Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Specificity, animal studies

Phosphorothioates generally protect normal tissues more than tumors. Tumor protection reported in some animal studies can pardy be explained by physiological effects of the particular dmgs, which are specific to rodents (4). WR-2721 does not appear to protect human and most animal tumors, apparentiy because of the low availabiUty of the dmg to tumor cells (4). Many tumors appear to have a reduced capillary density (44), which may mean that these tumors have altered levels of alkaline phosphatase, the enzyme that converts WR-2721 to WR-1065. A reduced abiUty of thiols to protect the hypoxic cells characteristic of many tumors may also contribute to their selectivity for normal tissues. The observation that WR-1065 protects cultured normal human fibroblasts, but not fibrosarcoma tumor cells, suggests that additional factors may contribute to the selectivity of radioprotection by WR-2721 m vivo (18). [Pg.489]

Chapter 3 Health Effects Specific health effects of a given hazardous compound are reported by type of health (death, systemic, immunologic, reproductive), by route of exposure, and by length of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic). In addition, both human and animal studies are reported in this section. [Pg.7]

Immunotoxicity. Only a single case report of skin allergy to methyl parathion has been reported in humans (Lisi et al. 1987). No studies are available in humans exposed to methyl parathion via the inhalation or oral route. Based on limited animal studies, immunotoxicity may be a sensitive end point of methyl parathion-induced toxicity (Shtenberg and Dzhunusova 1968 Street and Sharma 1975). Thus, humans may be at risk for adverse immunological effects following exposure to methyl parathion. The limited information available on the effects of combined exposure to methyl parathion suggest the its toxicity is not route-dependent. Therefore, there is no reason to suspect that the immunotoxic effects observed following oral exposure of animals are route-specific. [Pg.126]

Some animal studies indicate that dietary exposure to methyl parathion causes decreased humoral and cellular responses (Shtenberg and Dzhunusova 1968 Street and Sharma 1975). A more recent, well-designed animal study that included a battery of immuno/lymphoreticular end points showed few effects at the nonneurotoxic doses tested (Crittenden et al. 1998). No adequate studies are available in humans to assess the immunotoxic potential of methyl parathion. Therefore, studies measuring specific immunologic parameters in occupationally exposed populations are needed to provide useful information. Further studies are also needed to investigate the mechanism for methyl parathion-induced immunotoxicity since this information would help to identify special populations at risk for such effects. [Pg.126]

In the case of noncarcinogenic substances, there exists a threshold this is an exposure with a dose below which there would not be adverse effect on the population that is exposed. This is the reference dose (RfD), and it is defined as the daily exposure of a human population without appreciable effects during a lifetime. The RfD value is calculated by dividing the no observed effect level (NOEL) by uncertainty factors. When NOEL is unknown, the lowest observed effect level (LOEL) is used. NOEL and LOEL are usually obtained in animal studies. The main uncertainty factor, usually tenfold, used to calculate the RfD are the following the variations in interspecies (from animal test to human), presence of sensitive individuals (child and old people), extrapolation from subchronic to chronic, and the use of LOEL instead of NOEL. Noncancer risk is assessed through the comparison of the dose exposed calculated in the exposure assessment and the RfD. The quotient between both, called in some studies as hazard quotient, is commonly calculated (Eq. 2). According to this equation, population with quotient >1 will be at risk to develop some specific effect related to the contaminant of concern. [Pg.97]

The importance of adenosine deaminase in the duration and intensity of sleep in humans has been noted recently (Retey et al. 2005). Animal studies suggest that sleep needs are genetically controlled, and this also seems to apply in humans. Probably, a genetic variant of adenosine deaminase, which is associated with the reduced metabolism of adenosine to inosine, specifically enhances deep sleep and slow wave activity during sleep. Thus low activity of the catabolic enzyme for adenosine results in elevated adenosine, and deep sleep. In contrast, insomnia patients could have a distinct polymorphism of more active adenosine deaminase resulting in less adenosine accumulation, insomnia, and a low threshold for anxiety. This could also explain interindividual differences in anxiety symptoms after caffeine intake in healthy volunteers. This could affect the EEG during sleep and wakefulness in a non-state-specific manner. [Pg.446]

Phytochemicals have been the subject of many studies evaluating their effects in relation to common chronic human illnesses such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases. These studies encounter difficulties in using this information to influence the dietary patterns of consumers because in the past they have used models or experiments with animals. However, in the last decade, researchers have moved away from animal studies in favour of human cell models or human intervention studies. Scientists still need to determine the likely incidence of illness from exposure to known amounts of a given natural compound in the diet and specifically in relation to the complex matrices of whole foods. Therefore, it is inevitable that some animal studies have to be continued for toxicological studies. [Pg.314]

Knockout animal studies, in contrast to the above methods, are dependent upon phenotype observation. The approach entails the generation and study of mice in which a specific gene has been deleted. Phenotypic studies can sometimes yield clues as to the function of the gene knocked out. [Pg.61]


See other pages where Specificity, animal studies is mentioned: [Pg.13]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.1038]    [Pg.1227]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.991]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.411]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.123 ]




SEARCH



Specific pathogen-free conditions, animal studies

Study Specifics

Study specifications

© 2024 chempedia.info