the concentration by a factor of 2 to 4. 

Numerous analyses of data routinely collected in the United States have been performed by the U.S. National Climatic Center, results of these analyses are available at reasonable cost. The joint frequency of Pasquill stability class, wind direction class (primarily to 16 compass points), and wind speed class (in six classes) has been determined for various periods of record for over 200 observation stations in the United States from either hourly or 3-hourly data. A computer program called STAR (STability ARray) estimates the Pasquill class from the elevation of the sun (approximated from the hour and time of year), wind speed, cloud cover, and ceiling height. STAR output for seasons and the entire period of record can be obtained from the Center. Table 21-2 is similar in format to the standard output. This table gives the frequencies for D stability, based on a total of 100 for all stabilities. 

Thus, the user can input the minimum site boundary distance as the minimum distance for calculation and obtain a concentration estimate at the site boundary and beyond, while ignoring distances less than the site boundary. If the automated distance array is used, then the SCREEN model will use an iteration routine to determine the maximum value and associated distance to the nearest meter. If the minimum and maximum distances entered do not encompass the true maximum concentration, then the maximum value calculated by SCREEN may not be the true maximum. Therefore, it is recommended that the maximum distance be set sufficiently large initially to ensure that the maximum concentration is found. This distance will depend on the source, and some trial and error may be necessary however, the user can input a distance of 50,000 m to examine the entire array. The iteration routine stops after 50 iterations and prints out a message if the maximum is not found. Also, since there may be several local maxima in the concentration distribution associated with different wind speeds, it is possible that SCREEN will not identify the overall maximum in its iteration. This is not likely to be a frequent occurrence, but will be more likely for stability classes C and D due to the larger number of wind speeds examined. 

The area source is assumed to be a rectangular shape, and the model can be used to estimate concentrations within the area. SCREEN examines a range of stability classes and wind speeds to identify the "worst case ... 

Shoreline Fumigation - For rural sources within 3000 m of a large body of water, maximum shoreline fumigation concentrations can be estimated by SCREEN. A stable onshore flow is assumed with stability class F (A0/AZ = 0.035 K/m) and stack height wind speed of 2.5 m/s. Similar to the inversion break-up fumigation case, the maximum ground-level shoreline fumigation concentration is assumed to occur where the top of the stable... 

For each stability class a value for the standard deviations was determined as a function of downwind distance These standard deviations may be used to estimate the concentration of pollutant at any point in the pltune. 

Critical GLC s can usually be calculated based on a unstable atmosphere, thus enabling the designer to determine a worst case scenario. For any given day, typical atmospheric stabihty data can usually be obtained from a local weather bureau, or may be estimated from the so-called Pasquill chart for the appropriate Atmospheric Stability Class (refer to Table 1). 

In the calculations that were made to predict ground level concentrations from a VCM reactor blow off, the Pasquill-Gifford-Holland dispersion model was used as a basis for these estimations. Calculations were made for six different stability classes and ground level concentrations, and at various distances from the point source of emission. 

The parameter classification after Klug is determined by six stability classes (with the German abbreviation AK for Ausbreitungsklasse), reaching from extreme stable (AK I) to extreme labile TAK V). In the Turner stability scheme AK 5 denotes extreme stable, AK 2 extreme labile, see table 2. An estimate of the stability can be made from synoptical observations of solar radiation, cloud cover and wind velocity /14/. With the parameters after Klug equation (3.4) becomes... 

The Monin-Obukhov length L is not a parameter that is routinely measured. Colder (1972), however, established a relation between the stability classes of Pasquill, the roughness height zo (see Section VII,B), and L. The results of his investigation are shown in Fig. 4. Alternatively, the local wind speed and cloud cover measurements are used to estimate the Pasquill stability class (Table IV). In addition, Colder developed a nonogram for relating the gradient Richardson number R-, to the more easily determined bulk Richardson number / (, ... 

The following expressions may be used for the estimation of dispersion coefficients and <7 for stability class D (neutral stability), with x in meters ... 

Use of the equations derived in this section requires estimation of the Monin-Obukhov length L. A number of approaches are available, including the profile and gradient methods using available measurements (Arya 1999). The simplest approach based on the Pasquill stability classes will be discussed in the next section. 

Estimate values of Oy and as a function of downwind distance and stability class for stated averaging time. (A set of measured values must be available. See the next section.)... 

To make an estimate of oy, or the stabiUty class must first be determined. The two typing techniques of Pasquill-Gifford and Turner discussed previously can be used. Then a series of curves or formulas are referenced to find values for Oy and as a function of stability class, downwind distance, and averaging time. For the values of Ty and 7 that follow, averaging time should be considered to be 1 hr. 

From a theoretical perspective, our understanding of the flow field above this aquatic surface tracks that presented above for the atmospheric boundary layer. For the neutral-stability class of turbulent flows the logarithmic velocity profile, the constant flux layer assumption and so on, apply as well. Although Equation 2.21 is valid for use in estimating Cf less measurement on yo, the bottom roughness parameters are available in aquatic environments for producing summary results as shown in Table 2.1. In the absence of these site-specific y values, an alternative approach is used to estimate Cf for hydraulic flows it is presented next. 

Benson17 has tried to collect some thermodynamic data based on a number of empirical rules for this class of radicals. He estimated heats of formation for HS02, MeSO 2) PhSO 2 and HOSO 2 as —42, —55, —37 and — 98kcalmor respectively. He also estimated a stabilization energy for the benzenesulfonyl radical of 14 kcal mol"1, which is very similar to that of the benzyl radical. However, recent kinetic studies18 (vide infra) have shown that arenesulfonyls are not appreciably stabilized relative to alkanesulfonyl radicals, in accord with the ESR studies. 

In this chapter we study the stability with respect to the initial data and the right-hand side of two-layer and three-layer difference schemes that are treated as operator-difference schemes with operators in Hilbert space. Necessary and sufficient stability conditions are discovered and then the corresponding a priori estimates are obtained through such an analysis by means of the energy inequality method. A regularization method for the further development of various difference schemes of a desired quality (in accuracy and economy) in the class of stability schemes is well-established. Numerous concrete schemes for equations of parabolic and hyperbolic types are available as possible applications, bring out the indisputable merit of these methods and unveil their potential. 

---